A draft act to allow Taiwan and China to establish representative offices in each other’s countries failed to pass its initial legislative committee review yesterday as opposition parties paralyzed the Internal Administration Committee meeting, while Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers also voiced dissatisfaction with the negotiations.
The establishment of representative offices in Taiwan and China will be addressed in the ninth round of cross-strait talks between the Straits Exchange Foundation (SEF) and Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Straits (ARATS) today in Shanghai. The foundation and ARATS will also sign a cross-strait service trade agreement during the negotiations.
The Internal Administration Committee was at 9am to begin review of legislation to allow Taiwan and China to create representative offices in each other’s countries. However, lawmakers from the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), Taiwan Solidarity Union and People First Party (PFP) arrived outside the meeting room at 7am, long before most KMT legislators arrived, at about 8:30am.
Photo: Lo Pei-der, Taipei Times
As soon as the room’s door was opened, opposition lawmakers rushed to occupy the podium to prevent the meeting from starting, and they succeeded in stalling the proceedings all day.
“A few days after a meeting between KMT Chairman Wu Po-hsiung (吳伯雄) and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) during which Wu and Xi agreed on the ‘one China’ principle and creating representative offices, the government is pushing through legislation for it,” DPP caucus whip Ker Chien-ming (柯建銘) said of the reason behind the caucus’ boycott. “However, the Mainland Affairs Council has yet to brief us on the ongoing talks about creating representative offices, so passing the legislation now would be like giving it a blank check.”
DPP Chairman Su Tseng-chang (蘇貞昌) also accused President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration of “asking the Legislative Yuan for a blank check” for the establishment of cross-strait representative offices before bilateral negotiations are completed.
It is essential for Taipei to have visitation rights to Taiwanese detained in China and the authorization to issue travel documents, but the administration demanded that the legislation be passed without the legislature knowing Beijing’s position on the matter, which was why the DPP would not accept the request before the negotiations are completed, Su said.
Meanwhile, the PFP issued a statement saying that while it supports enhancing cross-strait ties, “we do not agree with President Ma Ying-jeou’s handling of cross-strait talks, which has made cross-strait exchanges a business of his own and of his party.”
KMT caucus whip Lai Shyh-bao (賴士葆) condemned the boycott as “unreasonable” and “irrational,” but added at a separate setting that the KMT caucus was also dissatisfied that the council is unable to convince China to grant Taipei visitation rights to Taiwanese detained or jailed in China.
“There are at least 1,000 Taiwanese being detained or imprisoned in China. I think it’s entirely reasonable to ask China to allow officials from Taiwan’s representative office in China to visit them,” KMT Legislator Johnny Chiang (江啟臣) told a press conference at the KMT caucus office in the presence of Mainland Affairs Council Minister Wang Yu-chi (王郁琦).
“Without the right to humanitarian visits being included in the agreement, the KMT caucus will not support the draft bill either,” he said.
Wang did not give a firm, positive response.
“We will try our best to secure visitation rights, but I must say that the right to humanitarian visits is one thing for which Chinese negotiators have not shown any sign of agreeing to yet,” Wang said. “However, I fully understand the expectations from the government and from the KMT caucus.”
Ma says the establishment of representative offices for cross-strait exchanges is crucial and will serve more than 8 million people and facilitate NT$16 million (US$530,000) worth of trade.
“The two sides of the Taiwan Strait will deepen cross-strait exchanges, and it will be difficult to continue such exchanges without representative offices,” Ma said yesterday at the KMT headquarters.
Ma, who is also KMT chairman, pledged to enhance cross-strait exchanges if he is re-elected as the party’s chairman next month, while promising to promote regional peace in East Asia.
He declined to confirm whether he would visit China in his capacity as KMT chairman after completing his final term as president in 2016, and insisted that cross-strait development will continue to move forward.
“We have accomplished great achievements in cross-strait relations over the past five years and I believe the two sides of the Taiwan Strait cherish such fruitful results… Cross-strait exchanges will definitely continue to expand and deepen,” he said.
He said the government would conduct a thorough review of the Act Governing Relations Between the People of the Taiwan Area and the Mainland Area (台灣地區與大陸地區人民關係條例) to facilitate cross-strait exchanges.
Additional reporting by Mo Yan-chih and Chris Wang
LIMITS: While China increases military pressure on Taiwan and expands its use of cognitive warfare, it is unwilling to target tech supply chains, the report said US and Taiwan military officials have warned that the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) could implement a blockade within “a matter of hours” and need only “minimal conversion time” prior to an attack on Taiwan, a report released on Tuesday by the US Senate’s China Economic and Security Review Commission said. “While there is no indication that China is planning an imminent attack, the United States and its allies and partners can no longer assume that a Taiwan contingency is a distant possibility for which they would have ample time to prepare,” it said. The commission made the comments in its annual
DETERMINATION: Beijing’s actions toward Tokyo have drawn international attention, but would likely bolster regional coordination and defense networks, the report said Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s administration is likely to prioritize security reforms and deterrence in the face of recent “hybrid” threats from China, the National Security Bureau (NSB) said. The bureau made the assessment in a written report to the Legislative Yuan ahead of an oral report and questions-and-answers session at the legislature’s Foreign Affairs and National Defense Committee tomorrow. The key points of Japan’s security reforms would be to reinforce security cooperation with the US, including enhancing defense deployment in the first island chain, pushing forward the integrated command and operations of the Japan Self-Defense Forces and US Forces Japan, as
‘TROUBLEMAKER’: Most countries believe that it is China — rather than Taiwan — that is undermining regional peace and stability with its coercive tactics, the president said China should restrain itself and refrain from being a troublemaker that sabotages peace and stability in the Indo-Pacific region, President William Lai (賴清德) said yesterday. Lai made the remarks after China Coast Guard vessels sailed into disputed waters off the Senkaku Islands — known as the Diaoyutai Islands (釣魚台) in Taiwan — following a remark Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi made regarding Taiwan. Takaichi during a parliamentary session on Nov. 7 said that a “Taiwan contingency” involving a Chinese naval blockade could qualify as a “survival-threatening situation” for Japan, and trigger Tokyo’s deployment of its military for defense. Asked about the escalating tensions
The Ministry of Economic Affairs said it plans to revise the export control list for strategic high-tech products by adding 18 items under three categories — advanced 3D printing equipment, advanced semiconductor equipment and quantum computers — which would require local manufacturers to obtain licenses for their export. The ministry’s announcement yesterday came as the International Trade Administration issued a 60-day preview period for planned revisions to the Export Control List for Dual Use Items and Technology (軍商兩用貨品及技術出口管制清單) and the Common Military List (一般軍用貨品清單), which fall under regulations governing export destinations for strategic high-tech commodities and specific strategic high-tech commodities. The