US President Barack Obama told top lawmakers on Tuesday not to politicize his deliberations on whether to send thousands more troops to Afghanistan, but failed to quell raging debate on the unpopular war.
Obama’s meeting with Democratic and Republican power brokers did little to bridge flagrant party divisions over Afghan strategy and reflected the lonely nature of what will be the most fateful decision of his presidency so far.
The White House talks came as Obama plunges deeper into an exhaustive, weeks-long review of Afghan policy, against a backdrop of rising troop deaths, a quickening Taliban insurgency and public anxiety over the course of the war.
“Given the importance of the policy to our security — and to our troops — the president said that he will be rigorous and deliberate, while moving forward with a sense of urgency,” a senior Obama administration official said.
Obama also warned lawmakers not to misrepresent the options — as Republicans demand swift action on troop deployments and some Democrats campaign openly against escalating the war.
“The president reiterated that we need this debate to be honest and dispense with the straw man argument that this is about either doubling down or leaving Afghanistan,” the official said.
The meeting with lawmakers took place on the eve of the eighth anniversary of former US president George W. Bush’s 2001 announcement of the start of air strikes in Afghanistan, following the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks.
Yesterday, Obama was to hold the latest meeting of his war council, including Vice President Joe Biden, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Secretary of Defense Robert Gates in the secure White House Situation Room.
Obama must decide whether to meet a request by the military for up to 40,000 more soldiers for a conflict that his commander on the ground, US General Stanley McChrystal, has warned could be lost within a year without more men.
Many Democrats oppose adding to the 68,000 US troops who will be in Afghanistan by the end of the year, fearing a long, unpopular war will turn into a quagmire or drain Obama’s hopes for a reforming presidency.
Republicans want Obama to act fast to send more soldiers, warning failure to do so would endanger US security and invite military defeat.
As debate flares over war strategy within and between the administration and the military, the president warned his eventual decision would not please everyone in Washington, or in the country, the official said.
High-profile leaders who emerged from the White House talks all praised Obama for inviting them — but their comments revealed deep divides over the war pervading Washington.
Republican Senator John McCain warned against one option Obama is thought to be considering — a focused counterterrorism campaign against al-Qaeda, rather than a full-scale counterinsurgency approach favored by McChrystal.
“The fact is, we all know if the Taliban comes back, al-Qaeda will come back,” McCain said, drawing parallels between Afghanistan and the under-resourced US effort in Iraq blamed for fanning the insurgency.
“I am very convinced that General McChrystal’s analysis is not only correct but should be implemented as quickly as possible,” he said.
Democratic Senate Majority leader Harry Reid sought to argue that all the meeting’s participants were on the same page.
“Everyone, Democrats and Republicans, said ‘whatever decision you make we’ll support it basically,’” Reid said.
But Republican Senate leader Mitch McConnell said his party would make up its mind only when the new strategy was clear.
And Eric Cantor, a top Republican in the House of Representatives, said Republicans would only back Obama if he dispatched more troops.
“We were here to express our support for the president and his committing to the mission up front, and expressed our support to work with him if he makes the right decision,” Cantor told CNN.
Democratic House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who earlier warned of grave reservations in her party about escalating the war, also declined to give an undertaking to support Obama’s decision.
“There was agreement that it’s a difficult decision for the president to make,” she told reporters outside the White House. “Whether we agreed with it or vote for it remains to be seen, when we see what the president puts forth.”
NO-LIMITS PARTNERSHIP: ‘The bottom line’ is that if the US were to have a conflict with China or Russia it would likely open up a second front with the other, a US senator said Beijing and Moscow could cooperate in a conflict over Taiwan, the top US intelligence chief told the US Senate this week. “We see China and Russia, for the first time, exercising together in relation to Taiwan and recognizing that this is a place where China definitely wants Russia to be working with them, and we see no reason why they wouldn’t,” US Director of National Intelligence Avril Haines told a US Senate Committee on Armed Services hearing on Thursday. US Senator Mike Rounds asked Haines about such a potential scenario. He also asked US Defense Intelligence Agency Director Lieutenant General Jeffrey Kruse
INSPIRING: Taiwan has been a model in the Asia-Pacific region with its democratic transition, free and fair elections and open society, the vice president-elect said Taiwan can play a leadership role in the Asia-Pacific region, vice president-elect Hsiao Bi-khim (蕭美琴) told a forum in Taipei yesterday, highlighting the nation’s resilience in the face of geopolitical challenges. “Not only can Taiwan help, but Taiwan can lead ... not only can Taiwan play a leadership role, but Taiwan’s leadership is important to the world,” Hsiao told the annual forum hosted by the Center for Asia-Pacific Resilience and Innovation think tank. Hsiao thanked Taiwan’s international friends for their long-term support, citing the example of US President Joe Biden last month signing into law a bill to provide aid to Taiwan,
China’s intrusive and territorial claims in the Indo-Pacific region are “illegal, coercive, aggressive and deceptive,” new US Indo-Pacific Commander Admiral Samuel Paparo said on Friday, adding that he would continue working with allies and partners to keep the area free and open. Paparo made the remarks at a change-of-command ceremony at Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam in Hawaii, where he took over the command from Admiral John Aquilino. “Our world faces a complex problem set in the troubling actions of the People’s Republic of China [PRC] and its rapid buildup of forces. We must be ready to answer the PRC’s increasingly intrusive and
STATE OF THE NATION: The legislature should invite the president to deliver an address every year, the TPP said, adding that Lai should also have to answer legislators’ questions The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) yesterday proposed inviting president-elect William Lai (賴清德) to make a historic first state of the nation address at the legislature following his inauguration on May 20. Lai is expected to face many domestic and international challenges, and should clarify his intended policies with the public’s representatives, KMT caucus secretary-general Hung Meng-kai (洪孟楷) said when making the proposal at a meeting of the legislature’s Procedure Committee. The committee voted to add the item to the agenda for Friday, along with another similar proposal put forward by the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP). The invitation is in line with Article 15-2