A US appeals court on Friday cut the punitive damages to be paid for the 1989 Exxon Valdez oil tanker disaster to US$2.5 billion, saying the amount is more in line with legal precedent.
The ruling by the US Court of Appeals in San Francisco marked the latest turn in the long-running litigation against ExxonMobil Corp.
A jury had originally awarded US$5 billion to be paid in connection with the worst oil spill in US history. It was reduced to US$4 billion and then raised to US$4.5 billion following various appellate rulings.
The appeals court, in a two to one decision, said the reduced amount is more in line with a standard set by the US Supreme Court for punitive damages to be limited to a "single digit" multiple of compensatory damages.
"We do so because, in assessing the reprehensibility of Exxon's misconduct ... there are several mitigating facts," judges Mary Schroeder and Andrew Kleinfeld wrote.
"These include prompt action taken by Exxon both to clean up the oil and to compensate the plaintiffs for economic losses. These mollify, at least to some material degree, the reprehensibility in economic terms of Exxon's original misconduct," they added.
Judge James Browning dissented, saying the US$4.5 billion award should be maintained.
"Because I believe the punitive damages award in this case is not `grossly excessive,' I would affirm," he wrote.
"In reviewing the size of a punitive damages award, our sole duty is to ensure its imposition does not violate due process. Where an award lies within the bounds of due process, as this one does, we may not substitute a figure we consider more reasonable for one fairly awarded by a jury and properly reviewed by a district court," he added.
In 1994, an Alaska court had ordered the Texas-based firm to pay US$5 billion in damages to some 34,000 fishermen and others who worked in Alaska's Prince William Sound, after the Exxon tanker crashed into a reef, spilling 41 million liters of crude into the sound.
ExxonMobil had argued it should not be forced to pay hefty punitive damages because it had already spent billions of dollars to compensate for losses and fund cleanup efforts.
But the activist US Public Interest Research Group (PIRG) called the latest ruling "an early Christmas present" for the company.
"It's outrageous that ExxonMobil, the most profitable oil company in the world, is getting a break in penalties for the largest oil spill in history," PIRG spokesman Zack Brown said.
"Prince William Sound is still feeling the negative impacts of this tragedy nearly 18 years later, while ExxonMobil is bringing record profits," he said.
ExxonMobil, which posted a record profit of US$36 billion last year and has earned US$29 billion in the first three quarters this year, has maintained that the environment in Prince William Sound "is healthy, robust and thriving," based on scientific reviews.
The company said it was reviewing the latest ruling.
"The Valdez oil spill was a tragic accident that ExxonMobil deeply regrets," spokesman Dave Gardner said.
"The company took immediate responsibility for the spill, cleaned it up and voluntarily compensated those who claimed direct damages. This case is not about compensating people for damages. The plaintiffs have been compensated for damages and most were compensated within one year of the spill. This ruling is about whether punitive damages are warranted in this case," she said.
MORE VISITORS: The Tourism Administration said that it is seeing positive prospects in its efforts to expand the tourism market in North America and Europe Taiwan has been ranked as the cheapest place in the world to travel to this year, based on a list recommended by NerdWallet. The San Francisco-based personal finance company said that Taiwan topped the list of 16 nations it chose for budget travelers because US tourists do not need visas and travelers can easily have a good meal for less than US$10. A bus ride in Taipei costs just under US$0.50, while subway rides start at US$0.60, the firm said, adding that public transportation in Taiwan is easy to navigate. The firm also called Taiwan a “food lover’s paradise,” citing inexpensive breakfast stalls
TRADE: A mandatory declaration of origin for manufactured goods bound for the US is to take effect on May 7 to block China from exploiting Taiwan’s trade channels All products manufactured in Taiwan and exported to the US must include a signed declaration of origin starting on May 7, the Bureau of Foreign Trade announced yesterday. US President Donald Trump on April 2 imposed a 32 percent tariff on imports from Taiwan, but one week later announced a 90-day pause on its implementation. However, a universal 10 percent tariff was immediately applied to most imports from around the world. On April 12, the Trump administration further exempted computers, smartphones and semiconductors from the new tariffs. In response, President William Lai’s (賴清德) administration has introduced a series of countermeasures to support affected
CROSS-STRAIT: The vast majority of Taiwanese support maintaining the ‘status quo,’ while concern is rising about Beijing’s influence operations More than eight out of 10 Taiwanese reject Beijing’s “one country, two systems” framework for cross-strait relations, according to a survey released by the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) on Thursday. The MAC’s latest quarterly survey found that 84.4 percent of respondents opposed Beijing’s “one country, two systems” formula for handling cross-strait relations — a figure consistent with past polling. Over the past three years, opposition to the framework has remained high, ranging from a low of 83.6 percent in April 2023 to a peak of 89.6 percent in April last year. In the most recent poll, 82.5 percent also rejected China’s
PLUGGING HOLES: The amendments would bring the legislation in line with systems found in other countries such as Japan and the US, Legislator Chen Kuan-ting said Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Chen Kuan-ting (陳冠廷) has proposed amending national security legislation amid a spate of espionage cases. Potential gaps in security vetting procedures for personnel with access to sensitive information prompted him to propose the amendments, which would introduce changes to Article 14 of the Classified National Security Information Protection Act (國家機密保護法), Chen said yesterday. The proposal, which aims to enhance interagency vetting procedures and reduce the risk of classified information leaks, would establish a comprehensive security clearance system in Taiwan, he said. The amendment would require character and loyalty checks for civil servants and intelligence personnel prior to