The heirs of Alfred Flechtheim, a German-Jewish art dealer and collector, sued the German state of Bavaria on Monday, arguing in court papers that it has refused to turn over works of art that the heirs say were looted by the Nazis before World War II.
The suit, filed in federal court in New York, seeks the return of eight paintings by the artists Max Beckmann, Juan Gris and Paul Klee from the Bavarian state paintings collection. The Flechtheim heirs said seven years of negotiations had failed, and in court papers they accused Bavaria of not living up to international commitments on the restitution of art taken by the Nazis.
“Bavaria’s refusal to confront its responsibility has persisted since the war,” the complaint filed in US District Court in Manhattan states. Its “chain of title to the paintings is defective because it was rooted in the seizure of Flechtheim’s property in violation of international law.”
Photo: EPA/Justin Lane
In Weimar-era Germany, Flechtheim was a prominent art dealer, with galleries in Berlin and Dusseldorf, who supported avant-garde artists. He was also targeted by the Nazis as a Jew and a promoter of what they considered “degenerate” art. He fled Germany in May 1933, and died penniless in London four years later, at the age of 59.
According to the complaint, brought by the son and the widow of Flechtheim’s nephew — Michael Hulton, who lives in San Francisco, and Penny Hulton, a resident of Britain — the works being sought were among those Flechtheim was forced to leave behind as he was hounded out of Germany, and his galleries were taken over. They include six works by Beckmann, among them Portrait of Quappi in Blue, from 1926.
Bavaria has said previously that the paintings were not looted art. Officials there have said that the works were in fact sold by Flechtheim about 1932, before the Nazis came to power.
They were later donated to the Bavarian state paintings collection in 1974 by a Munich dealer, Gunther Franke.
But Flechtheim’s heirs dispute the Bavarian government’s position, citing, among other things, evidence that they say shows that the paintings were still in Flechtheim’s possession in 1934, after Hitler came to power. They say there is evidence that one of Flechtheim’s paintings was acquired from him in 1934 by Hildebrand Gurlitt, one of four dealers allowed under the Nazis to buy and sell the modern, or “degenerate,” art they officially so despised.
The collection of 19th and 20th-century European masterworks amassed by Gurlitt caused a sensation when it was revealed in 2013 after being kept hidden for decades by his son, Cornelius, in his Munich apartment.
In addition, the Flechtheim heirs say that Flechtheim ended up calling off a planned 1932 sale of many of his paintings to another dealer — which could have been one way they landed in Franke’s hands.
“Flechtheim did not sell the paintings to Franke, who usurped the collection for himself as a direct, proximate and foreseeable consequence of Flechtheim’s racial persecution by the Nazi state,” a lawyer for the Flechtheim heirs, Nicholas O’Donnell, wrote in the filing.
A lawyer for the Bavarian government, Andreas Frischknecht, declined to comment on the filing.
Artworks associated with Flechtheim have been the subject of other litigation in the past: The heirs of the expressionist artist George Grosz, a celebrated painter who fled Nazi Germany in 1933, sued the Museum of Modern Art for the return of two important oil paintings and a watercolor he had left behind in Berlin.
The Grosz heirs say that Flechtheim was only temporarily caring for the three Grosz works and that he was forced to sell or abandon his holdings because of the climate of terror created by Hitler’s regime.
The Flechtheim heirs criticize Bavaria for refusing to open records that they say would help research into the fate of the paintings.
Their filing cites a letter sent last year by 29 members of the US Congress to Horst Seehofer, governor of Bavaria, asking for “greater dialogue and cooperation to fulfill” international principles aimed at supporting the restitution of art seized by the Nazis.
In late October of 1873 the government of Japan decided against sending a military expedition to Korea to force that nation to open trade relations. Across the government supporters of the expedition resigned immediately. The spectacle of revolt by disaffected samurai began to loom over Japanese politics. In January of 1874 disaffected samurai attacked a senior minister in Tokyo. A month later, a group of pro-Korea expedition and anti-foreign elements from Saga prefecture in Kyushu revolted, driven in part by high food prices stemming from poor harvests. Their leader, according to Edward Drea’s classic Japan’s Imperial Army, was a samurai
The following three paragraphs are just some of what the local Chinese-language press is reporting on breathlessly and following every twist and turn with the eagerness of a soap opera fan. For many English-language readers, it probably comes across as incomprehensibly opaque, so bear with me briefly dear reader: To the surprise of many, former pop singer and Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) ex-lawmaker Yu Tien (余天) of the Taiwan Normal Country Promotion Association (TNCPA) at the last minute dropped out of the running for committee chair of the DPP’s New Taipei City chapter, paving the way for DPP legislator Su
It’s hard to know where to begin with Mark Tovell’s Taiwan: Roads Above the Clouds. Having published a travelogue myself, as well as having contributed to several guidebooks, at first glance Tovell’s book appears to inhabit a middle ground — the kind of hard-to-sell nowheresville publishers detest. Leaf through the pages and you’ll find them suffuse with the purple prose best associated with travel literature: “When the sun is low on a warm, clear morning, and with the heat already rising, we stand at the riverside bike path leading south from Sanxia’s old cobble streets.” Hardly the stuff of your
Located down a sideroad in old Wanhua District (萬華區), Waley Art (水谷藝術) has an established reputation for curating some of the more provocative indie art exhibitions in Taipei. And this month is no exception. Beyond the innocuous facade of a shophouse, the full three stories of the gallery space (including the basement) have been taken over by photographs, installation videos and abstract images courtesy of two creatives who hail from the opposite ends of the earth, Taiwan’s Hsu Yi-ting (許懿婷) and Germany’s Benjamin Janzen. “In 2019, I had an art residency in Europe,” Hsu says. “I met Benjamin in the lobby