Although the Ministry of National Defense and some Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators played down the significance of an incident involving two Chinese fighter aircraft in the Taiwan Strait late last month, analysts say the matter is more than simply routine.
Confirming on Monday media reports that one of two Chinese Sukhoi-27 fighter aircraft shadowing a US U-2 spy plane had crossed the median line in the Taiwan Strait on June 29, ministry officials maintained this was an isolated incident and did not regard it as provocative.
The Chinese aircraft are believed to have been from the 40th Fighter Regiment, 14th Fighter Division at Nanchang-Xiangtang Air Base in Jiangxi Province.
Although the intrusion — reportedly the first since an April 1, 2001, mid-air collision between a US Navy EP-3 aircraft and a Chinese J-8 fighter — prompted the ministry to dispatch two F-16s to intercept the Chinese fighters, KMT legislators said Beijing would not seek to provoke Taiwan at a time when relations in the Taiwan Strait are “at their best in decades.”
KMT Legislator Herman Shuai (帥化民), for one, said the incident was likely the result of pilot error.
A US Department of Defense spokesperson confirmed to the Taipei Times on Tuesday that a U-2 aircraft from the US Air Force was conducting a routine operation in international airspace in the area of the East China Sea on June 29.
As a matter of policy, the US official would not discuss details of specific missions or operations.
“In general, these reconnaissance flights are conducted in international airspace, as are the People’s Republic of China intercepts, which happen fairly routinely,” the spokesperson said. “There is no ‘repel’ aspect to them.”
US Pacific Command (PACOM), which has operational control of the surveillance flights, also confirmed the information.
A PACOM official contacted for comment said it would be inappropriate to speculate on the reasons why Chinese aircraft crossed the centerline in this particular incident.
Beijing has repeatedly called on Washington to cease the surveillance flights, claiming they infringe on its sovereignty and since 2007 China has frequently dispatched fighter aircraft close to the median line when such US surveillance flights occurred.
Asked to comment on the significance of last month’s incident, Roger Cliff, a specialist on the Chinese air force at the Project 2049 Institute, said it was more provocative than Taipei let on.
“Unless China has frequently done so in the past, which I doubt, crossing the centerline to shadow a U-2 is rather provocative,” he said. “I can’t think of any reason why China would start to do that at this particular time, but Beijing does regularly complain about intelligence and reconnaissance activities conducted against it, even when they are conducted in international waters or airspace. It is getting more assertive in its efforts to prevent them.”
Whether this was an isolated incident or another sign of China’s growing assertiveness, Taiwan should take this very seriously, Cliff said.
“Taiwan wouldn’t want the regularity with which such incidents [could] occur to cause them to stop responding. One day it might not be a probe, but rather the beginning of an actual attack on Taiwan,” he said.
Less alarmed by the incident was Gary Li, an intelligence analyst at UK-based Exclusive Analysis.
“The PLAAF [People’s Liberation Army Air Force] guys didn’t really do anything too aggressive, with one of them straying over the line for a little while,” he said, cautioning, however, that this could just be the agreed report given by both sides to avoid escalating the situation.
Asked to comment on the reasons why, barring pilot error, the PLAAF would have allowed one of its aircraft to cross the median line at this particular point in time, Li offered a number of possibilities, starting with the position that China would not have made the decision to violate the centerline lightly.
“Beijing could be sending a message to the US in light of the developments in the South China Sea by harassing their routine intelligence assets” in a matter reminiscent of the “harassing” of the USS Impeccable, a US naval survey ship, by five Chinese vessels off Hainan Island in March 2009, he said.
Another possibility, Li said, was that the U-2 was gathering intelligence that was highly sensitive — perhaps new missiles being deployed or new naval assets — which could have forced the Chinese to be more daring than they normally are.
It could also be that the frequency of surveillance missions by the US has recently increased, he said.
“Even though U-2 flights are routine, they still can monitor inland intelligence due to their altitude. So the argument that they were in international airspace doesn’t really mean much to the Chinese as far as intelligence preservation is concerned,” he said.
Li speculated that the two PLAAF aircraft were not Su-27s, but rather J-11s, as the 17,500m ceiling of the aging Su-27 would make it hard to threaten the high-altitude U-2, which usually operates at about 21,000m.
The J-11, a Chinese variant of the Russian-made Su-27, has an operational ceiling of 18,500m and is equipped with medium-range air-to-air missiles. Nanchang-Xiangtang Air Base has both Su-27UBK and J-11 aircraft.
If this was the case, the PLAAF may have wanted to demonstrate to the US that China now has the capability to threaten its high-altitude assets, Li said.
The Ministry of Finance this afternoon announced the winning numbers for the March-April uniform invoice lottery. The winning number for the NT$10 million (US$318,060) special prize is 19531471, and the winning number for the NT$2 million grand prize is 85941329. Three numbers were drawn for the NT$200,000 first prize: 07225810, 20231230 and 83518781. Those with receipts matching the last seven digits of any of the first-prize numbers will win the NT$40,000 second prize, while those matching the last six digits will win the NT$10,000 third prize. Those whose receipts match the last five digits of the first-prize numbers can claim the NT$4,000 fourth prize,
SIX SUBSIDIES: The monthly allowance for older farmers is to increase to NT$10,000, and NT$5,000 is to be given to homemakers under the national pension system, Lai said The government is to implement major welfare policies for disadvantaged groups, including raising the monthly allowance for older farmers to NT$10,000 and providing homemakers with NT$5,000 per month, President William Lai (賴清德) said yesterday. Lai made the remarks during a visit to Wangling Temple in Chiayi County, saying that the planned increases were being introduced amid economic growth and an increase in tax revenue. Touting a policy, in which the government plans to provide a monthly allowance of NT$5,000 for every child under the age of 18 in a bid to address Taiwan’s low birthrate, Lai said that if received for the
STAY COOL: The HPA recommended that people stay hydrated, use air-conditioning or fans while indoors, wear loose-fitting clothes and walk in the shade while outdoors Employers must implement measures such as installing cooling equipment, and providing drinking water and rest breaks for outdoor workers starting from Monday next week, the Taipei Department of Labor said on Sunday. Employers who fail to comply could face fines of NT$30,000 to NT$300,000 under the Occupational Safety and Health Act (職業安全衛生法), the department said. Businesses in Taipei employing fewer than 100 workers, as well as registered self-employed workers with labor insurance coverage, could receive on-site assessments and guidance from occupational safety consultants to help them apply for central government subsidies to implement or improve heat-protection measures, it said. Under the Ministry of
ISOLATION: The outposts would serve as support and backup bases, forcing US forces to either face China head-on or reroute, increasing travel time and operational costs China’s outposts in the South China Sea could be used to delay and constrain foreign forces during a conflict in the Taiwan Strait, giving Beijing a critical window to carry out amphibious landing and blockade operations, a report said. The Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) forward operating bases on islands and reclaimed features in the South China Sea could delay foreign forces long enough for the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to secure a key 48-to-72-hour window in the Taiwan Strait, a report commissioned by the Mainland Affairs Council found. The report, conducted by the Institute for National Defense and Security Research, examined
RSS