I am sorry to have to say it, but The Korean Popular Culture Reader is close to the most disappointing book I have ever had to review.
Not long ago I found myself engrossed in a Korean TV mini-series called Hot Blood. It concerned the unlikely subject of an ambitious car salesman, but the production standards, acting and plot, together, I have to admit, with the extremely photogenic character of many of the performers, made me an instant addict.
It was an example of the much-vaunted genre of K-drama, and such programs have become hugely popular worldwide. I’ve lost track of some of the other titles, both contemporary and historical, I’ve found myself watching, but other sensations have included Stars Falling from the Sky and IRIS 11: New Generation of 2013.
As for the related phenomenon of K-pop, my teenage years are long gone, but I’ve nonetheless watched a number of girl groups cavorting in TV studios and performing songs that some condemn as “bubblegum pop” but which have, even so, attained astronomical ratings on social-media Web sites.
So a book that claims to be a reader relating to these phenomena was surely going to be of interest. What about the cosmetic surgery that’s said to have produced all these flawless faces? What about the near slave conditions in which these teenage groups have allegedly been trained from a very early age? And what about the exceptional screen-writers responsible for these highly watchable Korean dramas? How about the relation of these distinctive art forms to fashion, to Korean politics, to exports of other Korean products, not to mention the fan-hysteria (unmatched, some say, since the days of the Beatles), and the companies such as S M Entertainment behind these pop groups? A book that threw light on such things would surely make compelling reading.
Sadly — indeed astonishingly — almost none of these subjects, not even the pop groups themselves, let alone the TV dramas, are treated in any real depth in The Korean Popular Culture Reader.
Instead its main text opens with a chapter on early 20th century fiction, followed by one on Korean comics in the 1970s, then one on computer games, then one on the Internet as the medium for K-dramas (but little on the dramas themselves). Next come two chapters on Korean film in the 1950s, followed by one on North Korean film, and a final one in this movie section on a 2003 product designed to confront various forms of discrimination.
I couldn’t believe my eyes when, already at page 195, I found that next came a section on – sport!
Already exhausted, I turned to a Web site called “goodreads,” to find two young ladies who had been “awarded” copies of the book and had given it five stars without, in either case, having read it. One was “looking forward to reading it,” while another said she hadn’t read it yet, but loved K-pop and drama. I thought both had a major disappointment coming.
I pressed on nonetheless. After the sports section came, on page 249, a section on music. I was wrong to be relieved, however. Its first chapter was on the 1930s, the decade of our present girl groups’ great grandparents, then came a moderately interesting one on Korean rock groups in the 1960s and 1970s and their problems with the authorities, then an essay on the music of the 1990s.
Finally, on page 314, I arrived at a chapter on the phenomenon of the present-day girl groups. This was an oasis in the veritable desert surrounding it. It considered videos by Girls’ Generation, KARA, After School, Miss-A, 4Minute, 2NE1 and f(x). It questioned somewhat predictably whether they really represented an “escape from patriarchy,” but ended up by interestingly noting that Girls’ Generation were said to be made to live on only 1,200 calories a day, and that currently half of Korean high-school girls were unable to donate blood because of anemia and malnutrition caused by dieting.
There was, I admit, the routine reference to “late capitalism,” but nevertheless, with its quoted claim that 60 percent of girl group members admitted to pressure from their managers to wear revealing clothing and/or perform dance moves with which they were uncomfortable, this was an insightful and relevant chapter. Would that more of the book had been like that.
With 50 pages still to go, I still had hopes of more on what the book’s title had promised. But I discovered — to my horror — that all they contained were chapters on tourism, Korean cuisine, and an academic’s trip to North Korea.
The fundamental problem with this product is that its publishers desperately want to appeal to the huge global following that K-pop and K-drama have won (rightly or wrongly), but that most of the commissioned academics know next to nothing about it, and fall back on writing about their research topics, which are inevitably largely historical.
But that’s not all. In the book’s promotional material, Psy’s record-breaking Gangnam Style video, with some two billion hits on YouTube not counting parodies, is described as “silly.” Can something that’s received MTV Europe’s Music Award for Best Video, and has been watched by approaching a quarter of the world’s population, be labeled “silly” without a patronizing tone creeping in? I don’t think so. To patronize, and at the same time seek to please those you’re patronizing, is, it seems to me, an especially lethal combination.
The moral is, never trust literary academics, at least of the current generation, and when they’re attempting to elucidate popular culture, don’t trust them under any circumstances. They have no idea what it is, have little to say about it and, in this particular case, mostly don’t even try.
Edited by Kyung Hyun Kim and Youngmin Choe
Duke University Pres
To the consternation of its biological father — China — the young nation of Taiwan seems to prefer its step-dad, Japan. When the latter was forced out, a semi-modernized iteration of the former returned. And just as some people thrive as adults, despite an unstable childhood, Taiwan has become a democratic success. Unfortunately, the island’s biological father behaves like a parent who is no use, yet who continues to meddle. A combination of rose-tinted retrospection and growing mutual respect has given many Taiwanese a highly positive attitude toward Japan. Physical reminders of the 1895-1945 period of Japanese rule are treasured,
A year before Britain handed Hong Kong to China, then-president Jiang Zemin (江澤民) hailed the “one country, two systems” plan for the city as a model for the country to one day unify with Taiwan. Taiwan would get “a high degree of autonomy” — the same pledge China used for Hong Kong — while keeping legislative and independent judicial power, and its own armed forces, according to Jiang’s speech, copies of which were distributed at Hong Kong’s handover center in 1997. For Taiwan though, the proposal has never been an option. Even the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) — a vestige of
Last month China lashed out at Taiwanese agricultural exports again, banning grouper imports. This event marked the ignominious end of what was once the star agricultural product of the ill-starred Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement (ECFA). Local media quoted the Fisheries Agency as saying it was a turning point in Taiwan’s grouper history. Spurred by the signing of ECFA, by the spring of 2011 grouper had become the leading agricultural export, driving profits for middlemen and food price inflation. Grouper exports were among the few products whose market grew, enabling then-president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) to
Women in Taiwan often say “my aunt is visiting” (大姨媽來了) or “my ‘that’ is here” (那個來) when their menstrual cycle arrives — but there are no euphemisms to describe it at the Red House Period Museum (小紅厝月經博物館), which opened on Thursday. “Due to a lack of understanding, fear of blood and various taboos, the period has historically and globally been something that cannot be discussed publicly,” a display on period stigma at the museum states. “Or, it is replaced by all sorts of indirection.” The museum estimates that there are more than 30 such terms in Taiwan to describe that