Print

Mail

wiki links

US study discovers carcinogens in kids’ bath products

Dozens of popular children’s bath products marketed in the US contain two cancer-causing chemicals, a consumer safety watchdog group said in a report published on Friday.

The Campaign for Safe Cosmetics commissioned an independent laboratory to test 48 top-selling children’s products for 1,4-dioxane and 28 of them for formaldehyde.

Used for embalming corpses and, in the US, as glue in chipboard, formaldehyde is a by-product of a preservative added to the products to prevent bacteria growth and extend their shelf-life. The 1,4-dioxane chemical is used as a foaming agents in some products.

Twenty-three of the 28 products tested for formaldehyde were shown to contain the chemical and 17 of these contained both formaldehyde and 1,4-dioxane.

Among those were the highly popular Johnson’s Baby Shampoo, L’Oreal Kids Extra Gentle two-in-one shampoo and Pampers Kandoo foaming hand soap, which contained enough formaldehyde to trigger a skin reaction in highly sensitive people, the Campaign for Safe Cosmetics said in its report.

The US National Cancer Institute said studies of workers exposed to formaldehyde have linked the chemical to cancers of the nasal sinuses, nasopharynx, brain and possibly leukemia.

Thirty-two of the 48 products tested contained 1,4-dioxane.

The US Consumer Product Safety Commission has said that even trace amounts of 1,4-dioxane give “cause for concern,” while the Environmental Protection Agency and Department of Health and Human Services have both identified dioxane as causing cancer in animals and as a “probable human carcinogen.”

“If chemicals are causing cancer in animals, we really shouldn’t be putting them on babies’ heads,” said Stacy Malkan of the Campaign for Safe Cosmetics. The Personal Care Products Council dismissed the study’s finding as “patently false” and accused the Campaign for Safe Cosmetics of “preying upon parental worries.”

“The levels of the two chemicals the group reportedly found are considered to be ‘trace’ or extremely low ... well below established regulatory limits ... and are not a cause for health concern,” the US trade association for the cosmetic and personal care products industry said.

“When present, these chemicals would likely be found at very low levels precisely because companies have gone to great lengths in the formulation and manufacturing processes to ensure that the products are safe and gentle for children and also protected from harmful bacterial growth,” the organization said.

Malkan said the study gave cause for concern because “children are more vulnerable to the toxic effects of chemicals.”

The two chemicals are “completely unregulated” in the US, while 1,4-dioxane is banned in Europe and formaldehyde is restricted, she said.

“I don’t think parents need to be alarmed, but I feel outraged because there’s no need for these products to contain carcinogens,” she said.

Wang Jet-chau (王哲超), a spokesperson for the Department of Health said yesterday that the department had contacted importers of the products and was seeking to determine whether the products have entered local market.

ADDITIONAL REPORTING BY JIMMY CHUANG
This story has been viewed 1209 times.