National Security Bureau (NSB) Director Tsai Der-sheng (蔡得勝) yesterday said that his bureau does not support government agencies using China’s Huawei Technologies Co’s (華為) products and said the company should be barred from government bids.
Tsai made the remarks during a meeting of the legislature’s Foreign Affairs and National Defense Committee in the morning.
Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Tsai Huang-liang (蔡煌瑯) asked Tsai Der-sheng whether government agencies, including the Presidential Office and the Ministry of Justice’s Investigation Bureau, had used Huawei’s network cards in their work cellphones.
Photo: CNA
He said that the government should be more alert to the possibility that confidential information could “very easily” be obtained by China via Huawei products.
Saying that Huawei is linked to the People’s Liberation Army, Tsai Huang-liang said that the government should ban the company from participating in public bids.
If the government itself is the biggest buyers of Huawei products, how could the government restrict private companies from buying Huawei products for national security concerns, he added.
“This is our policy now. The NSB has banned using Huawei’s products and thinks other government bureaus should not use the company’s products,” the NSB official added.
Tsai Huang-liang cited government statistics showing that the Investigation Bureau bought 124 sets of Huawei network cards, while the Presidential Office six sets and the Ministry of Transportation and Communications bought 20 Huawei cellphones.
The Mainland Affairs Council bought one set of Huawei’s network cards, but stopped using them after discovering they were produced by Huawei, he added.
The Investigation Bureau responded in a press statement that last year, it applied for a number of cellphone numbers from Chunghwa Telecom Co (中華電信) for agents’ internal communications, but Chunghwa offered network cards produced by Huawei with the numbers.
The Investigation Bureau added that those cellphones were closed-system cellphones used in inner network and could not be connected with the Internet or other networks.
The bureau is not concerned that confidential information could have been leaked by using those public phones, it added.
The Investigation Bureau said that it had no knowledge that the wireless network sticks it acquired from Chunghwa Telecom were manufactured by Huawei at the time of purchase.
“As the products have only been connected to the bureau’s closed internal network, there is no possibility that [confidential national security information] has been leaked,” the bureau said.
At a legislative session earlier yesterday, Tsai Huang-liang presented statistics regarding government agencies’ procurement of communication devices from Huawei in the past year.
The statistics showed that the Investigation Bureau had purchased 124 of Huawei’s E173 multi-mode wireless terminals, the largest number bought by any government agency.
‘NO SECURITY RISK’: The Railway Bureau reassured the public that the technicians’ activities were limited to technical guidance and did not involve sensitive systems The Railway Bureau yesterday said it had invited eight Chinese technicians to assist with an airport MRT construction project. The bureau issued the confirmation after an Internet user said Chinese nationals had entered the construction zone of Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport’s Terminal 3 project. They asked why “individuals from an enemy state” were allowed access to such a major national infrastructure project, which raised serious concerns over Taiwan’s industrial safety, sensitive systems and information security. The bureau’s Northern Region Engineering Branch Office said subcontractor Taiwan Handle Industrial Co (台灣手把工業) of the Taoyuan airport MRT’s “Contract No. CU05 Project A14 Station Civil, MEP &
A US uncrewed surface vessel (USV) encountered multiple Chinese warships during an autonomous transit of the Taiwan Strait, US defense company Seasats said in a statement on Wednesday. Seasats announced that a Lightfish USV had completed the first autonomous transit of the Taiwan Strait. Over five days, the USV traversed the entire length of the Strait while constantly monitoring surface vessel traffic, the company said. The Lightfish encountered multiple Chinese warships, one of which was a Chinese People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN) Type 056 corvette, it said. The Chinese vessels were operating “well within Taiwan’s exclusive economic zone without transmitting their identity via the
‘BOOMING’: ’ The number of partners we have here is incredible. You can see from their stock prices. They’re doing so well, they’re so happy,’ Jensen Huang said Nvidia Corp’s spending in Taiwan has ballooned to about US$150 billion a year, 10 times the US$10 billion to US$15 billion the company spent five years ago, Nvidia chief executive officer Jensen Huang (黃仁勳) said yesterday, suggesting Taiwan’s strategic importance in the global artificial intelligence (AI) supply chain. “Taiwan is the epicenter of the AI revolution. This is where the chips come, packaging comes. This is where the systems are made. This is where AI supercomputers were created,” Huang said at a meeting for the company’s employees in Beitou-Shilin Technology Park (北投士林科技園區) in Taipei, the planned site of Nvidia’s Taipei headquarters. “Taiwan
GREATER REACH? Auto parts and wood products would face tariffs of up to 15%, matching those targeting the EU, Japan and South Korea, Vice Premier said The US has announced that preferential tariff treatment for Taiwan’s non-semiconductor Section 232 goods would take effect retroactively from May 1, the Executive Yuan said yesterday. The US government yesterday posted a notice on the Federal Register’s public inspection Web site previewing tariff concessions for Taiwan under a memorandum of understanding (MOU) on Taiwan-US investment after two months of negotiations. The MOU signed on Jan. 15 stipulated three major preferential tariff arrangements: a 15 percent “reciprocal” tariff rate for Taiwan without stacking most-favored nation (MFN) rates; preferential Section 232 treatment for semiconductors and related products; and preferential Section 232 treatment for non-semiconductor