Discontent within the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is showing signs of bubbling over as party members call on fellow members to abstain from voting or to nullify their vote when it comes to the election of the next party chairperson.
Sources within the KMT said party members were dissatisfied with Ma’s decision to run for party chairperson due to his poor performance and controversial policies.
However, the source also said that with no strong contender, the only way to make Ma understand how dissatisfied party members are with his performance is to abstain from voting.
With no strong contenders, Ma would win the party election, but members can abstain from voting or nullify their vote, making turnout the lowest since 2001, when direct voting for party members was instituted, the source said.
However, the source added that Ma would feel greater pressure should there be more annulled votes than he received in 2009.
The source added that it would be a symbolic gesture to show party members’ discontent about Ma’s performance.
KMT Central Standing Committee member Lu Hsueh-chang (呂學樟) said the turnout rate would automatically be lower if people were unwilling to vote.
In the current situation of combining party and government policies, the Cabinet needs to have the ability to implement its policies, Lu said.
Another Central Standing Committee member Yao Chiang-lin (姚江臨) said he was also a proponent of combining party and governmental policies, adding that it was natural for the ruling party to take responsibility for governmental blunders.
Commenting on Ma’s bid for a second term as party chairman, Yao said he believed every party member had their own views on the matter, adding that he acknowledged that there were some within the party who were not satisfied with Ma’s performance.
It would be inevitable that some members would not want to vote for Ma, or would give a nullified vote, Yao said.
Another senior Central Standing Committee member said that despite criticism of Ma’s style of leadership and his preferred qualities of personnel, Ma evidently lacked the ability to self-reflect on these issues.
“If we meet a brick wall when we broach these matters in the party, we can only hope that the party will be able to weather the situation,” the member said.
Meanwhile, former KMT honorary chairman Lien Chan (連戰) recently hinted at his possible support for Taichung Mayor Jason Hu (胡志強) to run against Ma in next year’s election for party chairmanship.
The German city of Hamburg on Oct. 14 named a bridge “Kaohsiung-Brucke” after the Taiwanese city of Kaohsiung. The footbridge, formerly known as F566, is to the east of the Speicherstadt, the world’s largest warehouse district, and connects the Dar-es-Salaam-Platz to the Brooktorpromenade near the Port of Hamburg on the Elbe River. Timo Fischer, a Free Democratic Party member of the Hamburg-Mitte District Assembly, in May last year proposed the name change with support from members of the Social Democratic Party and the Christian Democratic Union. Kaohsiung and Hamburg in 1999 inked a sister city agreement, but despite more than a quarter-century of
Taiwanese officials are courting podcasters and influencers aligned with US President Donald Trump as they grow more worried the US leader could undermine Taiwanese interests in talks with China, people familiar with the matter said. Trump has said Taiwan would likely be on the agenda when he is expected to meet Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) next week in a bid to resolve persistent trade tensions. China has asked the White House to officially declare it “opposes” Taiwanese independence, Bloomberg reported last month, a concession that would mark a major diplomatic win for Beijing. President William Lai (賴清德) and his top officials
The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) yesterday expressed “grave concerns” after Singaporean Prime Minister Lawrence Wong (黃循財) reiterated the city-state’s opposition to “Taiwanese independence” during a meeting with Chinese Premier Li Qiang (李強). In Singapore on Saturday, Wong and Li discussed cross-strait developments, the Singaporean Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement. “Prime Minister Wong reiterated that Singapore has a clear and consistent ‘one China’ policy and is opposed to Taiwan independence,” it said. MOFA responded that it is an objective fact and a common understanding shared by many that the Republic of China (ROC) is an independent, sovereign nation, with world-leading
‘ONE CHINA’: A statement that Berlin decides its own China policy did not seem to sit well with Beijing, which offered only one meeting with the German official German Minister for Foreign Affairs Johann Wadephul’s trip to China has been canceled, a spokesperson for his ministry said yesterday, amid rising tensions between the two nations, including over Taiwan. Wadephul had planned to address Chinese curbs on rare earths during his visit, but his comments about Berlin deciding on the “design” of its “one China” policy ahead of the trip appear to have rankled China. Asked about Wadephul’s comments, Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesman Guo Jiakun (郭嘉昆) said the “one China principle” has “no room for any self-definition.” In the interview published on Thursday, Wadephul said he would urge China to
RSS