Sixty paintings from the Boston-based Museum of Bad Art (MOBA) are currently on display at the Huashan 1914 Creative Park. Created not by acclaimed artists but ordinary people, these works boast oddities, absurdities or simply ugliness — qualities that are equally as eye-catching as exquisite fine art.
The museum numbers more than 600 pieces in its permanent collection, many of them purchased from thrift shops, yard sales and secondhand stores. Part of the collection was donated by its creators, while some were retrieved from rubbish bins.
To be accepted by MOBA, the work must be original, have had no prior appearance in a museum or gallery, and possess a certain attention-grabbing quality.
Photos Courtesy of Kuan Hung Arts
For example, Mama and Babe — a half-length portrait of two females with rigid facial contours — screams contrasting colors of red and green. Its title suggests that the figures are mother and daughter, and the explanatory panel indicates that the mother is a parody of a former US first lady.
Poor execution of artistic expression doesn’t guarantee a ticket to MOBA’s collection. Pablo Presley was selected for showcasing a version of Elvis Presley that’s different from the typical Elvis-in-black-velvet portraits found in many souvenir shops, says the exhibition catalog. The creator of this painting, Bonnie Daly, had taken another approach, interpreting the King of Rock ‘n’ Roll in the style of Pablo Picasso.
Some paintings look like nothing special until closer examination. Red Rose Serenade features a piano keyboard with incorrectly arranged keys — an oddity that begs an observant eye to detect it.
Photos Courtesy of Kuan Hung Arts
The exhibition includes several imitations of masterpieces. Badminton Anyone? vaguely resembles 18th-century French painter Jean-Baptiste-Simeon Chardin’s Girl with Shuttlecock in terms of composition. But Badminton Anyone? features a boyish-looking woman and a modern-day racquet that stray from the original big-time, and its far-from-competent technique evokes a smile.
Even though MOBA seems to imply there’s a such thing as “bad art,” its underlying message calls for an open-minded spirit in art appreciation. By showing ordinary paintings that were never meant to enter fine art museums or to be displayed in public, MOBA questions what qualifies as art. Amateur artists may lack the sophisticated drawing skill of professionals, but the value of their works isn’t necessarily lesser.
That being said, many of the explanatory panels in this exhibition illuminate not only how MOBA acquired the work but also provide art commentary, which either leads or limits the viewer’s mind. Instead of including commentary on the panels, curators should have set up a separate section for such information to avoid explaining too much on the spot.
Photos Courtesy of Kuan Hung Arts
Another problem is that the 60 paintings are categorized into 11 sections based on confusing, often capricious criteria. For instance, paintings in the Poker Area don’t really have anything to do with the card game, but are simply presented on large poker cards. Other sections such as the Furnace Area, Bed Area and Spider Net Area are home to paintings that would otherwise have been burnt, hidden under the bed or covered by a spider net, but the value of grouping paintings in this way was lost for this reviewer. Without this extra layer of meaning imposed on the paintings, MOBA’s message might have been more accessible.
Photos Courtesy of Kuan Hung Arts
Photos Courtesy of Kuan Hung Arts
Photos Courtesy of Kuan Hung Arts
In the March 9 edition of the Taipei Times a piece by Ninon Godefroy ran with the headine “The quiet, gentle rhythm of Taiwan.” It started with the line “Taiwan is a small, humble place. There is no Eiffel Tower, no pyramids — no singular attraction that draws the world’s attention.” I laughed out loud at that. This was out of no disrespect for the author or the piece, which made some interesting analogies and good points about how both Din Tai Fung’s and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC, 台積電) meticulous attention to detail and quality are not quite up to
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) hatched a bold plan to charge forward and seize the initiative when he held a protest in front of the Taipei City Prosecutors’ Office. Though risky, because illegal, its success would help tackle at least six problems facing both himself and the KMT. What he did not see coming was Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (將萬安) tripping him up out of the gate. In spite of Chu being the most consequential and successful KMT chairman since the early 2010s — arguably saving the party from financial ruin and restoring its electoral viability —
It is one of the more remarkable facts of Taiwan history that it was never occupied or claimed by any of the numerous kingdoms of southern China — Han or otherwise — that lay just across the water from it. None of their brilliant ministers ever discovered that Taiwan was a “core interest” of the state whose annexation was “inevitable.” As Paul Kua notes in an excellent monograph laying out how the Portuguese gave Taiwan the name “Formosa,” the first Europeans to express an interest in occupying Taiwan were the Spanish. Tonio Andrade in his seminal work, How Taiwan Became Chinese,
April 28 to May 4 During the Japanese colonial era, a city’s “first” high school typically served Japanese students, while Taiwanese attended the “second” high school. Only in Taichung was this reversed. That’s because when Taichung First High School opened its doors on May 1, 1915 to serve Taiwanese students who were previously barred from secondary education, it was the only high school in town. Former principal Hideo Azukisawa threatened to quit when the government in 1922 attempted to transfer the “first” designation to a new local high school for Japanese students, leading to this unusual situation. Prior to the Taichung First
RSS