Taiwan can terminate the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement (ECFA) 180 days after notifying China should bilateral negotiations break down, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) said yesterday.
In a statement, the MAC said Article 1 of the ECFA states that if either party wishes to terminate the agreement, it must notify the other in writing.
Both contracting parties should then begin negotiations 30 days after a notification of termination is issued. The agreement will be terminated 180 days after the notification is issued should those negotiations fail, the statement said.
PHOTO: LIN CHENG-KUNG, TAIPEI TIMES
The statement said the spirit of the clause is that both sides would begin negotiations first before any party rushes into reckless action. The agreement can be unilaterally annulled at the request of either party 180 days after a notice is issued and bilateral negotiations have failed, without having to obtain the consent of the other party.
The statement said the term was one of the provisions the Taiwanese team fought hard to include in the accord.
“It is the ultimate safety net,” the statement said.
“It is improper to describe it as a bargaining chip that China will use to threaten Taiwan or to demand that it toe the line,” it added.
The statement was made in response to a Chinese-language Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister newspaper) report that warned Beijing could use the termination clause to demand that Taiwan behave.
Commenting on the termination clause yesterday, the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) spokesperson on ECFA related issues, Julian Kuo (郭正亮), said: “It doesn’t matter either way ... the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) government doesn’t have the courage to activate this exit clause anyway.”
He said DPP headquarters would, along with the DPP legislative caucus, look into a proposal to table a bill that would force the KMT government to invoke the exit clause of the agreement if it were not able to sign free-trade agreements (FTA) with other countries within a year.
DPP lawmakers would also consider attempting to force the government to terminate the agreement if GDP growth did not reach government estimates, unemployment continued to increase or if average salaries remained stagnant, Kuo added.
Commenting on the DPP caucus’ reported proposal, KMT Legislator Alex Tsai (蔡正元) said setting a timetable to sign FTAs with other countries would only place Taiwan in a disadvantageous position during negotiations.
KMT Legislator Lai Shyh-bao (賴士葆) said that while the DPP caucus has the right to table such a bill, activating the “termination clause” would only reverse the country’s development and restrict Taiwan from reaching out to the world.
“The DPP should ask businesses and farmers that will benefit from the ECFA if they agree that the ECFA and the FTA issue should be linked,” Lai said.
Legislative Speaker Wang Jyn-ping (王金平) said the proposal “did not make any sense” as it usually “takes about two years or more” for a country to complete negotiations on an FTA with a major trading partner.
Meanwhile, Wang said he would call a meeting this week so that lawmakers could decide the dates and the format of a provisional session to review the ECFA.
The DPP caucus has called for the ECFA to be screened “article by article.”
DPP spokesperson Lin Yu-chang (林右昌) said it was important that lawmakers carefully screened the ECFA before it became valid, based on public concerns that the controversial trade pact could impact Taiwan’s more fragile industries and the labor market because of competition from cheaper Chinese products.
“We are going to stand with the Taiwanese public and demand that the legislature conducts a thorough review of the ECFA,” Lin said.
The KMT caucus, however, is of the view that the legislature can only vote to accept or reject the agreement as a whole.
Noting the caucuses’ different stances on the issue, Wang said lawmakers needed to find a consensus on how to review the ECFA before deliberations begin because of the lack of a precedent in screening cross-strait agreements.
At a separate setting yesterday, Premier Wu Den-yih (吳敦義) said he would lead a group of officials that would defend the ECFA.
Wu was reluctant to put a figure on how much the trade deal would boost the economy, saying “much depends on the global economy and an individual country’s diligence.”
“The world is still feeling the aftermath of the global economic tsunami, but the ECFA helps to remove many obstacles, such as the unfair tariff terms, and therefore it increases Taiwan’s competitiveness,” Wu said.
Wu did not specify when he would appear at the legislature, but said he believed a second provisional session would be held in mid-to-late August.
At the same time, amendments to four laws — the Patent Act (專利法), the Customs Import Tariff Act (海關進口稅則), the Plant Variety and Plant Seed Act (植物品種及種苗法) and the Trademark Act (商標法) — will also be reviewed, with the goal of passing the amendments by the end of the year.
When asked if President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) would attend a question-and-answer session at the legislature as has been rumored, Wu answered with a categorical “no,” saying the law of the land does not require the president to appear in front of the legislature.
The paramount chief of a volcanic island in Vanuatu yesterday said that he was “very impressed” by a UN court’s declaration that countries must tackle climate change. Vanuatu spearheaded the legal case at the International Court of Justice in The Hague, Netherlands, which on Wednesday ruled that countries have a duty to protect against the threat of a warming planet. “I’m very impressed,” George Bumseng, the top chief of the Pacific archipelago’s island of Ambrym, told reporters in the capital, Port Vila. “We have been waiting for this decision for a long time because we have been victims of this climate change for
MASSIVE LOSS: If the next recall votes also fail, it would signal that the administration of President William Lai would continue to face strong resistance within the legislature The results of recall votes yesterday dealt a blow to the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) efforts to overturn the opposition-controlled legislature, as all 24 Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers survived the recall bids. Backed by President William Lai’s (賴清德) DPP, civic groups led the recall drive, seeking to remove 31 out of 39 KMT lawmakers from the 113-seat legislature, in which the KMT and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) together hold a majority with 62 seats, while the DPP holds 51 seats. The scale of the recall elections was unprecedented, with another seven KMT lawmakers facing similar votes on Aug. 23. For a
Taiwan must invest in artificial intelligence (AI) and robotics to keep abreast of the next technological leap toward automation, Vice President Hsiao Bi-khim (蕭美琴) said at the luanch ceremony of Taiwan AI and Robots Alliance yesterday. The world is on the cusp of a new industrial revolution centered on AI and robotics, which would likely lead to a thorough transformation of human society, she told an event marking the establishment of a national AI and robotics alliance in Taipei. The arrival of the next industrial revolution could be a matter of years, she said. The pace of automation in the global economy can
All 24 lawmakers of the main opposition Chinese Nationalists Party (KMT) on Saturday survived historical nationwide recall elections, ensuring that the KMT along with Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) lawmakers will maintain opposition control of the legislature. Recall votes against all 24 KMT lawmakers as well as Hsinchu Mayor Ann Kao (高虹安) and KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崐萁) failed to pass, according to Central Election Commission (CEC) figures. In only six of the 24 recall votes did the ballots cast in favor of the recall even meet the threshold of 25 percent of eligible voters needed for the recall to pass,
RSS