Lou Yi-an (樓一安) has had a recurring dream since childhood. In the dream, he stands alone on a stage. There is one word he needs to communicate, but he freezes. The audience laughs as he struggles to remember.
“It is a strange, vivid memory. I suddenly become aware of my own existence. What am I doing standing here? Why am I here at all?”
The dream becomes the opening scene of The Losers (廢物), the second feature film directed and written by Lou. In the film, the word he struggles to recall is “land.”
Photo courtesy of Lou Yi-an
Lou arrives to the interview wearing a T-shirt emblazoned with a McDonald’s logo with an upturned middle finger and “I’m fuckin’ it” written on it. When pushed for an answer on how he became interested in left-wing causes, he mentions Karl Marx, Lu Xun (魯迅) and Woodstock.
The filmmaker is frequently spotted at street protests; his films always center on the disadvantaged.
The Losers is no exception. Following Shiou, a failed actor, returning to his Greater Kaohsiung suburb hometown, Meinong (美濃), the film probes some of the difficult issues facing Taiwan’s farming villages. One involves what locals call “venomous dragon ponds” (毒龍潭) — sand and gravel companies buying up fertile land from elderly farmers, which they turn into gravel extraction sites while selling the soil for whopping profits. The companies then refill the farmland with medical waste and other scrap upon which houses are to be built later.
Such operations are a common occurrence in Taiwan’s countryside, and Meinong is one of the areas where the shady business is out of control, Lou says.
Lou and his crew were able to film one of these sites, but had to ask the local police to “guarantee” their safety.
“The sand and gravel business can, you know, spell danger,” the director says.
It is the kind of danger touched upon in a sequence in which Shiou stops by the extraction site, trying to take a photograph as a piece of evidence. A man looking like a hoodlum appears out of nowhere and chases him away.
RURAL PROBLEMS
Originally a project commissioned by Hakka Television Service, the film draws its inspiration from the defunct Hakka band Labor Exchange’s (交工樂隊) Night March of the Chrysanthemums (菊花夜行軍), an epic album telling of a young Hakka man returning to Meinong to become a flower farmer and raise a family with his Indonesian wife.
“I have this strange attachment to Meinong because of Lin Sheng-hsiang’s (林生祥) music. It inspired me to learn about this place … It just so happens that lots of things I am particularly concerned about are happening in Meinong,” Lou says.
For Lou, all the issues revolve around the idea of land, its value and people’s relation to it.
“When you enter the town, there are real-estate ads everywhere you see … Farmers are too old to farm, and their children are not coming back. The land is unused, waiting for the right price,” he adds.
While dealing with unsavory issues — land exploitation, drug abuse, rural poverty — Lou’s film doesn’t differentiate the good guys from the bad guys, or draw a clear line between right and wrong. Each of the characters is on their own, striving to find a place in the world.
“I don’t want my characters to make demands, take action or affect change, because that’s not what happens in real life. Most kids who live in rural areas don’t think, of or are incapable of, fighting for a cause … I don’t want to make a statement. I see problems, put them into my works for people to see,” Lou says.
SOCIAL AWARENESS
Lou and Singing Chen (陳芯宜), his long-term collaborator, are among the most socially conscious filmmakers of their generation. Together, the two have made several feature-length and short works including Chen’s God Man Dog (流浪神狗人), Lou’s debut feature A Place of One’s Own (一席之地, 2009) and his award-winning short Waterfront Villa Bonita (水岸麗景, 2007). Their oeuvres look at the vices and virtues of Taiwanese society through characters who are social misfits, dispossessed Aborigines and members of the deprived and the displaced.
However harsh the reality is that the filmmakers address, they always manage to reflect it with a dark sense of humor, making the unbearable absurd and comic. Chen prefers magical realism; Lou’s direction is more inclined towards realism.
“The more I have seen, the more I feel that it won’t work if you tell people: ‘fuck, let’s overthrow the government.’ They will be like: ‘oh crap, here comes the mob again.’ It is better when these things are implied,” Lou says.
However, with no big names in the cast, together with the heavy subject matter, The Losers is no crowd pleaser. Lou says he was advised not to have the film theatrically released.
The film is currently playing at Taipei’s Spot Huashan Cinema (光點華山電影館) for one week. It was the only theater willing to show it, and the run ends tomorrow.
However, Lou isn’t discouraged. He hopes that the film will have “a longer life” and to be shown through different venues and events such as college campus tours.
“I don’t particularly love films. I make films because I have something to say … The Losers is a story I really want to tell. It is important that it reaches as many people as possible.”
There was a time, a few decades ago, when the men who owned the world’s biggest pornography businesses were happy to be famous. They paraded a lifestyle they hoped looked glamorous, appearing in public dressed in silk pajamas or with a woman in swimwear on each arm. Porn moguls like Hustler’s Larry Flynt or Playboy’s Hugh Hefner were household names. “Say what you want about these old perverts, who once set the tone of our sexual culture, but at least you knew who they were and what they were selling,” Patricia Nilsson writes in her new book, Guilty Pleasure: The Pornification
Speculation started to fly last month that Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidates running in the November elections wanted to keep their distance from party Chair Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文). That some in the KMT were concerned that Cheng’s firm ideological adherence to the “one China principle” is no secret. There had already been pushback from within the party on issues ranging from the budget to defense, as well as over some of her more hardline comments. The timing made sense, however. The KMT party congress unity love fest wrapped up at the end of July. Through the primaries and up to
In 1904 the Japanese introduced caning to Taiwan. As a punishment, caning was applied by the Japanese to Taiwanese and Chinese subjects, never to the Japanese themselves (it had been outlawed in Japan in 1882). An imperial and colonial act, caning thus functioned to define and display social class boundaries. So it is with the new legislation permitting caning proposed by Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators last week. According to the KMT proposal, individuals committing major fraud, aggravated sexual assault, driving under the influence of drugs and child abuse may be subject to caning. These are high-profile offenses that generate great
OCT. 5 to OCT. 11 Many worshippers of Taoist deity Lord Su (蘇府王爺) had never witnessed his “north-south grand inspection tour” of central Taiwan. The historic procession last took place in 1969, and before that, in 1893. Lukang’s Fengtian Temple (奉天宮) in Changhua County last Sunday completed Lord Su’s sixth grand inspection tour ever, taking its three main statues to settlements from Miaoli to Yunlin over 10 days. According to news reports, this year’s event also included a boat patrol that set out from Taichung, bringing luck and safety to fishers and offshore wind farm workers. Why did it
RSS