President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) challenged the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) yesterday to produce concrete evidence that he has jeopardized Taiwan’s sovereignty and urged them to be practical and flexible.
“I would like to ask the DPP where it wants to take the country in cross-strait relations,” he said. “If they want to go back to the eight years before we came to power, it is impossible ... It is clear what would happen. You cannot accomplish anything nor can you go anywhere.”
Ma said his cross-strait policy has gained local and international recognition and he didn’t think he had made any mistakes.
PHOTO: CHIEN JUNG-FONG, TAIPEI TIMES
“If sovereignty was lost, I can get it back,” he said. “But nobody can tell me exactly what was lost.”
Ma made the remarks during a news conference to mark the first anniversary of his inauguration on May 20 last year.
Ma said he welcomed the opposition’s criticism, but said it must be rational and practical. He said there was room for improvement in his policies, but he hoped DPP Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) would agree to talk instead of insisting on a debate, because it would only benefit both parties if they could reach a consensus.
Ma said the Republic of China (ROC) Constitution is a “one China” Constitution, and before both sides of the Taiwan Strait could talk about unification or independence, he would suggest “mutual non-denial” of each other’s existence.
Although critics complained that school textbooks are vague about Taiwan’s sovereignty, Ma said it should be made clear to the public that the sovereignty of the ROC belongs to the people.
“Taiwan is the ROC,” he said. “We should clear this up from a historical and constitutional viewpoint. The public must not be confused into thinking Taiwan’s sovereignty is undefined. We should never let anyone distort history for political reasons.”
Ma said the nine agreements and a joint statement his administration signed with Beijing are conductive to Taiwan’s development and none have hurt Taiwan or echoed China’s political overtures.
His administration’s definition of cross-strait relations was not new, he said, because former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) introduced the idea that Taiwan and China are two regions under the framework of the ROC Constitution and former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) did not alter that stance.
“I would like to ask the opposition if they would have agreed to participate in the World Health Assembly [WHA] meeting this year under the same circumstances if they were in power,” he said. “I would like to know whether it would be rational to reject or even withdraw from the event simply because the WHA did not call us Taiwan.”
Saying the answer to his questions were clear, Ma urged the public to cherish the opportunity to participate in the WHA. His government would like to participate under the name ROC or Taiwan, but it was not feasible at the moment.
“The former DPP administration tried but failed. During the process, they also sabotaged the country’s relationship with its allies,” he said.
Taiwan had joined the WTO in 2002 under the name “Chinese Taipei” and if the DPP didn’t like the name it should have opposed it in 2002, Ma said.
“We are practical and flexible. That is how we win the respect and sympathy of the international community,” he said. “Aggression leads to nothing and earns us the name of troublemaker.”
Ma said he called Department of Health Minister Yeh Ching-chuan (葉金川) on Monday to give him his support.
Ma said he could “fully understand” Yeh’s anger because he was a person who loved Taiwan, but had been accused of selling out.
Two Taiwanese students heckled Yeh in Geneva, where he is attending the WHA.
DPP Spokesman Cheng Wen-tsang (鄭文燦) told the Taipei Times that the DPP regrets that the president does not understand that he has hurt the country.
Ma’s acceptance of the “one China” principle, which the DPP has always rejected, violates Taiwan’s sovereignty, Cheng said.
Comments by Ma aimed at pleasing China had also jeopardized Taiwan’s sovereignty, Cheng said, citing Ma’s acceptance of the so-called “1992 consensus” — under which there is one China, with each side having its own interpretation — before first round of cross-strait talks.
He also cited Ma’s saying that relations between Taiwan and China were not country to country, but region to region before the second round of talks and his remarks in support of Chinese President Hu Jintao’s (胡錦濤) Dec. 31 speech to mark the 30th anniversary of Beijing’s “open letter to Taiwanese compatriots.”
Hu said both sides could only have exchanges under the “one China” principle.
Even Taiwan’s attendance at the WHA came at a cost, Cheng said, because the WHO Web site refers to Taiwan as “China (Province of Taiwan),” which is another affront to national sovereignty.
The DPP spokesman said the party hoped Ma would respond to issues raised by the DPP’s rally on Sunday before discussing a meeting with Tsai.
“The most serious problem with Ma and his government is that they do not care about the country’s sovereignty and status, and so they could not feel the public’s anger at the rally,” Cheng said.
Ma wants to talk with Tsai now to show that he listened to the complaints raised on Sunday, but Tsai wants a public debate with Ma on significant national policies, not a meeting that would have the effect of endorsing his failed policies, Cheng said.
Meanwhile, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus vowed yesterday to help advance the administration’s policies.
KMT caucus deputy secretary-general Yang Chiung-ying (楊瓊瓔) said KMT lawmakers believed the government needed to do more to show what it is doing for Taiwan during the global economic downturn even though Ma’s approval ratings have been climbing.
ADDITIONAL REPORTING BY RICH CHANG AND FLORA WANG
Taiwan is projected to lose a working-age population of about 6.67 million people in two waves of retirement in the coming years, as the nation confronts accelerating demographic decline and a shortage of younger workers to take their place, the Ministry of the Interior said. Taiwan experienced its largest baby boom between 1958 and 1966, when the population grew by 3.78 million, followed by a second surge of 2.89 million between 1976 and 1982, ministry data showed. In 2023, the first of those baby boom generations — those born in the late 1950s and early 1960s — began to enter retirement, triggering
ECONOMIC BOOST: Should the more than 23 million people eligible for the NT$10,000 handouts spend them the same way as in 2023, GDP could rise 0.5 percent, an official said Universal cash handouts of NT$10,000 (US$330) are to be disbursed late next month at the earliest — including to permanent residents and foreign residents married to Taiwanese — pending legislative approval, the Ministry of Finance said yesterday. The Executive Yuan yesterday approved the Special Act for Strengthening Economic, Social and National Security Resilience in Response to International Circumstances (因應國際情勢強化經濟社會及民生國安韌性特別條例). The NT$550 billion special budget includes NT$236 billion for the cash handouts, plus an additional NT$20 billion set aside as reserve funds, expected to be used to support industries. Handouts might begin one month after the bill is promulgated and would be completed within
NO CHANGE: The TRA makes clear that the US does not consider the status of Taiwan to have been determined by WWII-era documents, a former AIT deputy director said The American Institute in Taiwan’s (AIT) comments that World War-II era documents do not determine Taiwan’s political status accurately conveyed the US’ stance, the US Department of State said. An AIT spokesperson on Saturday said that a Chinese official mischaracterized World War II-era documents as stating that Taiwan was ceded to the China. The remarks from the US’ de facto embassy in Taiwan drew criticism from the Ma Ying-jeou Foundation, whose director said the comments put Taiwan in danger. The Chinese-language United Daily News yesterday reported that a US State Department spokesperson confirmed the AIT’s position. They added that the US would continue to
IMPORTANT BACKER: China seeks to expel US influence from the Indo-Pacific region and supplant Washington as the global leader, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng said China is preparing for war to seize Taiwan, Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) said in Washington on Friday, warning that Taiwan’s fall would trigger a regional “domino effect” endangering US security. In a speech titled “Maintaining the Peaceful and Stable Status Quo Across the Taiwan Strait is in Line with the Shared Interests of Taiwan and the United States,” Chiu said Taiwan’s strategic importance is “closely tied” to US interests. Geopolitically, Taiwan sits in a “core position” in the first island chain — an arc stretching from Japan, through Taiwan and the Philippines, to Borneo, which is shared by