The Council of Grand Justices yesterday announced Constitutional Interpretation No. 654 and said that Detention Act (羈押法) regulations that require meetings between a detained defendant and a lawyer to be supervised are unconstitutional. The interpretation also says that information gained from the recordings of such a meetings shall no longer be admissible as evidence after May 1.
The issue of lawyer-client confidentiality for detained suspects has been the subject of much controversy following the recent detention of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) on charges of money laundering and embezzlement, with the regulations attracting criticism from home and abroad.
On Jan. 8, New York University professor and Asian law expert Jerome Cohen criticized the measures in a piece in the South China Morning Post. Yesterday’s ruling came in response to a request from Mai An-huai (麥安懷), the former chief of staff of Taipei County Government Commissioner Chou Hsi-wei (周錫瑋), who was previously detained on suspicion of corruption.
Mai felt that the supervision and recording of his meetings with his lawyer were an infringement of his right to a defense. He requested a constitutional interpretation of articles 23 and 28 of the Detention Act. Both articles were ruled unconstitutional by the Council of Grand Justices.
Article 23 says: “A person who applies to grant a visitation with a defendant, shall state clearly their full name, occupation, age, residential address, the main content of the interview, the name of the defendant and the relationship with the defendant. Officials at the detention house shall supervise the visitation when it is granted.”
The interpretation says that paragraph 3 of Article 23, which allows the supervision and recording of meetings between a detainee and a lawyer regardless of the circumstances, and Article 28 were unconstitutional.
Article 28 says: “If the content of the speeches, conduct and sent and received mail of a defendant can provide information for the criminal investigation and trial, they shall be reported to the public prosecutor or the district court.”
In the interpretation, the Council of Grand Justices said that Article 23, Paragraph 3 and Article 28 would no longer be valid after May 1.
Judicial Yuan Secretary-General Hsieh Wen-ting (謝文定) said the interpretation protected the public’s litigation rights and did not conflict with efforts to maintain order and security in detention centers.
Hsieh said the current modus operandi is only to supervise and record meetings between lawyers and detainees who are being held incommunicado.
MISINFORMATION: The generated content tends to adopt China’s official stance, such as ‘Taiwan is currently governed by the Chinese central government,’ the NSB said Five China-developed artificial intelligence (AI) language models exhibit cybersecurity risks and content biases, an inspection conducted by the National Security Bureau (NSB) showed. The five AI tools are: DeepSeek, Doubao (豆包), Yiyan (文心一言), Tongyi (通義千問) and Yuanbao (騰訊元寶), the bureau said, advising people to remain vigilant to protect personal data privacy and corporate business secrets. The NSB said it, in accordance with the National Intelligence Services Act (國家情報工作法), has reviewed international cybersecurity reports and intelligence, and coordinated with the Ministry of Justice Investigation Bureau and the National Police Agency’s Criminal Investigation Bureau to conduct an inspection of China-made AI language
BOOST IN CONFIDENCE: The sale sends a clear message of support for Taiwan and dispels rumors that US President Donald Trump ‘sold out’ the nation, an expert said The US government on Thursday announced a possible sale to Taiwan of fighter jet parts, which was estimated to cost about US$330 million, in a move that an expert said “sends a clear message of support for Taiwan” amid fears that Washington might be wavering in its attitude toward Taipei. It was the first announcement of an arms sale to Taiwan since US President Donald Trump returned to the White House earlier this year. The proposed package includes non-standard components, spare and repair parts, consumables and accessories, as well repair and return support for the F-16, C-130 and Indigenous Defense Fighter aircraft,
CHECKING BOUNDARIES: China wants to disrupt solidarity among democracies and test their red lines, but it is instead pushing nations to become more united, an expert said The US Department of State on Friday expressed deep concern over a Chinese public security agency’s investigation into Legislator Puma Shen (沈伯洋) for “secession.” “China’s actions threaten free speech and erode norms that have underpinned the cross-strait ‘status quo’ for decades,” a US Department of State spokesperson said. The Chongqing Municipal Public Security Bureau late last month listed Shen as “wanted” and launched an investigation into alleged “secession-related” criminal activities, including his founding of the Kuma Academy, a civil defense organization that prepares people for an invasion by China. The spokesperson said that the US was “deeply concerned” about the bureau investigating Shen
DISPUTE: A Chinese official prompted a formal protest from Tokyo by saying that ‘the dirty head that sticks itself out must be cut off,’ after Takaichi’s Taiwan remarks Four armed China Coast Guard vessels yesterday morning sailed through disputed waters controlled by Japan, amid a diplomatic spat following Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s comments on Taiwan. The four ships sailed around the Senkaku Islands — known as the Diaoyutai Islands (釣魚台) to Taiwan, and which Taiwan and China also claim — on Saturday before entering Japanese waters yesterday and left, the Japan Coast Guard said. The China Coast Guard said in a statement that it carried out a “rights enforcement patrol” through the waters and that it was a lawful operation. As of the end of last month,
RSS