A wardrobe staple, the T-shirt is being celebrated in a London exhibition as a master communication tool used to carry subversive and campaigning messages to the world. “T-Shirt: Cult — Culture — Subversion” opened yesterday and runs to May 6 at London’s Fashion and Textile Museum, where more than 100 T-shirts trace the impact it has had on popular culture and society in recent decades.
“Since its earliest incarnation at the start of the 20th century, the T-shirt has served as a means to broadcast social, musical and political passions,” the museum declared.
The humble T-shirt was introduced to the US Navy kit list in 1913, as a short-sleave white cotton undervest, but the term “T-shirt” didn’t make it to the Merriam-Webster Dictionary until 1920.
Photo: AFP
Gaining popularity through the decades, it hit the Hollywood big time in 1951 by clinging to the chest of actor Marlon Brandon in A Streetcar Named Desire.
But the T-shirt has also been harnessed for political and social campaigns, on everything from the environment to gay rights, as a simple tool able to be reproduced on a mass scale.
“It’s the kind of most democratic form of clothing, but also with the use of silkscreen you can reproduce messages over and over,” said Dennis Nothdruft, head of exhibitions at the museum.
‘GOD SAVE THE QUEEN’
Punk fashion priestess Vivenne Westwood harnessed the T-shirt in 1977, printing an image created by artist Jamie Reid with “God Save The Queen” scrawled across a portrait of the British monarch.
“The Queen is a sacred object in England, so just to do that was such a shock to the system,” Nothdruft said.
Westwood has continued to use T-shirts in her collections and catwalk shows, in 2012 printing her own portrait with “I am Julian Assange” written on it in reference to the WikiLeaks founder. An image of cartoon Mickey Mouse in front of the cloud of an atom bomb was used in 1976 as a critique of US policies by artists John Dove and Molly White. The T-shirt was deemed “anti-American” by Disney, which according to the exhibition forced the designers to stop selling it.
Other artists who have printed their views onto T-shirts include Keith Haring, the celebrated American street artist, who created the Ignorance = Fear, Silence = Death image in 1990. It was designed for the organization Act Up, as part of a campaign against homophobia and a lack of knowledge about AIDS.
ANTI-BREXIT
The T-shirt shows no sign of falling out of fashion, with politically-charged messages such as artist Jeremy Deller’s approach last year to Britain’s departure from the European Union. He wrote “Don’t worry, fuck Brexit,” around a smiley face in matching yellow, combining with the blue background to match the colors of the EU flag. The exhibition also explores how the clothing is used by luxury brands such as Dior, which last year created a “We Should All Be Feminists” T-shirt using the title of a book by Nigerian author Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie.
Another exhibit — “No More Page Three” — brought the protest against topless models in The Sun tabloid to the heart of Britain’s political establishment. MP Caroline Lucas wore the T-shirt to parliament in 2013, only to be told her clothing was not in line with regulations, according to the exhibition.
She held up an image of one of the page three models, and replied: “It strikes me as an irony that this T-shirt is seen as offensive.”
May 6 to May 12 Those who follow the Chinese-language news may have noticed the usage of the term zhuge (豬哥, literally ‘pig brother,’ a male pig raised for breeding purposes) in reports concerning the ongoing #Metoo scandal in the entertainment industry. The term’s modern connotations can range from womanizer or lecher to sexual predator, but it once referred to an important rural trade. Until the 1970s, it was a common sight to see a breeder herding a single “zhuge” down a rustic path with a bamboo whip, often traveling large distances over rugged terrain to service local families. Not only
Ahead of incoming president William Lai’s (賴清德) inauguration on May 20 there appear to be signs that he is signaling to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and that the Chinese side is also signaling to the Taiwan side. This raises a lot of questions, including what is the CCP up to, who are they signaling to, what are they signaling, how with the various actors in Taiwan respond and where this could ultimately go. In the last column, published on May 2, we examined the curious case of Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) heavyweight Tseng Wen-tsan (鄭文燦) — currently vice premier
The last time Mrs Hsieh came to Cihu Park in Taoyuan was almost 50 years ago, on a school trip to the grave of Taiwan’s recently deceased dictator. Busloads of children were brought in to pay their respects to Chiang Kai-shek (蔣中正), known as Generalissimo, who had died at 87, after decades ruling Taiwan under brutal martial law. “There were a lot of buses, and there was a long queue,” Hsieh recalled. “It was a school rule. We had to bow, and then we went home.” Chiang’s body is still there, under guard in a mausoleum at the end of a path
Last week the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) released a set of very strange numbers on Taiwan’s wealth distribution. Duly quoted in the Taipei Times, the report said that “The Gini coefficient for Taiwanese households… was 0.606 at the end of 2021, lower than Australia’s 0.611, the UK’s 0.620, Japan’s 0.678, France’s 0.676 and Germany’s 0.727, the agency said in a report.” The Gini coefficient is a measure of relative inequality, usually of wealth or income, though it can be used to evaluate other forms of inequality. However, for most nations it is a number from .25 to .50