Fri, Jul 20, 2007 page2

• EPA accused of `stalling tactics' during protest

  FED UP An Environmental Impact Assessment Committee member and other former members claimed important cases are intentionally ignored

  • By Angelica Oung / STAFF REPORTER
  • • 
    • 
    • 

  Alleging the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) deliberately kept important cases off the Environmental Impact Assessment Committee's (EIAC) agenda, a member of the committee protested outside the agency yesterday rather than attend the committee's last meeting.

  Gloria Hsu (徐光蓉), Taiwan Environmental Protection Union chairwoman, said the EPA's "stalling tactics" means that environmental damaging construction projects likely to be rejected by committee could be approved by the next committee, whose members have yet to be convened.

  Each EIAC has a two-year tenure, after which a new committee is selected by the head of the EPA.

  

  Anti-Supermen express their anger at the Environmental Protection Agency yesterday to protest what they said was the Environmental Impact Assessment Committee's reluctance to tackle tough cases.

  PHOTO: CNA

  "What is the point of attending the meeting?" Hsu said.

  "Only five insignificant cases are discussed while many important cases that should have been brought before the committee languished," she said.

  She was joined by former committee member Thomas Chan (詹順貴) and a crowd of protesters. Chan resigned from the committee last month in protest.

  Both Hsu and Chan tied pieces of red fabric bearing the words "Environmental assessment is already dead," around their forehead.

  Hsu accused the EPA of avoiding placing cases such as Formosa Plastic Groups' steelworks, the conjunctive utilization plan of Surface water and groundwater in the Chuoshui River alluvial fan and others before the current committee.

  "They want to drag these cases out so that they will not go before this committee," Hsu said.

  "I heard that our committee has been dubbed `the obstacle committee,'" he said.

  "Are they delaying important cases from coming before the committee until it reconvenes with more business-friendly members?" Hsu said, "Why else are the keeping important cases from being heard?"

  Also at the protest was the secretary-general of the TEPU, Ho Tsung-hsun (何宗勳).

  "The EPA is derelict in its duty to protect the environment in Taiwan," Ho said, describing the agency as a "soft-legged shrimp" in the case of the sixth naphtha plant.

  The agency previously meted out fines in March that was subsequently revoked by the Executive Yuan, Ho said.

  At yesterday's press conference, EPA Deputy Director Chang Tzi-chin (張子敬) said the tenure of the current committee was about to end, meaning that there would not be enough time for the case of the sixth naphtha plant to come before it. However, Chang said the new limits will not necessarily be the 351,000 ton limit approved by the Industrial Development Bureau of the Ministry of Economic Affairs.

  "It is up to the new committee, yet to be convened, to decide what the upper limit of water use could be for the sixth naphtha plant," Chang said.

  Although fellow committee member Robin Winkler did not join Hsu's protest and attended the yesterday's meeting, he did offer a show of solidarity.

  Coming down from the 13th floor where the meeting took place, Winkler ripped up a copy of the Basic Environmental Act (環境基本法) and shouted "Environmental assessment is dead."
• Most Popular

  • 1

    Chinese ships expelled from near Pratas Island

  • 2

    Taiwan to lose 6.67m workers in two retirement waves

  • 3

    ‘Fujian’ carrier to pose steep defense challenge

  • 4

    Cash handouts could start next month

  • 5

    AIT comments on Taiwan accurate: State Department