In the Hong Kong Supermarket on Hester Street in Manhattan, Elisa Kao was scrutinizing the labels on cans of shashajiang (沙茶醬) the way a forensic scientist examines sets of fingerprints. Hardly an unusual sight in Chinatown, Kao was doing what many Asian-Americans have done for years whenever they shop at Chinese supermarkets in the US — she was searching for recognizable brands made in Taiwan.
But this time, it was for a different reason.
“Now, who knows what’s safe to eat,” Kao said. “Maybe I should start looking for ‘made in China’ instead.”
Photo: Chris Fuchs
For decades, three simple words — Made in Taiwan — stamped on canned and packaged food items sold in Chinese supermarkets in the US conveyed a guarantee of quality and excellence. But in the wake of Taiwan’s widening food scandal, Chinese and Taiwanese-Americans living in New York, home to the largest overseas Chinese population in the US, say they are thinking twice about what they put in their carts.
Food scare
“In the past, I used to buy Taiwan, but after the recent news reports came out, I’m a little scared,” said one customer, surnamed Hsu (許), who was searching for chili paste at Jmart, an Asian-specialty supermarket in Flushing, New York. “Now I’m buying Korean and Japanese items instead.”
Photos: Chris Fuchs
Two weeks ago, the Wu Mu (五木) brand of steamed spinach ramen noodles, manufactured by Sing-Lin Foods Corporation (興霖), was the latest addition to the growing list of made-in-Taiwan products implicated in the country’s widening food safety scandal. After testing positive for sodium copper chlorophyllin, a coloring agent permitted in food items like gum and dried seaweed but not in noodles, Wu Mu’s spinach-flavored ramen was pulled from shelves at Jmart and the Hong Kong Supermarket, two of New York’s most popular Asian-specialty superstores, cashiers and employees said.
At Jmart, other flavors of Wu Mu ramen, including pickled mustard (雲林榨菜拉麵) and steamed mushrooms (香菇拉麵) reduced to US$1.99 a package, remained on shelves since they were not affected, workers said. Managers from Jmart, the Hong Kong Supermarket and the Great Wall Supermarket, another popular chain in New York, did not return phone calls and e-mails seeking comment about whether customers could get a refund for previously-purchased Wu Mu noodles, or other items linked to the food scandal, and what they planned to do with any returned merchandise.
No recall, yet
Photo: Taipei Times
As of Tuesday, the US Food and Drug Administration (US FDA) had not issued any recalls for Wu Mu noodles or other items linked to Taiwan’s food safety scare, including those manufactured by Wei Chuan Food Corp (味全), Chang Chi Foodstuff Factory Co (大統長基), Formosa Oilseed Processing Co (福懋) and Flavor Full Foods (富味鄉), according to the agency’s Web site.
When asked about how the US FDA issues recalls for potentially harmful FDA-regulated products, an agency spokeswoman, Juli Ann Putnam, referred to the FDA’s Web site, which said that “recalls are almost always voluntary” and that “only in rare cases will the FDA request a recall.”
On a blustery Saturday evening last weekend in Flushing, Queens, home to many Taiwanese-Americans during the 1980s, shoppers at Jmart in the New World Mall lingered just a little longer than usual on the instant noodle aisle, mulling over which of the dozens of brands they should buy, as news of Taiwan’s food scandal made headlines in local Chinese-language newspapers and on Chinese-language news broadcasts.
One middle-aged woman from Guangzhou, surnamed Dong (東), said that she usually does not follow the news, but that this time was different.
“If you’re comparing China and Taiwan, I prefer brands from Taiwan a little bit more,” Dong said. “The food situation in China has always been a mess, but now in Taiwan, it’s almost the same.”
Xu, who said she has eaten Wu Mu ramen noodles, agreed with Dong.
“Chinese products are not trustworthy,” said Xu, who is also from China. “But the quality in Taiwan now is more variable than ever. I usually would buy brand names that you often see advertised. For instance, I used to buy Kimlan (金蘭醬油) soy sauce. Now, I don’t necessarily buy things from Taiwan.”
