Tue, Aug 25, 2009 page3

• MORAKOT: THE AFTERMATH: Activists slam Cabinet’s reconstruction bill

  VIEW FROM AFAR One key criticism of the proposal is that no attempt was made to involve local communities in the reconstruction of their own homes and regions

  • By Loa Iok-sin, Shih Hsiu-chuan and Flora Wang / STAFF REPORTERS
  • • 
    • 
    • 

  Civic, environmental and Aboriginal groups slammed the Cabinet yesterday over its proposed typhoon reconstruction bill, saying the proposal lacks a mechanism to involve victims in the rebuilding of their hometowns.

  To speed up the reconstruction of areas devastated by Typhoon Morakot, the Cabinet’s bill aims to coordinate efforts among central and local government authorities, allowing reconstruction to be exempt from several laws the Cabinet believes would slow down the process. The bill would also provide a legal basis for banning human habitation in risky areas and for forced eviction of communities from those areas.

  The Cabinet plans to spend as much as NT$100 billion (US$30 billion) on reconstruction.

  Many non-governmental groups have attacked the Cabinet’s plan.

  “The reconstruction bill is nothing more than a bill to expand government power and to waste taxpayers’ money,” Green Party Taiwan Secretary-General Pan Han-shen (潘翰聲) told a forum yesterday.

  The bill “gives overwhelming power to an incapable government,” he said.

  Pan said that waiving laws such as the Urban Planning Act (都市計劃法), Water Conservancy Act (水利法) and Environmental Impact Assessment Act (環境影響評估法) could turn the reconstruction effort into an environmental disaster that might trigger more severe devastation in future.

  “We needed to rescue victims as quickly as possible, but our incapable government failed to do so. And while we need to carefully plan reconstruction to prevent future disasters, the government is trying to do it too hastily,” Pan said.

  ‘HORRIBLE BILL’

  Tseng Hsu-cheng (曾旭正), chairman of Community Empowering Society Taiwan, said compared with the Provisional Act Governing Reconstruction After the 921 Earthquake (九二一震災重建暫行條例) adopted 10 years ago, “the draft typhoon reconstruction bill is horrible.”

  “I think the reconstruction bill would have been much better if the Cabinet just spent one night copying the 921 reconstruction bill,” Tseng said.

  He said there has been no attempt to involve local communities in the reconstruction or rebuild local industries.

  Yabi Dali, a social worker who has worked in isolated communities in the Alishan (阿里山) area, agreed.

  “Government officials are talking about resettling entire villages while the villagers who are still cut off from the outside don’t know about the plan,” she said.

  “The reconstruction effort should not only coordinate different local and central government agencies, but should also involve representatives of the communities to be reconstructed,” she said.

  Lahuy Icyeh, secretary of the Smangus Aboriginal Community Development Association, said community members should be allowed to rebuild their own houses.

  Since about 80 percent of the disaster areas are in Aboriginal regions, Lahuy called on the government to respect Aborigines’ wishes to rebuild their communities near where they used to live if it’s not possible to rebuild the communities on the former sites.

  “Don’t think that it’s good for the survivors if you move them somewhere close to a 7-Eleven or McDonald’s,” he said.

  Liglove Awu, a member of the Alliance for Reconstruction of Aboriginal Communities in Southern Taiwan, said that since the Council of Indigenous Peoples has conducted a survey of traditional Aboriginal domains, “you can always resettle Aboriginal communities somewhere safe within their traditional domains instead of moving everybody to the plains.”

  PRESERVE CULTURE

  Huang Chih-hui (黃智慧), a board member of the Millet Foundation — which promotes and preserves indigenous cultures — urged the government to also pay attention to reconstruction and preservation of culture.

  “The disaster has not only destroyed buildings and landscape in Aborigine communities, but also threatened their culture,” Huang said. “Places for holding important ceremonies, historic events, or myths may just disappear after communities are resettled.”

  The activists will deliver copies of their suggestion to all 112 legislators and party caucus offices at 9am today.

  Executive Yuan Spokesman Su Jun-pin (蘇俊賓) said the government has no plan to change the makeup of the post-Typhoon Morakot Reconstruction Committee but promised that the opinions of local governments and victims were important to the commission.

  The 31-member committee, which will be chaired by Premier Liu Chao-shiuan (劉兆玄), will have 30 officials from different government agencies, plus the heads of Delta Electronics, Uni-President Enterprises Corp, Taiwan High Speed Rail, China Steel and one university president and four professors.

  Su said the committee would keep in close contact with each local reconstruction committee in typhoon-affected county or city governments so that victims can have their say on the relocation of their villages and other reconstruction projects.

  The Executive Yuan will listen to what local governments and victims have to say and take their opinions seriously before any decision is made at the committee level, Su said.

  The opinion of victims’ opinions is the main principle guiding of the committee and was more important than having two or three victims on the committee as a symbolic gesture, Su said.

  Meanwhile, Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng (王金平) criticized the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) caucus’ suggestion that the central government seek unlimited funding for post-Morakot reconstruction.

  “It is impossible to grant the central government an unlimited budget, but we can maintain certain degree of flexibility,” Wang said.

  “For example, [the Executive Yuan planned to seek] NT$100 billion [US$3 billion], but the DPP wants a minimum of NT$200 billion. Legislators can negotiate and finalize an amount that could help reorganize and restore our land and complete the disaster relief and reconstruction,” he said.

  NEGOTIATIONS

  Wang said he would convene a negotiation session this morning before the legislature’s extraordinary session to review the Cabinet’s special budget request begins in the afternoon.

  Lawmakers are scheduled to complete the review by Thursday, which would support the government’s plan to take out loans for reconstruction effort.

  DPP caucus whip Wang Sing-nan (王幸男) said putting a cap on reconstruction spending would be irresponsible.

  “The cost of the reconstruction plans proposed by Chiayi, Tainan, Kaohsiung and Pingtung county governments exceeds NT$90 billion. This figure does not include the reconstruction plan for Taitung or the repairs of roads and bridges under the jurisdiction of the central government,” Wang Sing-nan said.

  The DPP lawmaker said the Executive Yuan’s proposed budget would not be enough to cover the reconstruction work, since it took about NT$210 billion to rebuild homes and infrastructures after the 921 Earthquake.

  Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Lin Yi-shih (林益世), however, said the amount of budget was negotiable.
• Most Popular

  • 1

    Roadside saliva tests to begin by end of the year

  • 2

    Torrential rain expected this week, the CWA says

  • 3

    Monkeys down Brothers to take 2-0 lead in series

  • 4

    Urban mining could evade China’s grip

  • 5

    Registration for NT$10,000 to open on Nov. 5