The Ministry of Transportation and Communications yesterday unveiled its new proposed rates for the freeway “pay as you go” policy, with long-distance travelers facing higher toll fees than what they pay now.
Minister of Transportation and Communications Yeh Kuang-shih (葉匡時) and National Freeway Bureau Director-General Tseng Dar-jen (曾大仁) presented the new rates during a meeting of the legislature’s Transportation Committee.
However, before Yeh could start briefing the committee, Democratic Progressive Party Legislator Chen Ou-po (陳歐珀), representing Yilan County, occupied the podium and chided the ministry for mentioning nothing in its report about the Chiang Wei-shui Freeway (Freeway No. 5) that runs from Taipei to Yilan, adding that motorists in Yilan would end up paying higher toll fees under the ministry’s proposal.
Photo: Wang Yi-sung, Taipei Times
Dissatisfied with the ministry’s rate plan, he shredded a copy of the report into pieces and threw them at ministry officials.
“You are bullying the people of Yilan. You never came and explained the new rates to people in the county,” Chen said.
The meeting resumed after Chen left the podium after the convener of the meeting, DPP Legislator Lee Kun-tse (李昆澤), promised Chen that he could question the ministry later about the proposed rates.
The bureau had previously offered three rate plans. The first one would not give freeway users any toll-free distance, with each person being charged NT$0.82 per kilometer traveled. The second plan would give drivers 10km of toll-free distance, after which they would have to pay NT$1 per kilometer traveled. The third plan would give drivers 20km of toll-free distance, after which they would be charged NT$1.2 per kilometer if the entire distance traveled is less than 200km. The rate would drop to NT$0.9 per kilometer if the entire distance traveled is 200km or more.
However, the bureau decided to readjust the rates after legislators demanded that travelers on the east-west freeways, including Freeway Nos. 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10 not be asked to pay any toll fee at all.
As such, the three new sets of proposed rates were calculated based on the condition that motorists on the east-west freeways would not be asked to pay toll for two years. Under the first option, motorists will not enjoy any toll-free distance and will be charged NT$0.9 per kilometer. For the second option, motorists will enjoy 15km of toll-free distance and be charged NT$1.2 per kilometer if the total distance is less than 200km. The rate will drop to NT$0.9 per kilometer if the total distance exceeds 200km.
The third option will give motorists a toll-free distance of 20km, with the rate being set at NT$1.3 per kilometer if the distance traveled is less than 200km and NT$1 per kilometer if the distance is 200km and above.
If the third option is chosen, a motorist would have to pay NT$377 for driving from Taipei to Greater Kaohsiung, compared with NT$360 at present.
DPP legislators Kuan Bi-ling (管碧玲) and Tsai Chi-chang (蔡其昌) also questioned the ministry over the use of eTags, which reports said leak users’ information to other businesses.
They said the ministry should not introduce new toll rates until it has come up with measures to regulate how Far Eastern Electronic Toll Collection, the freeway toll-collection service contractor, manages personal information.
KMT Legislator Lin Ming-cheng (林明溱) suggested that the toll-free distance be set at 30km and the toll fee be set below NT$1 per kilometer.
A flustered Lin also slipped up when he said: “The ruling party will suffer a big loss in the next legislative election” if the ministry’s proposed rates are not changed.
The meeting ended without reaching a consensus.
China might accelerate its strategic actions toward Taiwan, the South China Sea and across the first island chain, after the US officially entered a military conflict with Iran, as Beijing would perceive Washington as incapable of fighting a two-front war, a military expert said yesterday. The US’ ongoing conflict with Iran is not merely an act of retaliation or a “delaying tactic,” but a strategic military campaign aimed at dismantling Tehran’s nuclear capabilities and reshaping the regional order in the Middle East, said National Defense University distinguished adjunct lecturer Holmes Liao (廖宏祥), former McDonnell Douglas Aerospace representative in Taiwan. If
TO BE APPEALED: The environment ministry said coal reduction goals had to be reached within two months, which was against the principle of legitimate expectation The Taipei High Administrative Court on Thursday ruled in favor of the Taichung Environmental Protection Bureau in its administrative litigation against the Ministry of Environment for the rescission of a NT$18 million fine (US$609,570) imposed by the bureau on the Taichung Power Plant in 2019 for alleged excess coal power generation. The bureau in November 2019 revised what it said was a “slip of the pen” in the text of the operating permit granted to the plant — which is run by Taiwan Power Co (Taipower) — in October 2017. The permit originally read: “reduce coal use by 40 percent from Jan.
‘SPEY’ REACTION: Beijing said its Eastern Theater Command ‘organized troops to monitor and guard the entire process’ of a Taiwan Strait transit China sent 74 warplanes toward Taiwan between late Thursday and early yesterday, 61 of which crossed the median line in the Taiwan Strait. It was not clear why so many planes were scrambled, said the Ministry of National Defense, which tabulated the flights. The aircraft were sent in two separate tranches, the ministry said. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs on Thursday “confirmed and welcomed” a transit by the British Royal Navy’s HMS Spey, a River-class offshore patrol vessel, through the Taiwan Strait a day earlier. The ship’s transit “once again [reaffirmed the Strait’s] status as international waters,” the foreign ministry said. “Such transits by
Taiwan is doing everything it can to prevent a military conflict with China, including building up asymmetric defense capabilities and fortifying public resilience, Vice President Hsiao Bi-khim (蕭美琴) said in a recent interview. “Everything we are doing is to prevent a conflict from happening, whether it is 2027 or before that or beyond that,” Hsiao told American podcaster Shawn Ryan of the Shawn Ryan Show. She was referring to a timeline cited by several US military and intelligence officials, who said Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had instructed the Chinese People’s Liberation Army to be ready to take military action against Taiwan