Taiwan's mayors and county commissioners split across party lines yesterday in reaction to the passage of China's "anti-secession" law, although they were united in their opposition to the legislation.
The pan-green camp issued a joint statement signed by 17 regional leaders, while the pan-blue camp held an international press conference to publicize their "open letter" of protest.
Taipei Mayor Ma Ying-jeou (
The movement to consolidate the views of Taiwan's regional leaders began when acting Kaohsiung Mayor Chen Chi-mai (
The two documents signed yesterday highlighted the differences between political camps, despite their common position in the face of the passage of the anti-secession law. All 14 of the nation's pan-blue regional leaders or their representatives showed up at yesterday's Taipei City Government press conference to sign Ma's open letter. Six of the 17 signatories of the Chen-initiated statement, meanwhile, were pan-blue regional chiefs who also co-signed Ma's open letter.
Regardless of differences in political motives, both the open letter initiated by Ma and the statement drafted by Chen emphasized that China needs to recognize the sovereignty of the Republic of China (ROC), that the anti-secession law clearly goes against the will of the Taiwanese people and that the anti-secession law cannot help the cross-strait situation.
In Chen's joint statement, titled "Safeguarding Democracy and Peace, Opposing Military Annexation: An Objection to China's Anti-Secession Law," the crux of the problem in cross-strait relations was identified as China's refusal to recognize the ROC's sovereignty, China's use of its military might and missiles to threaten the peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait, and its use of aggressive means to sabotage Taiwan's international standing.
The statement also says that developing cross-strait peace and stability is not only the universal goal of the international community but also the common hope of the people on both sides of the Taiwan Strait. The joint statement urged Beijing to be prudent regarding enacting the "ill-intended" legislation.
Ma's letter to the international community, on the other hand, added that the majority of the Taiwanese people support the status quo, while emphasizing that it is only a minority of people that advocate Taiwanese independence.
During his press conference yesterday, Ma evaded questions asking why he did not sign the statement initiated by Chen, although some of the other pan-blue leaders present at the international press conference yesterday did.
Ma also used the press conference to clarify that he will attend the March 26 rally initiated by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP). He has already made his position on the anti-secession law clear in previous comments and in yesterdays open letter, Ma said. There is no further need for him to attend any activities to express his views, he said.
Meanwhile, Hu said he was still reserving judgment on whether or not he would attend the event.
The German city of Hamburg on Oct. 14 named a bridge “Kaohsiung-Brucke” after the Taiwanese city of Kaohsiung. The footbridge, formerly known as F566, is to the east of the Speicherstadt, the world’s largest warehouse district, and connects the Dar-es-Salaam-Platz to the Brooktorpromenade near the Port of Hamburg on the Elbe River. Timo Fischer, a Free Democratic Party member of the Hamburg-Mitte District Assembly, in May last year proposed the name change with support from members of the Social Democratic Party and the Christian Democratic Union. Kaohsiung and Hamburg in 1999 inked a sister city agreement, but despite more than a quarter-century of
Taiwanese officials are courting podcasters and influencers aligned with US President Donald Trump as they grow more worried the US leader could undermine Taiwanese interests in talks with China, people familiar with the matter said. Trump has said Taiwan would likely be on the agenda when he is expected to meet Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) next week in a bid to resolve persistent trade tensions. China has asked the White House to officially declare it “opposes” Taiwanese independence, Bloomberg reported last month, a concession that would mark a major diplomatic win for Beijing. President William Lai (賴清德) and his top officials
The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) yesterday expressed “grave concerns” after Singaporean Prime Minister Lawrence Wong (黃循財) reiterated the city-state’s opposition to “Taiwanese independence” during a meeting with Chinese Premier Li Qiang (李強). In Singapore on Saturday, Wong and Li discussed cross-strait developments, the Singaporean Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement. “Prime Minister Wong reiterated that Singapore has a clear and consistent ‘one China’ policy and is opposed to Taiwan independence,” it said. MOFA responded that it is an objective fact and a common understanding shared by many that the Republic of China (ROC) is an independent, sovereign nation, with world-leading
‘ONE CHINA’: A statement that Berlin decides its own China policy did not seem to sit well with Beijing, which offered only one meeting with the German official German Minister for Foreign Affairs Johann Wadephul’s trip to China has been canceled, a spokesperson for his ministry said yesterday, amid rising tensions between the two nations, including over Taiwan. Wadephul had planned to address Chinese curbs on rare earths during his visit, but his comments about Berlin deciding on the “design” of its “one China” policy ahead of the trip appear to have rankled China. Asked about Wadephul’s comments, Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesman Guo Jiakun (郭嘉昆) said the “one China principle” has “no room for any self-definition.” In the interview published on Thursday, Wadephul said he would urge China to
RSS