Rights activists yesterday slammed police over their “show of concern” to farmers in Miaoli and Hsinchu Counties prior to a demonstration against land expropriation scheduled to take place in Taipei today, calling it a violation of people’s freedom of expression.
Members of self-help organizations in both Dapu Borough (大埔), Jhunan Township (竹南), Miaoli County and the Erchongpu (二重埔) community in Jhudong Township (竹東), Hsinchu County, told the Taipei Times yesterday that local police officers inquired whether members of the organizations would take part in a demonstration against forced land expropriation organized by residents of Leshan Village, (樂善) in Taoyuan County’s Gueishan Township (龜山), scheduled to be held in Taipei today, and asked them to report to local police stations if they plan to participate.
Dapu and Erchongpu are both farming villages facing land expropriations to make room for science park projects, while plots of land in Leshan Village are to be turned into an airport express train station, an industrial zone and social housing complexes.
“We’re not planning to take part, but even if we’re going to, it’s not our business to talk to police because we’re not the event organizer,” Dapu Self-Help Organization spokeswoman Yeh Hsiu-tao (葉秀桃) said. “This is not something that should happen in a democratic country.”
Yeh said that this was not the first time that police had interfered had with them. During the peak of their protest activities last year, she said, “the police kept an eye on the our organization’s leader almost 24 hours a day.”
Liu Ching-chang (劉慶昌), a member of the Erchongpu Self-Help Organization, and head of the Alliance for the Defense of Farming Villages, said that local police have also contacted her to “show their concern” about whether the organization would participate in the rally today.
“I think this is a violation of our rights. It’s our right to speak out for ourselves and to defend our properties,” Liu said. “Everything we’re doing is legal and they’re showing too much ‘concern’ for us.”
“But of course, we’re used to it already,” he added.
Taiwan Association for Human Rights secretary-general Tsai Chin-hsun (蔡季勳) said such an act by the police is “unacceptable in a democracy.”
“Monitoring the people before they even get on the street is very inappropriate, and is harassment,” Tsai said. “We have become used to such monitoring, but many other people would feel threatened and scared if they get phone calls from the police prior to taking part in demonstrations, and would then probably just decide not to do so.”
“If that happens, it’s repression of the freedom of expression,” she added.
On the other hand, a police officer in charge of maintaining order and security during demonstrations in Taipei, who wished to remain anonymous, told the Taipei Times that they would always ask for information on rallies from organizers because they needed to know what kind of situation they would face.
“For example, we would need to know how many people would be there, so we could plan traffic control measure,” the officer said. “We also need to know the necessary amount of manpower we have to deploy to keep demonstrations proceeding smoothly.”
However, the officer admitted that there are some police precincts overreacting to demonstrations, “and may do things that violate citizens’ legal rights to rallies and assemblies.”
CARROT AND STICK: While unrelenting in its military threats, China attracted nearly 40,000 Taiwanese to over 400 business events last year Nearly 40,000 Taiwanese last year joined industry events in China, such as conferences and trade fairs, supported by the Chinese government, a study showed yesterday, as Beijing ramps up a charm offensive toward Taipei alongside military pressure. China has long taken a carrot-and-stick approach to Taiwan, threatening it with the prospect of military action while reaching out to those it believes are amenable to Beijing’s point of view. Taiwanese security officials are wary of what they see as Beijing’s influence campaigns to sway public opinion after Taipei and Beijing gradually resumed travel links halted by the COVID-19 pandemic, but the scale of
TRADE: A mandatory declaration of origin for manufactured goods bound for the US is to take effect on May 7 to block China from exploiting Taiwan’s trade channels All products manufactured in Taiwan and exported to the US must include a signed declaration of origin starting on May 7, the Bureau of Foreign Trade announced yesterday. US President Donald Trump on April 2 imposed a 32 percent tariff on imports from Taiwan, but one week later announced a 90-day pause on its implementation. However, a universal 10 percent tariff was immediately applied to most imports from around the world. On April 12, the Trump administration further exempted computers, smartphones and semiconductors from the new tariffs. In response, President William Lai’s (賴清德) administration has introduced a series of countermeasures to support affected
Pope Francis is be laid to rest on Saturday after lying in state for three days in St Peter’s Basilica, where the faithful are expected to flock to pay their respects to history’s first Latin American pontiff. The cardinals met yesterday in the Vatican’s synod hall to chart the next steps before a conclave begins to choose Francis’ successor, as condolences poured in from around the world. According to current norms, the conclave must begin between May 5 and 10. The cardinals set the funeral for Saturday at 10am in St Peter’s Square, to be celebrated by the dean of the College
CROSS-STRAIT: The vast majority of Taiwanese support maintaining the ‘status quo,’ while concern is rising about Beijing’s influence operations More than eight out of 10 Taiwanese reject Beijing’s “one country, two systems” framework for cross-strait relations, according to a survey released by the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) on Thursday. The MAC’s latest quarterly survey found that 84.4 percent of respondents opposed Beijing’s “one country, two systems” formula for handling cross-strait relations — a figure consistent with past polling. Over the past three years, opposition to the framework has remained high, ranging from a low of 83.6 percent in April 2023 to a peak of 89.6 percent in April last year. In the most recent poll, 82.5 percent also rejected China’s