MIT: No longer sign of quality
Many shoppers interviewed last weekend said they began changing their opinion about made-in-Taiwan brands in 2011, when plasticizer Di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) was found in emulsifying additives used in everything from sports beverages to fruit jelly. Regarded as a cheap substitute for palm oil, plasticizers have been linked to developmental problems in children and are illegal in foods.
Still, some Jmart shoppers, including Helen Chen, said they were trying to take the latest food-safety scare in stride.
“If it sounds like it tastes good, I’ll buy it, no matter who makes it or where it comes from,” Chen said. “But I’m still surprised about this news from Taiwan. It’s got my attention.”
Besides keeping straight the growing number of companies added to the made-in-Taiwan blacklist, wearied Chinese and Taiwanese-American shoppers pointed out that they also face another challenge that emerged before the integrity of Taiwanese food items had been called into question — making sure that the brands they purchase are actually the real thing.
“See the character ‘fu’ (父)? That’s not the same as this ‘fu’ (傅),” a student from Zhejiang, China, surnamed Zhang (張), said as she held up a package of Kang Shi-fu (康師父) instant noodles, distributed by a Brooklyn warehouse, and compared it to Master Kong (康師傅), the famous Chinese brand established in 1991 by two Taiwanese brothers that is owned by Ting Hsin International Group (頂新集團).
One of those brothers, Ting Hsin chairman Wei Ying-chun (魏應充), was indicted two weeks ago on charges of fraud, mislabeling products and violating the Act Governing Food Sanitation (食品衛生管理法) in connection with adulterated oil purchased from the Chang Chi Foodstuff Factory Co that Ting Hsin allegedly produced and marketed under the Wei Chuan brand.
Zhang said she was aware of Taiwan’s on-going food safety issues and said she knew oil was one of the blacklisted items. But, Zhang added, she did not know that Master Kong had also been ensnared in the food scandal.
When asked if this had changed her mind about which “Kang Shi-fu” she would buy, Zhang paused and cracked a smile.
“I think I still prefer Master Kong,” she said. “It’s extremely popular in China. It’s the real thing.”
Many people noticed the flood of pro-China propaganda across a number of venues in recent weeks that looks like a coordinated assault on US Taiwan policy. It does look like an effort intended to influence the US before the meeting between US President Donald Trump and Chinese dictator Xi Jinping (習近平) over the weekend. Jennifer Kavanagh’s piece in the New York Times in September appears to be the opening strike of the current campaign. She followed up last week in the Lowy Interpreter, blaming the US for causing the PRC to escalate in the Philippines and Taiwan, saying that as
US President Donald Trump may have hoped for an impromptu talk with his old friend Kim Jong-un during a recent trip to Asia, but analysts say the increasingly emboldened North Korean despot had few good reasons to join the photo-op. Trump sent repeated overtures to Kim during his barnstorming tour of Asia, saying he was “100 percent” open to a meeting and even bucking decades of US policy by conceding that North Korea was “sort of a nuclear power.” But Pyongyang kept mum on the invitation, instead firing off missiles and sending its foreign minister to Russia and Belarus, with whom it
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has a dystopian, radical and dangerous conception of itself. Few are aware of this very fundamental difference between how they view power and how the rest of the world does. Even those of us who have lived in China sometimes fall back into the trap of viewing it through the lens of the power relationships common throughout the rest of the world, instead of understanding the CCP as it conceives of itself. Broadly speaking, the concepts of the people, race, culture, civilization, nation, government and religion are separate, though often overlapping and intertwined. A government
Nov. 3 to Nov. 9 In 1925, 18-year-old Huang Chin-chuan (黃金川) penned the following words: “When will the day of women’s equal rights arrive, so that my talents won’t drift away in the eastern stream?” These were the closing lines to her poem “Female Student” (女學生), which expressed her unwillingness to be confined to traditional female roles and her desire to study and explore the world. Born to a wealthy family on Nov. 5, 1907, Huang was able to study in Japan — a rare privilege for women in her time — and even made a name for herself in the
RSS