The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) does not have the right to represent the government in negotiations with China on the issue of Lunar New Year direct charter flights, and the Mainland Affairs Council should mete out discipline accordingly, Taiwan Solidarity Union (TSU) legislators said yesterday.
"The KMT's efforts to push for charter flights for the Lunar New Year clearly shows its intention to establish a negotiation mechanism with the Communist Party and violates the Statute Governing the Relations between the People of the Taiwan Area and the Mainland Area (台灣地區與大陸地區人民關係條例)," said TSU caucus whip Chen Chien-ming (陳建銘).
While the KMT has not been authorized by the government to negotiate the matter with Beijing, Chen said that the council should dish out punishment in accordance with the law.
The statue stipulates that the council can entrust a public service organization, which is "credible, professional and experienced," to help it handle cross-strait exchanges and related matters. The council also can, if necessary, authorize such an organization to sign an agreement on the government's behalf.
Violators can face a fine between NT$200,000 and NT$2 million. Serious or repeat offenders are subject to five years' imprisonment and/or a fine of up to NT$500,000.
Another TSU caucus whip, Huang Tsung-yuan (黃宗源), said that the KMT delegation owed the public an explanation of their credentials for the job.
"I'm very curious to know exactly whom they represent. Will they go [negotiate in China] as the nation's lawmakers or as an embassy of KMT Chairman Lien Chan (連戰), or represent the pan-blue camp?" Huang asked.
"If they represent the pan-blue camp, I'd like to know why the People First Party (PFP) is left out of the loop," he said.
Huang also called on the KMT not to angle for political interest nor to dash the hopes of China-based Taiwanese businesspeople who just want to come home for the Lunar New Year.
Commenting on the TSU's likening the KMT's efforts to establish a "KMT-Communist negotiation mechanism," KMT Vice Chairman and Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng (
"I think the KMT is involving itself in the negotiation process because it is worried about how effective a government-led negotiation would be," he said, adding that he knew nothing about the party's negotiation initiative.
Although the PFP has not been involved in the matter, the party's legislative caucus is gearing up for efforts to revamp the Statute Governing the Relations between the People of the Taiwan Area and the Mainland Area in a bid to pave the way for direct transportation links across the Taiwan Strait.
The caucus is planning to include legal revisions in the legislative agenda during today's Procedure Committee meeting, with the hope to pass it to committees for review.
Under the PFP's draft amendments, the nation's ships, aircraft and other forms of transportation could go to China without first obtaining permission from the government.
The PFP is also seeking to abolish an article banning foreign vessels, aircraft and other forms of transportation from traveling directly across the Strait. The current rule also applies to those vehicles rented, invested in or managed by Chinese individuals or institutions.
Meanwhile, Cabinet Spokesman Chen Chi-mai (陳其邁) yesterday said that the government was happy to hear the Chinese government's positive reaction to the Lunar New Year charter flight plan.
"Since it was announced in December last year that we hoped to see this year's New Year charter flight service follow the 2002 model, we've been hoping both sides can sit down and talk about more technical issues," Chen said.

The German city of Hamburg on Oct. 14 named a bridge “Kaohsiung-Brucke” after the Taiwanese city of Kaohsiung. The footbridge, formerly known as F566, is to the east of the Speicherstadt, the world’s largest warehouse district, and connects the Dar-es-Salaam-Platz to the Brooktorpromenade near the Port of Hamburg on the Elbe River. Timo Fischer, a Free Democratic Party member of the Hamburg-Mitte District Assembly, in May last year proposed the name change with support from members of the Social Democratic Party and the Christian Democratic Union. Kaohsiung and Hamburg in 1999 inked a sister city agreement, but despite more than a quarter-century of

Taiwanese officials are courting podcasters and influencers aligned with US President Donald Trump as they grow more worried the US leader could undermine Taiwanese interests in talks with China, people familiar with the matter said. Trump has said Taiwan would likely be on the agenda when he is expected to meet Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) next week in a bid to resolve persistent trade tensions. China has asked the White House to officially declare it “opposes” Taiwanese independence, Bloomberg reported last month, a concession that would mark a major diplomatic win for Beijing. President William Lai (賴清德) and his top officials

The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) yesterday expressed “grave concerns” after Singaporean Prime Minister Lawrence Wong (黃循財) reiterated the city-state’s opposition to “Taiwanese independence” during a meeting with Chinese Premier Li Qiang (李強). In Singapore on Saturday, Wong and Li discussed cross-strait developments, the Singaporean Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement. “Prime Minister Wong reiterated that Singapore has a clear and consistent ‘one China’ policy and is opposed to Taiwan independence,” it said. MOFA responded that it is an objective fact and a common understanding shared by many that the Republic of China (ROC) is an independent, sovereign nation, with world-leading

‘ONE CHINA’: A statement that Berlin decides its own China policy did not seem to sit well with Beijing, which offered only one meeting with the German official German Minister for Foreign Affairs Johann Wadephul’s trip to China has been canceled, a spokesperson for his ministry said yesterday, amid rising tensions between the two nations, including over Taiwan. Wadephul had planned to address Chinese curbs on rare earths during his visit, but his comments about Berlin deciding on the “design” of its “one China” policy ahead of the trip appear to have rankled China. Asked about Wadephul’s comments, Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesman Guo Jiakun (郭嘉昆) said the “one China principle” has “no room for any self-definition.” In the interview published on Thursday, Wadephul said he would urge China to