Last month, the New York Times reported that Chinese activist Li Dan (李丹) had “relocated” his 1905 Hong Kong Human Rights Film Festival to Taiwan, with a smaller satellite festival in its original location.
Looking at the schedule, however, perhaps Li has changed his mind. The festival will indeed take place concurrently in both locations, but there are still significantly more offerings in Hong Kong than in Taiwan.
“It’s more like an expansion, because we can’t give up on Hong Kong,” Li says, noting that Taiwan’s freedom of speech allows for more opportunities for funding and exchanges. The festival will continue in Hong Kong, he says, to maintain his original purpose of exposing people there and China to human rights issues.
Photo courtesy of 1905 Human Rights Film Festival
In collaboration with the Formosa Festival of International Filmmakers (福爾摩沙國際電影節) and the Taiwan International Queer Film Festival (台灣國際酷兒影展), the renamed 1905 Human Rights Film Festival kicks off its Taiwan program on Saturday with 15 feature and documentary productions, shown mostly at smaller venues such as coffee shops, bookstores and universities.
ACTIVISM
Li has long been on the frontlines of Chinese activism, starting from his involvement in HIV prevention in 2003, for which he won the Reebok Human Rights Award in 2006 for non-violent activists under 30 years. In recent years, he’s turned his focus toward cultural activities, such as opening a bookstore in Hong Kong and establishing the China Women’s Film Festival.
Photo courtesy of 1905 Human
“You might think that you’ve made a significant difference as an activist fighting directly against the government. But when you count the number of people involved in human rights in China, both back then and today, there’s just a few thousand at most. For real change, we need strong civic participation. How do we get the public involved?” Li says.
Li says that although the festival pushes the envelope, it’s difficult to shut down a film festival. However, there’s no way that a human rights program would be allowed in China. And with Beijing tightening its control over Hong Kong, Li felt that opportunities for growth would be limited.
“It’s not to the point in Hong Kong where we can’t talk about anything, but it’s tough as far as seeking resources,” he says.
Photo courtesy of 1905 Human Rights Film Festival
SELF-CENSORSHIP
Li says he could seek funding from foreign embassies in China, but their Hong Kong counterparts have a much smaller budget for such activities. Hong Kong corporations that want to stay on China’s good side will avoid the festival due to its association with human rights, which greatly reduces the number of potential investors.
Even filmmakers are reluctant to participate or help out in fear of repercussions by the Chinese government, Li says.
Photo courtesy of 1905 Human Rights Film Festival
“People often think that we’re spies [coming from China],” he adds. “They think it’s strange that we’re able to put together such a film festival in Hong Kong without the government interfering. But we know how to find the cracks in the steel plate where we can operate.”
Li says the key is to keep a low profile, to remain outside of the “top 10.”
“Also, insist that you’re not doing anything new. When they question me, I just tell them, hey, Hong Kong already has the [Hong Kong Human Rights Documentary Film Festival],” he says.
Photo courtesy of 1905 Human Rights Film Festival
The main goal in establishing a presence in Taiwan, in addition to resources, is to establish a platform where filmmakers from the region and beyond can freely interact and exchange ideas.
“Taiwan already has a lot of film festivals, we don’t need to join in on the fun,” Li says. “We are looking for a long-term base where we can have workshops, collaborations, discussions, seminars, bring international filmmakers here and Taiwanese overseas.”
This year will go down in the history books. Taiwan faces enormous turmoil and uncertainty in the coming months. Which political parties are in a good position to handle big changes? All of the main parties are beset with challenges. Taking stock, this column examined the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) (“Huang Kuo-chang’s choking the life out of the TPP,” May 28, page 12), the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) (“Challenges amid choppy waters for the DPP,” June 14, page 12) and the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) (“KMT struggles to seize opportunities as ‘interesting times’ loom,” June 20, page 11). Times like these can
June 23 to June 29 After capturing the walled city of Hsinchu on June 22, 1895, the Japanese hoped to quickly push south and seize control of Taiwan’s entire west coast — but their advance was stalled for more than a month. Not only did local Hakka fighters continue to cause them headaches, resistance forces even attempted to retake the city three times. “We had planned to occupy Anping (Tainan) and Takao (Kaohsiung) as soon as possible, but ever since we took Hsinchu, nearby bandits proclaiming to be ‘righteous people’ (義民) have been destroying train tracks and electrical cables, and gathering in villages
Dr. Y. Tony Yang, Associate Dean of Health Policy and Population Science at George Washington University, argued last week in a piece for the Taipei Times about former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) leading a student delegation to the People’s Republic of China (PRC) that, “The real question is not whether Ma’s visit helps or hurts Taiwan — it is why Taiwan lacks a sophisticated, multi-track approach to one of the most complex geopolitical relationships in the world” (“Ma’s Visit, DPP’s Blind Spot,” June 18, page 8). Yang contends that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has a blind spot: “By treating any
One of the biggest sore spots in Taiwan’s historical friendship with the US came in 1979 when US president Jimmy Carter broke off formal diplomatic relations with Taiwan’s Republic of China (ROC) government so that the US could establish relations with the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Taiwan’s derecognition came purely at China’s insistence, and the US took the deal. Retired American diplomat John Tkacik, who for almost decade surrounding that schism, from 1974 to 1982, worked in embassies in Taipei and Beijing and at the Taiwan Desk in Washington DC, recently argued in the Taipei Times that “President Carter’s derecognition
RSS