Mon, Dec 27, 2010 - Page 2 News List

‘Comfort Women’ still fighting

NEVER GIVE UPWhile the Japanese government has yet to take responsibility for forcing women to serve as sex slaves, the women hope they will receive an apology

By Mo Yan-chih  /  Staff Reporter

President Ma Ying-jeou, second right, attends the opening of an exhibition yesterday at the Taipei City Police Department’s branch in Datong that chronicles the legal battle of former Taiwanese “comfort women” against the Japanese government.

Photo: Wang Min-wei, Taipei Times

When the Tokyo High Court rejected a lawsuit by a small group of elderly Taiwanese “comfort women” in 2004, Cheng Chen-tao (鄭陳桃), one of the plaintiffs, burst into tears in the courtroom.

Six years later, 89-year-old Cheng is still angred by the defeat, but said she and other comfort women would continue the decade-long legal battle against the Japanese government.

“I will not acknowledge defeat even though the court rejected our claims. I was forced to be a comfort woman when I was a student and I suffered all my life. It’s unacceptable that the Japanese government still refuses to apologize for what it did,” she said yesterday at an exhibition at the Taipei City Police Department’s Datong (大同) branch chronicling the women’s legal battle.

Cheng is one of 13 Taiwanese comfort women still alive. She joined eight other women to file a lawsuit against the Japanese government in 2001 for “recruiting” — most often through deception and coercion — tens of thousands of women from its colonies and occupied areas to serve as military sex slaves during World War II.

Cheng said she traveled all the way from Pingtung to attend the opening of the exhibition and asked for President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) assistance to help the surviving comfort women find justice and dignity.

“We flew to Japan several times, but they would not let us victims testify in court,” she said.

With the assistance from the Taipei Women’s Rescue Foundation, a non-profit organization that helped support the women’s case, the plaintiffs demanded ¥10 million (US$80,300) each in damages and an official apology from the Japanese government. However, Tokyo refused to admit it had recruited comfort women and has declined requests for an apology or compensation.

“These grandmothers don’t want monetary compensation from the Japanese government. They only ask for an official apology,” foundation chairwoman Liao Ying-chih (廖英智) said.

Speaking at the opening of the exhibition, Ma said he regretted the Japanese government’s failure to acknowledge its mistakes and promised to seek justice for the women.

“It is the responsibility of the Japanese government to admit its mistakes and apologize … The battle is not over yet and it is regretful that the Japanese government still refuses to face its mistakes,” he said.

Germany has made efforts to confront its historical atrocities and even puts details of concentration camps in history textbooks, Ma said.

“It is a great pity that there are places or nations that have not achieved this stage,” he said.

Ma said it was important for governments to address their mistakes and promised that as president he would not avoid major incidents in Taiwan’s history, including the 228 Massacre and the White Terror era.

“We can forgive historical mistakes, but history cannot be forgotten. The government should not be afraid [to face] disgraceful events and it should not avoid its responsibility to offer a formal apology,” he said.

Ma praised the three comfort women who were present yesterday for their courage and held a private discussion with them after the ceremony.

Liao said that during the past year, the foundation has been seeking assistance from the Japanese Diet in the hope that laws can be passed to oblige Tokyo to apologize for the country’s treatment of the comfort women.

This story has been viewed 10756 times.

Comments will be moderated. Keep comments relevant to the article. Remarks containing abusive and obscene language, personal attacks of any kind or promotion will be removed and the user banned. Final decision will be at the discretion of the Taipei Times.

TOP top