Krystyna Jensen is facing a problem. Though she’s made Taiwan her home for the past 15 years, the National Taiwan University of the Arts (國立台灣藝術大學) student will probably be forced to leave the country upon graduation.
For the past year, Jensen has been the public face for a Taipei MRT promotional video, as foreign backpacker “Sara” who came to tour Taipei’s attractions with her Taiwanese friend “Bill”.
The video touts Taipei as a world-class cultured city, with its cleanliness and orderliness, while the MRT riders are shown as courteous and law-abiding. Thus “MRT Sara” has been likened to a “Goodwill Ambassador,” helping to promote Taipei City and the MRT for both the local and international audience.
Photo: Lin Enru, Taipei Times
But now she is facing a dilemma of personal identity and cultural belonging. Bound by government regulations, Jensen will have to leave the country when she graduates from university next year. She needs to have an ARC (Alien Resident Certificate) from the National Immigration Agency (NIA) to stay.
“But I grew up in Taiwan, this is all I have ever known. I love Taiwan, and I want to stay here, finish my studies and work in Taiwan,” Jensen said in an interview with the Taipei Times.
Jensen first arrived in Taiwan with her German father and Polish mother a decade-and-a-half ago, when her father landed a job here. Over the course of her 15-year stint, Jensen has lived in Greater Kaohsiung, Tamshui and Taipei City.
Why not move to Germany or Poland?
“Taiwan is my home, I have lived here for 15 years. All my friends are here. I am familiar with Taiwanese culture, the way of living here,” she said, adding, “If I go to Germany, it would be too difficult. I don’t know German culture well and have few contacts. All I have is here in Taiwan. I have no idea how I could live and work in Germany,” she said.
This is at core of her dilemma.
Jensen is a rather special case, different from most people’s image of a foreigner in Taiwan. She writes about her school days, hangs out with Taiwanese classmates and posts about her travels around Taiwan on Facebook. She speaks and writes Mandarin fluently and understands Hoklo (commonly known as Taiwanese). Her classmates at National Taiwan University of the Arts call her Lei Ti-na (雷堤娜).
“I believe my future is in Taiwan, so I want to stay here to further my career,” she said.
Jensen is making every effort to staying in Taiwan, including an actively read Facebook campaign.
“To obtain an ARC, I am forced to find a job, which is difficult these days. I am not wealthy enough to invest. Another way is to marry a Taiwanese. But I am too young, and want to do many things,” she explained.
GET A JOB
When contacted by the Taipei Times, an NIA official explained that for children of foreigners working in Taiwan, there is no impediment to obtaining an ARC.
“After finishing university, or once they’ve reached 20 years of age, they are no longer considered dependent on their parents. They can get an ARC by getting a full-time job,” she said.
Jensen, however, said this is easier said than done.
“The ARC regulation was set up without any consideration for people like me, who are doing performing arts, dance and theatre. It is very difficult for people in this field to get regular full-time jobs. And also, companies are now hiring only part-time or temp jobs for young people,” she said.
Jensen stressed that this does not just concern herself. She is fighting for her two younger brothers, who were born in Taiwan but face expulsion when they grow up.
She hopes hers and her brothers’ cases can raise public awareness of the plight facing children of foreigners working in Taiwan.
“When the ARC regulations were instituted many years ago, the government only had business professionals in mind.”
“They did not think of foreigners having families and children. When the children grow up in Taiwan, they go to school, and put down roots here. But they face legal residency problems, and are forced to leave. We want to stay and live in Taiwan, so we hope the regulations can be amended to take our situation into account,” Jensen said.
For more details, go to: www.facebook.com/groups/ForeignersForTaiwan and www.facebook.com/groups/TaiwanDREAM/
The Taiwan of yesteryear was dominated in whole or in part by the Dutch, Spanish, Qing Empire and Japanese. But is the Taiwanese name for a popular edible fish derived from the Portuguese language? Cheng Wei-chung (鄭維中), an associate research fellow at Academia Sinica’s Institute of Taiwan History, says yes. The fish in question is the narrow-barred Spanish mackerel, which was listed in early 18th century Qing local gazetteers as Taiwanese specialities alongside milk fish and mullet, according to Cheng’s paper, “Mullet, narrow-barred Spanish mackerel and milkfish: Multiple contextual developments of three certified seafood specilaities in Taiwan, from the
Aug. 10 to Aug. 16 They called him the “No Problem Doctor” (沒關係醫生) because that’s what he always told his patients when they couldn’t pay up. Operating the only clinic in Changhua County’s Pusin Township (埔心) during the 1950s, Hsu Tsai-chih (許再枝) knew that life was difficult in his remote hometown. “They barely had enough to survive, so it was pointless to chase after them for the money,” an 81-year-old Hsu told the United Daily News in 2002. “I just went with the flow, some offered to pay me back years later but I had already forgotten
I didn’t expect to spend more than three minutes out of my car, yet the sun was so brutal I put on my hat before approaching the seawall. Beimen (北門) is the flattest and most sun-baked part of Tainan. It lacks trees and people. In wintertime, the weather is often delightful. It wasn’t yet mid-morning in the hot season, however, and I felt like a leaf shriveling in the desert. Atop the seawall but facing inland, I could see dozens of the rectangular ponds which account for a significant percentage of Beimen’s “land” area. Some, no doubt, were dug to produce
A widely criticized peer-reviewed study that measured the attractiveness of women with endometriosis has been retracted from the medical journal Fertility and Sterility. The study, “Attractiveness of women with rectovaginal endometriosis: a case-control study,” was first published in 2013 and has been defended by the authors and the journal in the intervening years despite heavy criticism from doctors, other researchers and people with endometriosis for its ethical concerns and dubious justifications, with one advocate calling the study “heartbreaking” and “disgusting.” The study’s conclusion was: “Women with rectovaginal endometriosis were judged to be more attractive than those in the two control groups.