Sun, Dec 24, 2006 - Page 1 News List

US court halves punitive damages for Exxon spill

RECORD PROFITS A US court has contentiously decided to slash the amount of money Exxon will have to pay in reparations for the devastating 1989 'Exxon Valdez' spill


A US appeals court on Friday cut the punitive damages to be paid for the 1989 Exxon Valdez oil tanker disaster to US$2.5 billion, saying the amount is more in line with legal precedent.

The ruling by the US Court of Appeals in San Francisco marked the latest turn in the long-running litigation against ExxonMobil Corp.

A jury had originally awarded US$5 billion to be paid in connection with the worst oil spill in US history. It was reduced to US$4 billion and then raised to US$4.5 billion following various appellate rulings.

The appeals court, in a two to one decision, said the reduced amount is more in line with a standard set by the US Supreme Court for punitive damages to be limited to a "single digit" multiple of compensatory damages.

"We do so because, in assessing the reprehensibility of Exxon's misconduct ... there are several mitigating facts," judges Mary Schroeder and Andrew Kleinfeld wrote.

"These include prompt action taken by Exxon both to clean up the oil and to compensate the plaintiffs for economic losses. These mollify, at least to some material degree, the reprehensibility in economic terms of Exxon's original misconduct," they added.

Judge James Browning dissented, saying the US$4.5 billion award should be maintained.

"Because I believe the punitive damages award in this case is not `grossly excessive,' I would affirm," he wrote.

"In reviewing the size of a punitive damages award, our sole duty is to ensure its imposition does not violate due process. Where an award lies within the bounds of due process, as this one does, we may not substitute a figure we consider more reasonable for one fairly awarded by a jury and properly reviewed by a district court," he added.

In 1994, an Alaska court had ordered the Texas-based firm to pay US$5 billion in damages to some 34,000 fishermen and others who worked in Alaska's Prince William Sound, after the Exxon tanker crashed into a reef, spilling 41 million liters of crude into the sound.

ExxonMobil had argued it should not be forced to pay hefty punitive damages because it had already spent billions of dollars to compensate for losses and fund cleanup efforts.

But the activist US Public Interest Research Group (PIRG) called the latest ruling "an early Christmas present" for the company.

"It's outrageous that ExxonMobil, the most profitable oil company in the world, is getting a break in penalties for the largest oil spill in history," PIRG spokesman Zack Brown said.

"Prince William Sound is still feeling the negative impacts of this tragedy nearly 18 years later, while ExxonMobil is bringing record profits," he said.

ExxonMobil, which posted a record profit of US$36 billion last year and has earned US$29 billion in the first three quarters this year, has maintained that the environment in Prince William Sound "is healthy, robust and thriving," based on scientific reviews.

The company said it was reviewing the latest ruling.

"The Valdez oil spill was a tragic accident that ExxonMobil deeply regrets," spokesman Dave Gardner said.

"The company took immediate responsibility for the spill, cleaned it up and voluntarily compensated those who claimed direct damages. This case is not about compensating people for damages. The plaintiffs have been compensated for damages and most were compensated within one year of the spill. This ruling is about whether punitive damages are warranted in this case," she said.

This story has been viewed 2920 times.

Comments will be moderated. Keep comments relevant to the article. Remarks containing abusive and obscene language, personal attacks of any kind or promotion will be removed and the user banned. Final decision will be at the discretion of the Taipei Times.

TOP top