Noting that a peace treaty between the UK and Germany in 1938 did not prevent the two from going to war, Premier Su Tseng-chang (蘇貞昌) yesterday said that people should “heed history’s lessons and not repeat its mistakes.”
Su made the remark at the Legislative Yuan when asked for comment on the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) accusation on Thursday that by refusing to sign a cross-strait peace agreement, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) is “courting war and rejecting peace.”
“The KMT’s tone resembled that of [former British prime minister Neville] Chamberlain before he flew to Berlin and signed the agreement with Adolf Hitler,” Su said. “[Chamberlain] proudly brandished the agreement as he disembarked his airplane, only to see Hitler wage a war later.”
Photo: Chien Jung-fong, Taipei Times
Su was referring to the Munich Agreement spearheaded by Chamberlain in 1938 and signed by the UK, France, Italy and Nazi Germany, which pressed then-Czechoslovakia into ceding the Sudetenland.
Hitler at the time said that the Sudetenland was the last territorial claim he was to make in Europe, only to renege on the agreement and invade the rest of Czechoslovakia in 1939.
Within a year, Britain and France were at war with Germany.
Under the leadership of former British prime minister Winston Churchill, the UK fought long and hard before winning World War II, Su said, urging people to learn from history and not repeat its mistakes.
The KMT on Thursday posted on Facebook five questions it deemed most frequently asked about a possible cross-strait peace treaty and their answers.
One asked why the DPP is afraid of signing a peace treaty with Beijing.
“The DPP has to cover up for its incompetence and helplessness in maintaining cross-strait peace,” it said. “Does the DPP not want peace and only want war?”
Another asked what would be the guiding principles for inking such an agreement, which the KMT said would be signed under the precondition that the “sovereignty and dignity of the Republic of China are protected” and would conform with the Act Governing Relations Between the People of the Taiwan Area and the Mainland Area (臺灣地區與大陸地區人民關係條例).
Another asked whether the KMT, in its capacity as a political party, would sign a peace agreement with the Chinese Communist Party, to which the KMT said that only groups authorized by the government would be allowed to negotiate and sign such an agreement.
Regarding the need for referendums before negotiations and after the conclusion of talks, the KMT said that it did not rule out such a possibility.
“However, proposed amendments requiring a cross-strait peace treaty to be put to a referendum must be feasible and receive widespread public support,” it said.
The Executive Yuan earlier this week proposed amendments to the act, which would require a negotiation proposal to be approved by two-thirds of lawmakers, as well as a consultative referendum.
The draft amendments say that after the completion of negotiations, the draft agreement would require a vote by a quorum of at least three-quarters of the legislature and approval by three-quarters of legislators in attendance, before being put to a national referendum.
Regarding the question of whether a cross-strait peace treaty would be an agreement for “surrender or unification,” as some have claimed, the KMT said that such an association was the result of an attempt by the DPP and administration officials to stigmatize any deal.
While the post was likely meant to assuage public concern after criticism grew after KMT Chairman Wu Den-yih (吳敦義) signaled that the KMT could sign a peace agreement with Beijing if the party returns to power next year, it has seemingly backfired online.
As of press time last night, about 7,700 of 9,500 reactions to the post were “angry faces,” with many netizens saying that the KMT was treating people as if they are gullible.
NO HUMAN ERROR: After the incident, the Coast Guard Administration said it would obtain uncrewed aerial vehicles and vessels to boost its detection capacity Authorities would improve border control to prevent unlawful entry into Taiwan’s waters and safeguard national security, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) said yesterday after a Chinese man reached the nation’s coast on an inflatable boat, saying he “defected to freedom.” The man was found on a rubber boat when he was about to set foot on Taiwan at the estuary of Houkeng River (後坑溪) near Taiping Borough (太平) in New Taipei City’s Linkou District (林口), authorities said. The Coast Guard Administration’s (CGA) northern branch said it received a report at 6:30am yesterday morning from the New Taipei City Fire Department about a
IN BEIJING’S FAVOR: A China Coast Guard spokesperson said that the Chinese maritime police would continue to carry out law enforcement activities in waters it claims The Philippines withdrew its coast guard vessel from a South China Sea shoal that has recently been at the center of tensions with Beijing. BRP Teresa Magbanua “was compelled to return to port” from Sabina Shoal (Xianbin Shoal, 仙濱暗沙) due to bad weather, depleted supplies and the need to evacuate personnel requiring medical care, the Philippine Coast Guard (PCG) spokesman Jay Tarriela said yesterday in a post on X. The Philippine vessel “will be in tiptop shape to resume her mission” after it has been resupplied and repaired, Philippine Executive Secretary Lucas Bersamin, who heads the nation’s maritime council, said
REGIONAL STABILITY: Taipei thanked the Biden administration for authorizing its 16th sale of military goods and services to uphold Taiwan’s defense and safety The US Department of State has approved the sale of US$228 million of military goods and services to Taiwan, the US Department of Defense said on Monday. The state department “made a determination approving a possible Foreign Military Sale” to the Taipei Economic and Cultural Representative Office in the US for “return, repair and reshipment of spare parts and related equipment,” the defense department’s Defense Security Cooperation Agency said in a news release. Taiwan had requested the purchase of items and services which include the “return, repair and reshipment of classified and unclassified spare parts for aircraft and related equipment; US Government
More than 500 people on Saturday marched in New York in support of Taiwan’s entry to the UN, significantly more people than previous years. The march, coinciding with the ongoing 79th session of the UN General Assembly, comes close on the heels of growing international discourse regarding the meaning of UN Resolution 2758. Resolution 2758, adopted by the UN General Assembly in 1971, recognizes the People’s Republic of China (PRC) as the “only lawful representative of China.” It resulted in the Republic of China (ROC) losing its seat at the UN to the PRC. Taiwan has since been excluded from