When it was announced that Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) won the presidential election last month, supporters crowded her national campaign headquarters in celebration.
In addition to being elected Taiwan’s first female president, Tsai’s victory is especially significant for the country’s lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) community. Unlike other candidates and all former presidents, she will be the first Taiwanese president ever to publicly support same-sex marriage.
A NEW PRESIDENT
Photo courtesy of Tsai Ing-wen’s national campaign headquarters
Tsai’s LGBT-friendly position was summed up last month in a headline by news outlet Quartz: “Taiwan’s new president is a female academic who loves cats and supports gay rights.” Before the Taiwan LGBT Pride Parade in Taipei last year, she publicly declared support for marriage equality to boost parade’s visibility and momentum. With her popularity and influence, Tsai should make a positive impact on Taiwan’s gay rights movement.
It would be naive, however, to view Tsai’s victory as a panacea for the LGBT community. In light of the fact that DPP caucus whip Ker Chien-ming (柯建銘), as well as some DPP legislators, has repeatedly blocked a draft bill for marriage equality, it is hardly surprising that the Collective of Sex Workers and Supporters (日日春關懷互助協會) asked: “Does Tsai really speak for the DPP [on the issue]?”
Tsai has also been called “water spinach” ( 空心菜, kongxincai), a hollow-stemmed vegetable, for failing to propose substantial policy ideas (“Tsai” is homophonous with cai, 菜, vegetable). Though the transition of executive power doesn’t take place until May, she has yet to propose any concrete LGBT policies, so the gay community should not soley rely on her support.
photo: Su Ching-feng, Taipei Times
A NEW PARTY
The legislative election was held on the same day as the presidential election. The emergence of the Faith and Hope League (信心希望聯盟, FHL) party reveals how contentious marriage equality remains in Taiwan. Unlike other parties, the FHL ran on a conservative platform that specifically targeted LGBT rights.
The party was established in September of last year for the purpose of building a “Christian political platform.” But the eight legislative candidates it nominated failed to gain any seats, receiving 1.7 percent of the vote — a low figure, but suggests that there is still significance opposition to the idea.
During its campaign, the FHL pledged to protect “traditional family values” by pushing for a referendum against the legalization of same-sex marriage. With the help of Christian teachers, it controversially distributed petitions to elementary and secondary school students, who were told to have their parents sign the forms.
For example, the student bulletin of National Taichung Girls’ Senior High School (台中女中) reported last month that members of the FHL were distributing petitions at the school’s sports games, warning students not to be brainwashed by LGBT people.
“Taiwan is a free and democratic society, and Taiwanese enjoy the freedom of expression and the right to participate in politics through referenda,” the bulletin stated. “But it is outrageous when the right is misused to oppress others,” raising the question of who is being oppressed?
A NEW LEGISLATURE
In another sign that there is still much that needs to be done for LGBT rights, 12 legislators, including Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislator Lu Hsueh-chang (呂學樟), a former Judiciary Committee convener who said that homosexuals are “scary” and that legalizing same-sex marriage is encouraging “bestiality,” stood for the election. Although they failed to be nominated or reelected, they are still on the political scene.
However, today close to 40 of Taiwan’s 113 legislators support same-sex marriage — a new high. This means that the LGBT community may have a better chance to put the draft bill for marriage equality on the legislative agenda in the new legislature.
Despite continued opposition to gay rights, it is encouraging to see an LGBT-friendly president and legislature. With the victory in both the presidential and legislative elections, perhaps Taiwan’s LGBT community will finally achieve the same rights they have been denied for so long.
June 2 to June 8 Taiwan’s woodcutters believe that if they see even one speck of red in their cooked rice, no matter how small, an accident is going to happen. Peng Chin-tian (彭錦田) swears that this has proven to be true at every stop during his decades-long career in the logging industry. Along with mining, timber harvesting was once considered the most dangerous profession in Taiwan. Not only were mishaps common during all stages of processing, it was difficult to transport the injured to get medical treatment. Many died during the arduous journey. Peng recounts some of his accidents in
“Why does Taiwan identity decline?”a group of researchers lead by University of Nevada political scientist Austin Wang (王宏恩) asked in a recent paper. After all, it is not difficult to explain the rise in Taiwanese identity after the early 1990s. But no model predicted its decline during the 2016-2018 period, they say. After testing various alternative explanations, Wang et al argue that the fall-off in Taiwanese identity during that period is related to voter hedging based on the performance of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP). Since the DPP is perceived as the guardian of Taiwan identity, when it performs well,
The Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) on May 18 held a rally in Taichung to mark the anniversary of President William Lai’s (賴清德) inauguration on May 20. The title of the rally could be loosely translated to “May 18 recall fraudulent goods” (518退貨ㄌㄨㄚˋ！). Unlike in English, where the terms are the same, “recall” (退貨) in this context refers to product recalls due to damaged, defective or fraudulent merchandise, not the political recalls (罷免) currently dominating the headlines. I attended the rally to determine if the impression was correct that the TPP under party Chairman Huang Kuo-Chang (黃國昌) had little of a
At Computex 2025, Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang (黃仁勳) urged the government to subsidize AI. “All schools in Taiwan must integrate AI into their curricula,” he declared. A few months earlier, he said, “If I were a student today, I’d immediately start using tools like ChatGPT, Gemini Pro and Grok to learn, write and accelerate my thinking.” Huang sees the AI-bullet train leaving the station. And as one of its drivers, he’s worried about youth not getting on board — bad for their careers, and bad for his workforce. As a semiconductor supply-chain powerhouse and AI hub wannabe, Taiwan is seeing
RSS