The Time Between Two Mistakes at the National Theater last weekend was a bizarre, chaotic mess: a head-on collision between theater and dance, storytelling and ... I’m not sure what the hell they were going on about. However, it was delivered with total and tireless commitment by each performer.
It is a show that challenges audiences’ preconceptions about art and performance, and whether you love it, hate it or fall somewhere in-between, it is a show that is hard to get out of your head.
That is usually a good thing. Theater, as with any art form, can be pretty and light and an enjoyable escape, but it is often best when it forces viewers to confront their expectations.
Photo courtesy of Chou Jia-hui
Anyone who took the Taipei MRT to see the show were given fair warning of the Brussels-based Needcompany’s take-no-prisoners approach. The massive wall poster that greeted people entering or leaving the Chiang Kai-shek Memorial Hall Station exit closest to the theater, had the show title’s in huge Chinese characters and smaller English letters, and immediately underneath the phrase: “If Art Is My Lover Then Who The F… Are You?”
Conceived by Needcompany cofounders Jan Lauwers and Grace Ellen Barkey (who was also one of the performers) as a meditation on or response to British director Peter Brooks’ The Empty Space, each production has had a cast that is half local performers, who bring their own training and perspectives, meaning that the show seen in Taipei last weekend was different than the previous incarnations at the Steirischer Herbst Festival in Austria in 2014 and then in Berlin.
The idea is that each cast has to create its own home on the stage. Just like any home, sometimes it was neat and clean, other times it was a disaster zone.
Photo courtesy of Chou Jia-hui
The audience is greeted by a bare, fully exposed stage as they take their seats, the half-raised orchestra pit home to a piano, drum kit, guitar, videocamera and props.
A cacophony of sound erupts from the back of the theater and the cast, attired in a colorful variety of T-shirts, shorts and swimwear bounce down the steps on the left aisle and onto the stage, shouting lyrics like a squad of pumped-up military recruits and proceed to weave back and forth around the stage several times before departing.
In the silence that follows, Maarten Seghers, in a white sequined and satin master of ceremonies outfit, explains the starting point of the show — Brooks’ book — as a translation of his comments is projected onto the back of the stage, and then proceeds to explain where Brooks went wrong, hence the two mistakes in the show’s title.
What follows is a series of vignettes, with no particular rhyme or reason and very little connecting them except a full-on assault on the eyes — and often the ears — of the watchers. Some are fun, while others are in need of editing.
A swirl of bright hoop-clad dancers bob and weave around the stage as others push a variety of props and lighting and sound equipment. It looks like fun — and then it devolves into a bacchanalia of sexual couplings or individual onanism, sometimes with props, as a large white clown figure wanders around asking questions and growing increasingly distressed.
If this part is supposed to demonstrate the questions of what is right or wrong or good, it is hard to tell. What is does demonstrate is that the segment needs to be cut by several minutes.
Other segments are more successful, including the video recordings, both live and recorded that a projected above the heads of the performers.
The cast come together to build a house of cards out of white sparkly flats and other props and have a house-warming party at the same time, but there are fights and furtitive kisses — captured by the camera — while some sing about “here and now we do the best we can.”
However, no sooner is everything lined up then a rough-looking tent structure appears from the right of the stage and proceeds to devour everything and everyone as it moves across the floor, while a black-and-white projection above the action gives a Blair Witch Project feel to the proceedings. When the tent comes to a stop, clothing begins to spew from the hole in the roof.
As the tent retreats from where it came, it leaves the detritus of the party behind, along with a row of bodies, stripped down to black briefs and bras. Four men appear and begin to move the still jerking bodies to front and center of the stage, carefully piling them one on top of the other, while the video above shows decapitated fish heads at a market stall, one quite animatedly flopping about in a pool of red.
It made me think of how German film director Rainer Werner Fassbinder always seemed to incorporate a butcher’s shop or abettoir in his films so he could compare his human subjects to meat.
The show climaxes with a group dance, with time for individual solos and then the cast retreats to the far, far back of the stage, circling the large white clown figure on a revolving platform, as they make individual runs to the front to shout a word or slogan or just give a thumbs-up as the audience hears the refrain that “all things are good.”
To that, I would have to add: sometimes.
In late October of 1873 the government of Japan decided against sending a military expedition to Korea to force that nation to open trade relations. Across the government supporters of the expedition resigned immediately. The spectacle of revolt by disaffected samurai began to loom over Japanese politics. In January of 1874 disaffected samurai attacked a senior minister in Tokyo. A month later, a group of pro-Korea expedition and anti-foreign elements from Saga prefecture in Kyushu revolted, driven in part by high food prices stemming from poor harvests. Their leader, according to Edward Drea’s classic Japan’s Imperial Army, was a samurai
The following three paragraphs are just some of what the local Chinese-language press is reporting on breathlessly and following every twist and turn with the eagerness of a soap opera fan. For many English-language readers, it probably comes across as incomprehensibly opaque, so bear with me briefly dear reader: To the surprise of many, former pop singer and Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) ex-lawmaker Yu Tien (余天) of the Taiwan Normal Country Promotion Association (TNCPA) at the last minute dropped out of the running for committee chair of the DPP’s New Taipei City chapter, paving the way for DPP legislator Su
It’s hard to know where to begin with Mark Tovell’s Taiwan: Roads Above the Clouds. Having published a travelogue myself, as well as having contributed to several guidebooks, at first glance Tovell’s book appears to inhabit a middle ground — the kind of hard-to-sell nowheresville publishers detest. Leaf through the pages and you’ll find them suffuse with the purple prose best associated with travel literature: “When the sun is low on a warm, clear morning, and with the heat already rising, we stand at the riverside bike path leading south from Sanxia’s old cobble streets.” Hardly the stuff of your
Located down a sideroad in old Wanhua District (萬華區), Waley Art (水谷藝術) has an established reputation for curating some of the more provocative indie art exhibitions in Taipei. And this month is no exception. Beyond the innocuous facade of a shophouse, the full three stories of the gallery space (including the basement) have been taken over by photographs, installation videos and abstract images courtesy of two creatives who hail from the opposite ends of the earth, Taiwan’s Hsu Yi-ting (許懿婷) and Germany’s Benjamin Janzen. “In 2019, I had an art residency in Europe,” Hsu says. “I met Benjamin in the lobby