The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and the Taiwan Solidarity Union (TSU) yesterday blasted the freshly signed cross-strait agreement on investment protection and promotion, saying Taiwan has suffered a humiliating defeat in the negotiations.
Both opposition parties called press conferences yesterday afternoon right after the signing of the cross-strait agreement.
“The agreement was worse than a ‘knockoff agreement’ as it failed to address Taiwanese people’s needs and expectations,” the DPP’s Policy Research Committee Executive Director Joseph Wu (吳釗燮) and China Affairs Department Director Honigmann Hong (洪財隆) told a press conference.
Photo: Liu Hsin-de, Taipei Times
Beijing did not make concessions on most of the major issues, such as arbitration in a third country and the protection of basic human rights, Wu said.
In particular, Wu added, protection of Taiwanese businesspeople’s personal safety was only included as an appendix and its content lacks reciprocity.
Taiwan did not get the international arbitration it wanted in the negotiation, he said, adding the arbitration mechanism was viewed as a “domestic issue” which would make Taiwan a de facto Chinese colony.”
The DPP demanded that the agreement be monitored and amended by the Legislative Yuan, Wu said.
The government should also review all cases of Taiwanese investment victims in China and set a timetable for Beijing to resolve those cases, Wu said.
“Otherwise, this agreement should not be called the investment protection agreement,” he said.
“Taiwan failed to get everything it expected to get, while China got everything it wanted,” Hong summed up the negotiations.
Hong warned that China could use the agreement to demand that Taiwan open up further to Chinese investments.
There are at least four major flaws in the agreement, TSU Chairman Huang Kun-huei (黃昆輝) told a separate press conference yesterday afternoon.
A 24-hour notification clause would not stop China from detaining Taiwanese businesspeople and the inclusion of a national treatment principle and Most Favored Nation treatment would pave the way for a Chinese-investment influx, Huang said.
The agreement would likely decriminalize Chinese actions by turning a large number of cases of illegal seizures of Taiwanese businesspeople’s assets into investment disputes, Huang said.
While the agreement allows person-to-person disputes to be arbitrated in a third country, he added, those disputes could not be arbitrated without mutual consent, making it a “nominal” agreement.
As the 16 agreements signed with China in the past had not been effectively implemented, there would be no reason to believe that the two agreements signed yesterday would be enforced, Huang said.
Meanwhile, the Cross-Strait Agreement Watch Alliance yesterday gave a low grade of 27 points to the signed cross-strait investment protection agreement, saying that it failed to respond to demands from the public.
“The agreement is really disappointing. It made no breakthroughs and is only maintaining the ‘status quo,’” Cross-Strait Agreements Watch convener Lai Chung-chiang (賴中強) said. “It contains no third-party arbitration measures for trade disputes, which exist in most international trade agreements.”
“There’s also no requirement for China to notify businesspeople’s families in Taiwan when Taiwanese nationals are detained in China,” he added.
Lai said the agreement is “surprisingly regrettable.”
A Taiwan Labor Front supervisory board member, Chang Feng-yi (張烽益), panned the agreement for not having any clause protecting workers’ rights.
“In most trade agreements — including the one that Taiwan signed with Japan — there are clauses prohibiting both parties to stimulate investments by lowering labor standards,” Chang said. “It’s regrettable that there’s no such requirement in the cross-strait trade agreement.”
The first global hotel Keys Selection by the Michelin Guide includes four hotels in Taiwan, Michelin announced yesterday. All four received the “Michelin One Key,” indicating guests are to experience a “very special stay” at any of the locations as the establishments are “a true gem with personality. Service always goes the extra mile, and the hotel provides much more than others in its price range.” Of the four hotels, three are located in Taipei and one in Taichung. In Taipei, the One Key accolades were awarded to the Capella Taipei, Kimpton Da An Taipei and Mandarin Oriental Taipei. Capella Taipei was described by
The Taichung District Court yesterday confirmed its final ruling that the marriage between teenage heir Lai (賴) and a man surnamed Hsia (夏) was legally invalid, preventing Hsia from inheriting Lai’s NT$500 million (US$16.37 million) estate. The court confirmed that Hsia chose not to appeal the civil judgement after the court handed down its ruling in June, making the decision final. In the June ruling, the court said that Lai, 18, and Hsia, 26, showed “no mutual admiration before the marriage” and that their interactions were “distant and unfamiliar.” The judge concluded that the couple lacked the “true intention of
EVA Airways today confirmed the death of a flight attendant on Saturday upon their return to Taiwan and said an internal investigation has been launched, as criticism mounted over a social media post accusing the airline of failing to offer sufficient employee protections. According to the post, the flight attendant complained of feeling sick on board a flight, but was unable to take sick leave or access medical care. The crew member allegedly did not receive assistance from the chief purser, who failed to heed their requests for medical attention or call an ambulance once the flight landed, the post said. As sick
INDUSTRY: Beijing’s latest export measures go beyond targeting the US and would likely affect any country that uses Chinese rare earths or related tech, an academic said Taiwanese industries could face significant disruption from China’s newly tightened export controls on rare earth elements, as much of Taiwan’s supply indirectly depends on Chinese materials processed in Japan, a local expert said yesterday. Kristy Hsu (徐遵慈), director of the Taiwan ASEAN Studies Center at the Chung-Hua Institution for Economic Research, said that China’s latest export measures go far beyond targeting the US and would likely affect any country that uses Chinese rare earths or related technologies. With Japan and Southeast Asian countries among those expected to be hit, Taiwan could feel the impact through its reliance on Japanese-made semi-finished products and
RSS