Continuing to sell arms to Taiwan is “a recipe for problems” for Washington, according to Michael Swaine, an Asia specialist at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
In a filmed interview released by Carnegie, Swaine said: “It is unclear to me whether China will continue to accept continued significant US arms sales to Taiwan in response to China’s military buildup without seeking to place greater coercive pressure on the US and possibly Taiwan.”
“This could indeed produce crises between the US and China over time,” he said.
The statement comes as Swaine and others are upsetting some of Taiwan’s supporters in the US with a planned high-profile roundtable discussion titled, “Should the United States Abandon Taiwan?”
Organized by the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) in Washington, the discussion will take place on Oct. 18.
Some of Taiwan’s supporters say no serious consideration is being given to the idea of abandoning Taiwan and that, by providing a platform, the CSIS might be unintentionally promoting it.
“It is not at all a feasible policy option and it is promoted and supported by a very small circle of people, so why discuss it so much?” one academic said. “What are they trying to gain? My cynical side says it’s just another way for these folks to present a provocatively titled panel and get out in front of an audience to promote their latest writings. The beast feeding itself.”
Bonnie Glaser, senior fellow of China Studies at the CSIS, and Nancy Bernkopf Tucker, professor of history at Georgetown University, will make an opening presentation at the roundtable based on their recent article printed by the Washington Quarterly analyzing the question “Should the United States Abandon Taiwan?”
In that article, Glaser and Tucker say that prominent people in the US were insisting in influential publications that it was time for the US to rethink its Taiwan policy and walk away from Taiwan.
However, after examining the “variables,” Glaser and Tucker concluded that the US should neither abandon nor reduce its commitments to Taiwan, but rather it should “strengthen them.”
“Washington has not decided to jettison Taiwan, and it should not. However frightening or seductive China is, appeasing it by sacrificing Taiwan would not be good policy,” they wrote.
Nevertheless, the idea will be discussed at the CSIS roundtable by Charles Glaser, professor of political science at George Washington University and no relation to Bonnie Glaser, and Swaine.
Charles Glaser caused waves earlier this year with an article in Foreign Affairs magazine in which he said the US could avoid conflict with China by backing away from its commitments to Taiwan.
The sensitive nature of the subject was almost immediately made clear when former American Institute in Taiwan chairman Nat Bellocchi attacked Charles Glaser in the Taipei Times, saying “never in my long diplomatic life have I run into a more shortsighted, uninformed and fallacious set of arguments.”
“Foreign Affairs does itself and its readers a disservice by publishing such a flawed article,” Bellocchi added.
Last month, Swaine published an article in The National Interest saying China’s strategic mindset was “quintessentially defensive, largely reactive and focused first and foremost on deterring Taiwan’s independence and defending the Chinese mainland,” not on establishing itself as Asia’s next hegemon.
In his latest statements, Swaine said: “I’m not as certain as many people seem to be that the situation regarding Taiwan will remain as generally benign and stable as it appears to be today.”
He called on the US and China to engage in dialogue to “understand, assess or establish some sort of quid pro quo involving military deployments and arms sales in consultation with the Taiwan government on the US side.”
“But it would also require very different thinking on the part of US officials from what exists today. Because the current US position basically is, ‘It’s not broken, don’t fix it.’ We just keep selling arms to Taiwan if the Chinese keep developing, and to me, that is a recipe for problems,” he added.
June Teufel Dreyer, an expert on Taiwan at the University of Miami, told the Taipei Times: “When articles on this topic appear in Foreign Affairs — written by someone who is not an expert on Taiwan — and the Washington Quarterly, and is given a platform by CSIS, it would appear that the sponsoring groups are trying to promote an agenda to move what could be a minority view into the mainstream.”
“Foreign Affairs, for example, could have run [Charles] Glaser’s article side by side with an article entitled ‘Why the US Must Not Abandon Taiwan.’ But did not. And further, ran another article a year before advocating the Finlandization of Taiwan. This bespeaks an agenda,” she added.
An increase in Taiwanese boats using China-made automatic identification systems (AIS) could confuse coast guards patrolling waters off Taiwan’s southwest coast and become a loophole in the national security system, sources familiar with the matter said yesterday. Taiwan ADIZ, a Facebook page created by enthusiasts who monitor Chinese military activities in airspace and waters off Taiwan’s southwest coast, on Saturday identified what seemed to be a Chinese cargo container ship near Penghu County. The Coast Guard Administration went to the location after receiving the tip and found that it was a Taiwanese yacht, which had a Chinese AIS installed. Similar instances had also
GOOD DIPLOMACY: The KMT has maintained close contact with representative offices in Taiwan and had extended an invitation to Russia as well, the KMT said The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) would “appropriately handle” the fallout from an invitation it had extended to Russia’s representative to Taipei to attend its international banquet last month, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) said yesterday. US and EU representatives in Taiwan boycotted the event, and only later agreed to attend after the KMT rescinded its invitation to the Russian representative. The KMT has maintained long-term close contact with all representative offices and embassies in Taiwan, and had extended the invitation as a practice of good diplomacy, Chu said. “Some EU countries have expressed their opinions of Russia, and the KMT respects that,” he
VIGILANCE: The military is paying close attention to actions that might damage peace and stability in the region, the deputy minister of national defense said The People’s Republic of China (PRC) might consider initiating a hack on Taiwanese networks on May 20, the day of the inauguration ceremony of president-elect William Lai (賴清德), sources familiar with cross-strait issues said. While US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken’s statement of the US expectation “that all sides will conduct themselves with restraint and prudence in the period ahead” would prevent military actions by China, Beijing could still try to sabotage Taiwan’s inauguration ceremony, the source said. China might gain access to the video screens outside of the Presidential Office Building and display embarrassing messages from Beijing, such as congratulating Lai
Four China Coast Guard ships briefly sailed through prohibited waters near Kinmen County, Taipei said, urging Beijing to stop actions that endanger navigation safety. The Chinese ships entered waters south of Kinmen, 5km from the Chinese city of Xiamen, at about 3:30pm on Monday, the Coast Guard Administration said in a statement later the same day. The ships “sailed out of our prohibited and restricted waters” about an hour later, the agency said, urging Beijing to immediately stop “behavior that endangers navigation safety.” Ministry of National Defense spokesman Sun Li-fang (孫立方) yesterday told reporters that Taiwan would boost support to the Coast Guard