Last month, the New York Times reported that Chinese activist Li Dan (李丹) had “relocated” his 1905 Hong Kong Human Rights Film Festival to Taiwan, with a smaller satellite festival in its original location.
Looking at the schedule, however, perhaps Li has changed his mind. The festival will indeed take place concurrently in both locations, but there are still significantly more offerings in Hong Kong than in Taiwan.
“It’s more like an expansion, because we can’t give up on Hong Kong,” Li says, noting that Taiwan’s freedom of speech allows for more opportunities for funding and exchanges. The festival will continue in Hong Kong, he says, to maintain his original purpose of exposing people there and China to human rights issues.
Photo courtesy of 1905 Human Rights Film Festival
In collaboration with the Formosa Festival of International Filmmakers (福爾摩沙國際電影節) and the Taiwan International Queer Film Festival (台灣國際酷兒影展), the renamed 1905 Human Rights Film Festival kicks off its Taiwan program on Saturday with 15 feature and documentary productions, shown mostly at smaller venues such as coffee shops, bookstores and universities.
ACTIVISM
Li has long been on the frontlines of Chinese activism, starting from his involvement in HIV prevention in 2003, for which he won the Reebok Human Rights Award in 2006 for non-violent activists under 30 years. In recent years, he’s turned his focus toward cultural activities, such as opening a bookstore in Hong Kong and establishing the China Women’s Film Festival.
Photo courtesy of 1905 Human
“You might think that you’ve made a significant difference as an activist fighting directly against the government. But when you count the number of people involved in human rights in China, both back then and today, there’s just a few thousand at most. For real change, we need strong civic participation. How do we get the public involved?” Li says.
Li says that although the festival pushes the envelope, it’s difficult to shut down a film festival. However, there’s no way that a human rights program would be allowed in China. And with Beijing tightening its control over Hong Kong, Li felt that opportunities for growth would be limited.
“It’s not to the point in Hong Kong where we can’t talk about anything, but it’s tough as far as seeking resources,” he says.
Photo courtesy of 1905 Human Rights Film Festival
SELF-CENSORSHIP
Li says he could seek funding from foreign embassies in China, but their Hong Kong counterparts have a much smaller budget for such activities. Hong Kong corporations that want to stay on China’s good side will avoid the festival due to its association with human rights, which greatly reduces the number of potential investors.
Even filmmakers are reluctant to participate or help out in fear of repercussions by the Chinese government, Li says.
Photo courtesy of 1905 Human Rights Film Festival
“People often think that we’re spies [coming from China],” he adds. “They think it’s strange that we’re able to put together such a film festival in Hong Kong without the government interfering. But we know how to find the cracks in the steel plate where we can operate.”
Li says the key is to keep a low profile, to remain outside of the “top 10.”
“Also, insist that you’re not doing anything new. When they question me, I just tell them, hey, Hong Kong already has the [Hong Kong Human Rights Documentary Film Festival],” he says.
Photo courtesy of 1905 Human Rights Film Festival
The main goal in establishing a presence in Taiwan, in addition to resources, is to establish a platform where filmmakers from the region and beyond can freely interact and exchange ideas.
“Taiwan already has a lot of film festivals, we don’t need to join in on the fun,” Li says. “We are looking for a long-term base where we can have workshops, collaborations, discussions, seminars, bring international filmmakers here and Taiwanese overseas.”
May 6 to May 12 Those who follow the Chinese-language news may have noticed the usage of the term zhuge (豬哥, literally ‘pig brother,’ a male pig raised for breeding purposes) in reports concerning the ongoing #Metoo scandal in the entertainment industry. The term’s modern connotations can range from womanizer or lecher to sexual predator, but it once referred to an important rural trade. Until the 1970s, it was a common sight to see a breeder herding a single “zhuge” down a rustic path with a bamboo whip, often traveling large distances over rugged terrain to service local families. Not only
Ahead of incoming president William Lai’s (賴清德) inauguration on May 20 there appear to be signs that he is signaling to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and that the Chinese side is also signaling to the Taiwan side. This raises a lot of questions, including what is the CCP up to, who are they signaling to, what are they signaling, how with the various actors in Taiwan respond and where this could ultimately go. In the last column, published on May 2, we examined the curious case of Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) heavyweight Tseng Wen-tsan (鄭文燦) — currently vice premier
The last time Mrs Hsieh came to Cihu Park in Taoyuan was almost 50 years ago, on a school trip to the grave of Taiwan’s recently deceased dictator. Busloads of children were brought in to pay their respects to Chiang Kai-shek (蔣中正), known as Generalissimo, who had died at 87, after decades ruling Taiwan under brutal martial law. “There were a lot of buses, and there was a long queue,” Hsieh recalled. “It was a school rule. We had to bow, and then we went home.” Chiang’s body is still there, under guard in a mausoleum at the end of a path
Last week the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) released a set of very strange numbers on Taiwan’s wealth distribution. Duly quoted in the Taipei Times, the report said that “The Gini coefficient for Taiwanese households… was 0.606 at the end of 2021, lower than Australia’s 0.611, the UK’s 0.620, Japan’s 0.678, France’s 0.676 and Germany’s 0.727, the agency said in a report.” The Gini coefficient is a measure of relative inequality, usually of wealth or income, though it can be used to evaluate other forms of inequality. However, for most nations it is a number from .25 to .50