The Ministry of Education's (MOE) decision this month to first ban public-school restrictions on permissible hairstyles and later lift those on shoes and socks for secondary-school students, sparked debate on whether students should be given total freedom over their appearance.
While many schools hesitated to carry out the new policy, the lifting of the hair and dress regulations has officially put an end to an outdated era and granted students the right to determine their own hairstyles and appearance.
Looking back at the history of the country's hair and dress regulations, the ban on students' hairstyles and dress was first introduced in 1969 by the ministry, and is now considered to be a relic of authoritarianism. According to hair-regulation criteria between 1969 and 1978, as provided by the MOE, secondary-school boys were required to sport crew cuts, there had to be no hair on their temples and strange hairstyles were not allowed. Girls' hair, on the other hand, had to be ear-length and neither dyed nor permed.
TAIPEI TIMES FILE PHOTO BY CHEN CHING-MIN
The ministry in 1984 issued an official dress code for secondary-school students. While there was no detailed requirements, the ministry requested that students' clothes be "neat," "simple" and "graceful."
Six months before the then-ruling Chinese Nationalist Party lifted martial law in 1987, the MOE banned hair regulations at secondary schools. The announcement stated that secondary-school students' hairstyles should be "simple, neat and easy to freshen up." But "schools can draw up their own regulations based on the above principles and opinions from teachers, students and parent representatives."
Schools continued to enforce strict rules, and rushing to get haircuts or preparing white shoes and socks the night before their schools' appearance-checkup day has remained a school memory for most Taiwanese people.
"Our director of student affairs once cut a student's hair during a hair checkup in front of everybody, because he used styling gel on his hair. My teacher even asked a barber to come to school and give each of us a haircut to make sure our hairstyles conformed to school rules," said Jimmy Chuang (
Jimmy said that while the school informed them about the MOE's policy, hair regulations continued to be enforced even though students were allowed to sport their hair a little longer. Every month at schools' morning rally, the director of student affairs or instructors would do a routine hair and dress checkup. Students who failed the checkup would be punished with points deducted from their grades.
"Having to get a haircut at least once a month was a hassle. But I think most of my male classmates felt OK with the crew-cut hairstyle," Chuang said.
"Girls hated the hair regulations more because their prescribed hairstyle gave them `watermelon heads,' and it was not pretty," he said. Years after the ministry's first official ban on hair regulations, secondary-school boys no longer need to sport the crew-cut hairstyle and girls can wear their hair to at least shoulder-length.
But most schools never gave up the authority to exercise proper discipline regarding students' appearance. It seems that most of the schools decided to stick to their guns when education officials this time around chose to stand firmly on the side of students' hairstyle rights when the legitimacy of the regulations was questioned by students in a protest last month.
Many secondary-school principals were surprised at Education Minister Tu Cheng-sheng's (
Some schools' principals called the changes a "travesty of education in the guise of democracy." A number of them vowed to maintain existing regulations.
Tan Guang-ding (
"But I do not agree that hair regulations are a violation of students' human rights. Students come to school to receive an education and proper discipline. Schools' authority over students' hairstyles should not be denied," Tan said.
Facing a cool response from school principals, Vice Minister of Education Fan Sun-lu (
Fan called on schools to give students the right to choose their own hairstyles, given that this is a democratic society.
"This was consistent with the idea that schools aim at teaching students to be responsible members of society by making decisions for themselves and thinking on their own," she said.
As many school principals hesitated to give up their authority over students' hair, however, hairstyle rights advocates may need to continue their fight until students can express themselves through various hairstyles without any restraints.
The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) yesterday reported the first case of a new COVID-19 subvariant — BA.3.2 — in a 10-year-old Singaporean girl who had a fever upon arrival in Taiwan and tested positive for the disease. The girl left Taiwan on March 20 and the case did not have a direct impact on the local community, it said. The WHO added the BA.3.2 strain to its list of Variants Under Monitoring in December last year, but this was the first imported case of the COVID-19 variant in Taiwan, CDC Deputy Director-General Lin Ming-cheng (林明誠) said. The girl arrived in Taiwan on
South Korea is planning to revise its controversial electronic arrival card, a step Taiwanese officials said prompted them to hold off on planned retaliatory measures, a South Korean media report said yesterday. A Yonhap News Agency report said that the South Korean Ministry of Foreign Affairs is planning to remove the “previous departure place” and “next destination” fields from its e-arrival card system. The plan, reached after interagency consultations, is under review and aims to simplify entry procedures and align the electronic form with the paper version, a South Korean ministry official said. The fields — which appeared only on the electronic form
The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) is suspending retaliation measures against South Korea that were set to take effect tomorrow, after Seoul said it is updating its e-arrival system, MOFA said today. The measures were to be a new round of retaliation after Taiwan on March 1 changed South Korea's designation on government-issued alien resident certificates held by South Korean nationals to "South Korea” from the "Republic of Korea," the country’s official name. The move came after months of protests to Seoul over its listing of Taiwan as "China (Taiwan)" in dropdown menus on its new online immigration entry system. MOFA last week
A bipartisan group of US senators has introduced a bill to enhance cooperation with Taiwan on drone development and to reduce reliance on supply chains linked to China. The proposed Blue Skies for Taiwan Act of 2026 was introduced by Republican US senators Ted Cruz and John Curtis, and Democratic US senators Jeff Merkley and Andy Kim. The legislation seeks to ease constraints on Taiwan-US cooperation in uncrewed aerial systems (UAS), including dependence on China-sourced components, limited access to capital and regulatory barriers under US export controls, a news release issued by Cruz on Wednesday said. The bill would establish a "Blue UAS