The Ministry of Education's (MOE) decision this month to first ban public-school restrictions on permissible hairstyles and later lift those on shoes and socks for secondary-school students, sparked debate on whether students should be given total freedom over their appearance.
While many schools hesitated to carry out the new policy, the lifting of the hair and dress regulations has officially put an end to an outdated era and granted students the right to determine their own hairstyles and appearance.
Looking back at the history of the country's hair and dress regulations, the ban on students' hairstyles and dress was first introduced in 1969 by the ministry, and is now considered to be a relic of authoritarianism. According to hair-regulation criteria between 1969 and 1978, as provided by the MOE, secondary-school boys were required to sport crew cuts, there had to be no hair on their temples and strange hairstyles were not allowed. Girls' hair, on the other hand, had to be ear-length and neither dyed nor permed.
TAIPEI TIMES FILE PHOTO BY CHEN CHING-MIN
The ministry in 1984 issued an official dress code for secondary-school students. While there was no detailed requirements, the ministry requested that students' clothes be "neat," "simple" and "graceful."
Six months before the then-ruling Chinese Nationalist Party lifted martial law in 1987, the MOE banned hair regulations at secondary schools. The announcement stated that secondary-school students' hairstyles should be "simple, neat and easy to freshen up." But "schools can draw up their own regulations based on the above principles and opinions from teachers, students and parent representatives."
Schools continued to enforce strict rules, and rushing to get haircuts or preparing white shoes and socks the night before their schools' appearance-checkup day has remained a school memory for most Taiwanese people.
"Our director of student affairs once cut a student's hair during a hair checkup in front of everybody, because he used styling gel on his hair. My teacher even asked a barber to come to school and give each of us a haircut to make sure our hairstyles conformed to school rules," said Jimmy Chuang (
Jimmy said that while the school informed them about the MOE's policy, hair regulations continued to be enforced even though students were allowed to sport their hair a little longer. Every month at schools' morning rally, the director of student affairs or instructors would do a routine hair and dress checkup. Students who failed the checkup would be punished with points deducted from their grades.
"Having to get a haircut at least once a month was a hassle. But I think most of my male classmates felt OK with the crew-cut hairstyle," Chuang said.
"Girls hated the hair regulations more because their prescribed hairstyle gave them `watermelon heads,' and it was not pretty," he said. Years after the ministry's first official ban on hair regulations, secondary-school boys no longer need to sport the crew-cut hairstyle and girls can wear their hair to at least shoulder-length.
But most schools never gave up the authority to exercise proper discipline regarding students' appearance. It seems that most of the schools decided to stick to their guns when education officials this time around chose to stand firmly on the side of students' hairstyle rights when the legitimacy of the regulations was questioned by students in a protest last month.
Many secondary-school principals were surprised at Education Minister Tu Cheng-sheng's (
Some schools' principals called the changes a "travesty of education in the guise of democracy." A number of them vowed to maintain existing regulations.
Tan Guang-ding (
"But I do not agree that hair regulations are a violation of students' human rights. Students come to school to receive an education and proper discipline. Schools' authority over students' hairstyles should not be denied," Tan said.
Facing a cool response from school principals, Vice Minister of Education Fan Sun-lu (
Fan called on schools to give students the right to choose their own hairstyles, given that this is a democratic society.
"This was consistent with the idea that schools aim at teaching students to be responsible members of society by making decisions for themselves and thinking on their own," she said.
As many school principals hesitated to give up their authority over students' hair, however, hairstyle rights advocates may need to continue their fight until students can express themselves through various hairstyles without any restraints.
FAST TRACK? Chinese spouses must renounce their Chinese citizenship and pledge allegiance to Taiwan to gain citizenship, some demonstrators said Opponents and supporters of a bill that would allow Chinese spouses to obtain Taiwanese citizenship in four years instead of six staged protests near the Legislative Yuan in Taipei yesterday morning. Those who oppose the bill proposed by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) demanded that Chinese spouses be granted citizenship only after renouncing their Chinese citizenship, passing a citizenship test and pledging allegiance to Taiwan. The demonstrators, who were protesting at a side entrance to the Legislative Yuan on Jinan Road, were mostly members of the Taiwan Association of University Professors and other organizations advocating Taiwanese independence. Supporters of the bill, led
SILENT MAJORITY: Only 1 percent of Chinese rejected all options but war to annex Taiwan, while one-third viewed war as unacceptable, a university study showed Many Chinese are more concerned with developments inside their country than with seeking unification with Taiwan, al-Jazeera reported on Friday. Although China claims Taiwan as its own territory and has vowed to annex it, by force if necessary, 23-year-old Chinese Shao Hongtian was quoted by al-Jazeera as saying that “hostilities are not the way to bring China and Taiwan together.” “I want unification to happen peacefully,” Shao said. Al-Jazeera said it changed Shao’s name to respect his wish for anonymity. If peaceful unification is not possible, Shao said he would prefer “things to remain as they are,” adding that many of his friends feel
Taiwan has “absolute air superiority” over China in its own airspace, Deputy Minister of National Defense Po Horng-huei (柏鴻輝) told a meeting of the legislature’s Foreign Affairs and National Defense Committee on Monday, amid concern over whether Taipei could defend itself against a military incursion by Beijing. Po made the remarks in response to a question from Democratic Progressive Party Legislator Chiu Chih-wei (邱志偉) on whether Taiwan would have partial or complete air superiority if Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) warplanes were to enter Taiwan’s airspace. Po, a retired pilot, said that the Taiwanese military has “absolute air superiority” over PLA
A shipment of basil pesto imported by Costco Wholesale Taiwan from the US in the middle of last month was intercepted at the border after testing positive for excessive pesticide residue, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) said yesterday. Samples taken from a shipment of the Kirkland Signature brand of basil pesto imported by Costco contained 0.1 milligrams per kilogram of ethylene oxide, exceeding the non-detectable limit. Ethylene oxide is a carcinogenic substance that can be used as a pesticide. The 674kg shipment of basil pesto would either be destroyed or returned to its country of origin, as is the procedure for all