President Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) apology to Aborigines yesterday was met with disappointment by Aboriginal rights advocates for failing to explicitly acknowledge Aboriginal sovereignty, with scattered protests outside the Presidential Office Building in Taipei.
“The problem is that [Tsai] has chosen not to return to [former president] Chen Shui-bian’s (陳水扁) New Partnership quasi-state relationship, not even mentioning it in her remarks,” said Association for Taiwan Indigenous People’s Policy president Yapasuyongu Akuyana, who is a Tsou.
Chen, of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), in 2002 signed a New Partnership Accord promising autonomy and partnership through state-to-state relationships with Aborigines, but the accord was ignored by the government of former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九).
Tsai yesterday promised an “equal relationship” and “equal talks” with Aborigines as part of a historic and transitional justice commission that she is to head, but stopped short of explicitly affirming Aboriginal sovereignty.
Akuyana said that both the site of the apology and Tsai’s chosen audience showed a disregard for Aboriginal sovereignty.
“The site she chose for the apology used to be the office of the Japanese colonial administration’s governor-general — as if [Aboriginal representatives] were coming for an audience with a monarch,” he said, adding that Tsai should have chosen a neutral setting or an Aboriginal village to show respect.
He also said Tsai mainly invited elected Aboriginal officials — rather than traditional leaders — to observe the event, adding that Republic of China administrative units were a key cause of division and social disruption in Aboriginal communities.
“How could [she] choose to apologize in front of the very people who are responsible for damaging the values and structure of traditional society?” he said, comparing Tsai’s action to “asking a ghost to get your medicine” (請鬼抓藥單).
While Tsai’s promise to establish a new legal service center for Aborigines was positive, her promise to address penalties for hunting non-protected animals ignored the fact that all convictions of Aboriginal hunters have been for hunting “protected” animals, he said.
Aboriginal rights advocates argue that Aboriginal sovereignty should entitle the hunters to exceptions from wildlife protection rules.
“What I saw today was a political show that was put on in an extremely bureaucratic fashion,” said Aboriginal Transitional Justice Alliance president Kumu Hacyo, an independent Tainan city councilor who caucuses with the DPP.
Tsai’s promises to further Aboriginal rights “lacked sincerity” and were “evasive,” because they were not backed up by concrete policy stances, with the president ignoring calls to pass legislation to provide a legal foundation for a proposed Aboriginal justice commission, Hacyo said.
She added that there was a substantial amount of “low-lying fruit” to pick from if Tsai wanted to demonstrate her resolve and spark a national conversation.
Kumu Hacyo cited eliminating state-sponsored sacrifices to Koxinga (鄭成功), whose 17th-century invasion marked the beginning of Chinese rule.
“You should not just talk and apologize to Aborigines — you should also focus on making mainstream society tune in and engage in soul-searching,” she said.
She added that Tsai should also have chosen to immediately recognize members of historic Pingpu (平埔) Aboriginal communities, which have been largely assimilated after centuries of pressure from neighboring Chinese settlers.
RSS