Since Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) became Taipei mayor late last year, his administration has produced a regular stream of startlingly direct announcements. The latest was a harsh critique of creative and cultural industries, in which the commissioner of the Taipei Department of Urban Development, Lin Jou-min (林洲民), declared Huashan 1914 Creative Park, Songshan Creative Park and several others to be “fake cultural parks” in a Facebook post on Sunday.
“To you CEOs who have no intention of fostering real creative industries, please get back in your black sedans and get out of Taipei! As long as you are here, Taiwan’s artists will forever be second class citizens,” he wrote.
Lin is right. Taiwan set out to develop “cultural parks” in the late 1990s, and for the most part they have now turned into cultural shopping malls. Huashan now rents the front lawn for beverage advertisements and the exhibition spaces are mostly inhabited by plug-and-play events for candy manufacturers, exhibitions of Beatles memorabilia and, on a good weekend, perhaps a National Geographic photo exhibition. There is no artistic community and a very limited sense that local arts groups have any investment or meaningful participation in these cultural parks.
Photo: Dana Ter, Taipei Times
Money grab
To a large degree, the exhibitions and events are put on by a new breed of professional event and exhibition groups that formed over the last decade in order to gobble up the new government budgets created to promote “cultural and creative industries” — a government project which has now become a buzzword. The Honhai Group, one of Taiwan’s richest companies and the manufacturer of iPhones and other Apple products, invoked the banner of “cultural and creative industries” to build a new building between Huashan and the Guanghua Computer Market, the Sanchuang Digital Life Plaza (三創數位生活園區). By waving the culture flag, one of the richest companies in Taiwan got the land on which the building is constructed for free. When the plaza opens in the next few months, Taipei will see that it is nothing other than an upscale shopping mall.
One of the problems is the conception of cultural and creative industries. In the minds of government and industry, every venture is supposed to make money immediately and every event is supposed to result in direct sales. This mentality is essentially that of a nation that understands manufacturing but little else. There is no sense that creativity needs room and freedom to incubate and grow.
Photo: Dana Ter, Taipei Times
This is why Taiwan will continue to lag behind South Korea and Japan, and it is also falling behind China, when it comes to creating films, music and other salable cultural products. Taiwan’s films are mostly considered unwatchable by international audiences, despite the legacy of Hou Hsiao-hsien (侯孝賢) and Taiwan’s new wave cinema in the 1990s. The pop music industry is dying and has little idea on how to manufacture new stars. The ongoing decline of Taiwan’s actual money-making cultural industries is all the more reason to protect places where the arts can flourish.
Taiwan gained a reputation for indie culture in the 1990s and 2000s, including the indie music scene, auteur cinema, experimental theater groups and artist-run art galleries, as well as the loose agglomeration of coffee shops, live houses and other businesses where creative types liked to hang out. This could not be found in Singapore or Hong Kong, where rents were too expensive.
China lagged behind Taiwan in the 1990s due to a repressive government, but even with moderate liberalization in the last 15 years, it has surpassed Taiwan in contemporary art and indie music. Part of this comes on the strength of China’s massive population and huge market size. Another part of the reason is that artists had space to self-organize, as in Beijing’s 798 Arts District.
Photo: Dana Ter, Taipei Times
Beijing’s 798 arts district
798 started off very similar to Huashan. Both are factory spaces discovered and settled by artist squatters. 798 has now become highly professional and in many senses commercialized, even “touristy,” but it is still focused on contemporary art, and is home mainly to artist studios and commercial galleries. Huashan kicked out all the artists long ago, and many of them can no longer afford the rent. Though Huashan contains a music performance space (Legacy) and an independent cinema (Spot Huashan), it treats culture as a commodity to be sold, not as an atmosphere to be experienced.
Taiwan’s real challenge is how to harness the “cool energy” of all the indie kids running around throwing funky parties for a few dozen friends, and turn it into something bigger. Professionalism will be part of the equation, but right now there is a huge disconnect between the professionals, who merely swoop in to grab government contracts, and the creative types, who meander from one government grant to the next. Lin’s harsh critique is not the ultimate answer, but it seems a good start in refocusing priorities.
Photo: Dana Ter, Taipei Times
Drones are widely recognized as a critical weapons technology of the future. Because of this, the pro-China Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) appear to be obstructing their development. One approach to handling this obstruction is to circumvent it by building robust drone capabilities across a wide swathe of the population. Taiwan is doing just that, but more is needed. The Penghu County Government on Monday said it was testing flying drones on routes from Magong City (馬公), the county seat, to Jibei Island (吉貝嶼). Because all of the inhabited islands lie within 40km of Magong,
No matter where one sits on the political spectrum and who one blames for the ongoing struggles between the executive and legislative branches or the latest food scandal, there has been noticeable frustration with the way democratic institutions are functioning. Attempts to circumvent political opposition and institutional checks can begin a slide toward authoritarianism, even when presented as short-term solutions to gridlock. While that might solve problems in the short term, it inevitably evolves into a system that serves the rulers and the powerfully connected at the expense of the rights of regular folks. One interesting lens to examine the
Another doleful set of demographic announcements this month from the National Development Council (NDC), with the number of young people shriveling as the proportion of old people grows. “Taiwan’s 18-year-olds, the typical age for entering college, will fall below 200,000 for the first time in the 2027 academic year to 195,309, down from 200,406 in 2026,” this paper reported citing NDC sources. Meanwhile, the administration of President William Lai (賴清德) announced a goal of training at least 500,000 AI professionals by 2040. Although this could include foreign recruits and retraining those already in the workforce, the math is stark: Ministry of
Picture humanity in a boat being swept down a raging river, praying there is no Niagara Falls ahead. Or imagine standing with the pioneering physicists in 1942 before they triggered the first self-sustaining nuclear fission chain reaction beneath a Chicago stadium. These were two of the analogies used this week by Robert Trager, an expert in the nascent field of AI governance, to describe the perilous but potential-filled moment the world stands at with accelerating artificial intelligence. Trager, the director of the Oxford Martin AI Governance Initiative, was speaking in the week OpenAI claimed the technology had crossed the threshold known as
RSS