Mon, Mar 31, 2003 page1

• Al-Jazeera says it won't censor the horrors of war

  • REUTERS
  • • 
    • 
    • 

  Blasted by Washington and London for beaming distressing pictures from Iraq, al-Jazeera television said yesterday it would not censor the horrors of war.

  "I think the audience has the right to see all aspects of the battle," said Jihad Ballout, spokesman for the Qatar-based al-Jazeera, seen by many as being a major influence in shaping Arab opinion over the US-led war.

  The 24-hour, Arabic-language, broadcaster deliberated carefully before beaming pictures that could be especially troublesome to viewers, he said, and denied any political bias.

  "We're not catering for any specific side, or any specific ideology. What we are doing is our business as professionally as possible," Ballout added.

  Images of bombed Baghdad buildings, bloodied and screaming Iraqi children and slain or captured US and British troops seen by millions of viewers angered Washington and London which seek to portray the war as one to liberate Iraqis.

  "If there's a perceived imbalance, it's purely a function of access," Ballout said.

  He said if the Americans and British gave the station more access to their troops, who invaded Iraq 12 days ago "you would certainly find as much coverage on the ground from there as you would find from the Iraqi side."

  The station says it has at least 35 million viewers in the Arab world. In Europe, Ballout said, its subscriber figures doubled to 8 million homes in the first week of the war. These came mainly in countries with large Muslim populations such as Britain and France.

  The Pentagon initially offered al-Jazeera several opportunities to travel with US combat units but only one of these "embed" offers worked out, he said.

  The others fell through because of visa headaches from Bahrain, a base for allied warships, and Kuwait, launchpad for many journalists covering US and British ground forces.

  With many ordinary Arabs protesting angrily at the US-led war to oust Iraqi President Saddam Hussein, authorities in some Arab states also object to al-Jazeera's conflict coverage.

  The station has also drawn US ire for its cover in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, its broadcast messages from al-Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden and, more recently, for showing video footage of Iraqi interrogation of US prisoners of war.

  "They tend to portray our efforts in a negative light," US Secretary of State Colin Powell said in an interview with National Public Radio broadcast last Wednesday.

  The same day, Powell appeared on al-Jazeera, as have other Bush administration officials to get their messages to Arab viewers.

  Britain's military commander in the Gulf, Air Marshal Brian Burridge even suggested the station might have become a tool of Iraqi propaganda and violated the Geneva Conventions. In fact, the 1949 protocols bind states, not media organizations.

  Burridge slammed al-Jazeera for showing "shocking, close-up" pictures of two British troops later said by Prime Minister Tony Blair to have been executed by Iraqis, a claim which was denied by the soldiers' family members based on information from other members of their unit.

  "Quite apart from the obvious distress that such pictures cause friends and families of the personnel concerned, such disgraceful behavior is a flagrant breach of the Geneva Convention," Burridge told a briefing at US Central Command's forward headquarters in Qatar last Thursday.

  But Ballout, a 45-year-old former London-based journalist of Lebanese descent, dismisses such criticism as hypocritical and self-serving. He said other 24-hour news channels like the BBC and CNN had also used footage of Iraqi POWs, hands bounds and heads bowed, that could have upset viewers.

  "We have covered similar incidents, similar conflicts, in Serbia, in Bosnia, in the [Israeli-] occupied territories and in Afghanistan, and nobody said a thing," he said.

  "It just strikes me a little bit funny that all the outcry is taking place" now.

  Al-Jazeera is not however without its supporters in the US. The New York Times said in an editorial yesterday that "if our hope for the Arab world is, as the Bush administration never ceases to remind us, for it to enjoy a free, democratic life, al-Jazeera is the kind of television station we should encourage."
• Most Popular

  • 1

    Sixers down Rockets in overtime

  • 2

    Senegal stun Morocco to win AFCON

  • 3

    Chinese social media influencer’s residency revoked

  • 4

    Attack on military convoy in Yemen kills five people

  • 5

    Harris leads Pistons past Celtics in thriller