Here is perhaps something not to be proud of as a resident of Taiwan: according to Mazaska Talks, a to Web site run by indigenous US activists, four of the nation’s financial institutions are listed among “banks financing indigenous rights violations and the desecration of our earth.”
Despite being minor players, E Sun Commercial Bank, Bank of Taiwan, Taiwan Cooperative Bank and Hua Nan Commercial Bank have allegedly invested in several controversial pipeline projects in the US, including the Dakota Access, which sparked major indigenous resistance as it would threaten sacred grounds and affect the quality of water in the area. Construction has also brought an influx of male workers that have led to a surge in violent crime, especially against women.
“We are here today to let you know that the power is in the people’s hands, and to wake up is to know where your money is going … [and] who’s actually using your money to invest. Most people don’t know, and some people in the banks don’t even know,” indigenous US filmmaker and activist Myron Dewey tells the audience in Taipei after a screening of his film Awake about the Standing Rock protests.
Photo courtesy of Chad Yen
Exhausted after spending the previous day meeting with officials at the Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi, a primary target for divesting in the pipeline projects, Dewey and fellow indigenous activist Patrick Kincaid, who is a lawyer, arrived in Taiwan on Monday for a two-week tour where they will screen the film, share their experience in indigenous and grassroots activism, visit with Aboriginal groups and finally, attempt to plead their case with the Taiwanese banks.
Dewey and Kincaid refer to themselves as “water protectors,” which is what those opposing the pipeline prefer to be called instead of “protesters.”
Since they have not been able to stop the pipeline construction, the activists turned to divestment campaigns to curb its funding. Last February, Seattle became the first city to sever ties with its primary financial services provider of Wells Fargo, which is investing in the pipeline and the company building it.
Dewey and Kincaid have their unique ways of persuading people to join their cause.
“We’re all born of water from our mothers, and it’s important to recognize that even across the world, we’re connected by the water we drink. When we see the pipelines go through, we consider it raping our mother,” Dewey says.
As a lawyer, Kincaid invokes international indigenous rights accords and agreements that these banks and governments are violating.
“I’d like to see if we can stimulate a unification of citizens in Taiwan and the US to address our colonial governments’ approach to environmental and social issues associated with energy policy,” he says. “Indigenous and citizens both, we’re all in the same boat. We share the colonial banking structures that are promoting these international extraction industries that are destroying the world.”
For more information about their trip and a list of public talks and screenings, visit www.facebook.com/DKTaiwanTour2018.
May 6 to May 12 Those who follow the Chinese-language news may have noticed the usage of the term zhuge (豬哥, literally ‘pig brother,’ a male pig raised for breeding purposes) in reports concerning the ongoing #Metoo scandal in the entertainment industry. The term’s modern connotations can range from womanizer or lecher to sexual predator, but it once referred to an important rural trade. Until the 1970s, it was a common sight to see a breeder herding a single “zhuge” down a rustic path with a bamboo whip, often traveling large distances over rugged terrain to service local families. Not only
Ahead of incoming president William Lai’s (賴清德) inauguration on May 20 there appear to be signs that he is signaling to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and that the Chinese side is also signaling to the Taiwan side. This raises a lot of questions, including what is the CCP up to, who are they signaling to, what are they signaling, how with the various actors in Taiwan respond and where this could ultimately go. In the last column, published on May 2, we examined the curious case of Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) heavyweight Tseng Wen-tsan (鄭文燦) — currently vice premier
The last time Mrs Hsieh came to Cihu Park in Taoyuan was almost 50 years ago, on a school trip to the grave of Taiwan’s recently deceased dictator. Busloads of children were brought in to pay their respects to Chiang Kai-shek (蔣中正), known as Generalissimo, who had died at 87, after decades ruling Taiwan under brutal martial law. “There were a lot of buses, and there was a long queue,” Hsieh recalled. “It was a school rule. We had to bow, and then we went home.” Chiang’s body is still there, under guard in a mausoleum at the end of a path
Last week the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) released a set of very strange numbers on Taiwan’s wealth distribution. Duly quoted in the Taipei Times, the report said that “The Gini coefficient for Taiwanese households… was 0.606 at the end of 2021, lower than Australia’s 0.611, the UK’s 0.620, Japan’s 0.678, France’s 0.676 and Germany’s 0.727, the agency said in a report.” The Gini coefficient is a measure of relative inequality, usually of wealth or income, though it can be used to evaluate other forms of inequality. However, for most nations it is a number from .25 to .50