The Consumers’ Foundation yesterday urged the government to place eggs under certain regulations, as a survey showed that more than 70 percent of egg vendors at local markets fail to specify the nutritional information.
The foundation recently conducted a survey on 25 brands of eggs and found that product information was not clearly stated.
“Seventy-one percent of the samples did not identify the nutritional contents, partly because the Food Sanitation and Management Law does not include packaged eggs as packaged food, thus freeing companies from labeling the ingredients,” foundation chairman Chen Jen-hung (程仁宏) said.
“Eggs with a ‘healthy eggs’ label should also be regulated by the Health Food Control Act,” said Chen, citing the importance of transparency on product information.
With the increasing popularity of organic products, many farms claim that their eggs have all kinds of nutritional value, but few provide proof, the survey showed.
Chen said that 13 of the 25 samples were labeled “healthy eggs” and boasted of a wide variety of health claims, such as “full of vitamins,” but failed to inform the consumer of the actual nutritional content.
“The label ‘full of vitamin A,’ for example, should mean it contains more than 180 micrograms of that ingredient in every 100ml of egg, based on the act governing health food,” Chen said.
As for samples claiming to contain antioxidants, Chen said they should be better monitored to see if the claims were true.
Some of the samples do not provide complete and truthful information, Chen said, adding that the “Health Food Control Act bans product information that misleads consumers.”
The foundation also said that there were “no real” organic eggs on the local market.
“Organic food must come from farms that are licensed as organic ones, and at present no chicken farm in Taiwan has obtained such a license,” Chen said.
FAST TRACK? Chinese spouses must renounce their Chinese citizenship and pledge allegiance to Taiwan to gain citizenship, some demonstrators said Opponents and supporters of a bill that would allow Chinese spouses to obtain Taiwanese citizenship in four years instead of six staged protests near the Legislative Yuan in Taipei yesterday morning. Those who oppose the bill proposed by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) demanded that Chinese spouses be granted citizenship only after renouncing their Chinese citizenship, passing a citizenship test and pledging allegiance to Taiwan. The demonstrators, who were protesting at a side entrance to the Legislative Yuan on Jinan Road, were mostly members of the Taiwan Association of University Professors and other organizations advocating Taiwanese independence. Supporters of the bill, led
SILENT MAJORITY: Only 1 percent of Chinese rejected all options but war to annex Taiwan, while one-third viewed war as unacceptable, a university study showed Many Chinese are more concerned with developments inside their country than with seeking unification with Taiwan, al-Jazeera reported on Friday. Although China claims Taiwan as its own territory and has vowed to annex it, by force if necessary, 23-year-old Chinese Shao Hongtian was quoted by al-Jazeera as saying that “hostilities are not the way to bring China and Taiwan together.” “I want unification to happen peacefully,” Shao said. Al-Jazeera said it changed Shao’s name to respect his wish for anonymity. If peaceful unification is not possible, Shao said he would prefer “things to remain as they are,” adding that many of his friends feel
Taiwan has “absolute air superiority” over China in its own airspace, Deputy Minister of National Defense Po Horng-huei (柏鴻輝) told a meeting of the legislature’s Foreign Affairs and National Defense Committee on Monday, amid concern over whether Taipei could defend itself against a military incursion by Beijing. Po made the remarks in response to a question from Democratic Progressive Party Legislator Chiu Chih-wei (邱志偉) on whether Taiwan would have partial or complete air superiority if Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) warplanes were to enter Taiwan’s airspace. Po, a retired pilot, said that the Taiwanese military has “absolute air superiority” over PLA
A shipment of basil pesto imported by Costco Wholesale Taiwan from the US in the middle of last month was intercepted at the border after testing positive for excessive pesticide residue, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) said yesterday. Samples taken from a shipment of the Kirkland Signature brand of basil pesto imported by Costco contained 0.1 milligrams per kilogram of ethylene oxide, exceeding the non-detectable limit. Ethylene oxide is a carcinogenic substance that can be used as a pesticide. The 674kg shipment of basil pesto would either be destroyed or returned to its country of origin, as is the procedure for all