This weekend, the Commonwealth countries observe Remembrance Day, which falls every year on Nov. 11, to honor those who fought in World War II.
Here in Taiwan, there will also be a series of events to commemorate Allied soldiers who fought in Asia, particularly those imprisoned by the Japanese.
From 1942 to 1945, during its colonial rule, Japan brought more than 4,300 prisoners of war (POW) to Taiwan, interning them in camps across the island.
Photo courtesy of taiwan pow camps memorial society
The Taiwan POW Camps Memorial Society is holding its annual commemorative activities this week, which includes a Remembrance Day service on Sunday at the Taiwan Prisoner of War Memorial Park at New Taipei City’s Jinguashih (金瓜石), near Jiufen (九份). The event is being held in cooperation with the New Zealand Commerce and Industry Office.
The Society, founded and run by Canadian expat Michael Hurst, first brought attention to POW camps in Taiwan by successfully campaigning to build the country’s first POW memorial in Jinguashih in 1997.
Since then, Hurst and the society has established contact with more than 300 former POW survivors and their families, and identified and located all 14 of the Japanese-run camps in Taiwan.
Photo courtesy of taiwan pow camps memorial society
To date, the Society has built seven POW memorials, including a 17m-long memorial wall at Jingguashih, which was inaugurated last year and is inscribed with the names of all POWs who were imprisoned in Taiwan, often under dire conditions.
“That’s what this is all about, making sure their story is told and they’re remembered,” said Hurst, a businessman who has lived in Taiwan for 24 years and is considered the de facto expert on the history of allied POWs in Taiwan.
The event of note this year by the Society will be the unveiling of the Karenko POW Camp Memorial in Hualien on Monday.
Karenko, located at a present-day military base, was used by the Japanese to imprison high-level military officers and government officials representing Allied forces in the region, says Hurst.
Among those prisoners was Merton Beckwith-Smith, a Major-General with the British 18th Division. Members of Beckwith-Smith’s family will be at the ceremony in Hualien on Monday.
At the Karenko camp, the Japanese army subjected the POWs to hard labor and “delighted in humiliating the senior officers,” said Hurst.
And as Japan did not sign the Geneva Convention, those at Karenko were not protected by the treaty’s call for humane treatment of POWs.
“Working them to death, starving them to death, withholding medicine — it was all part of the generic way that the Japanese treated the Allied prisoners of war right from Thailand to Manchuria,” he said.
But healing is very much one of the central aims of the Taiwan POW Camps Memorial Society, says Hurst, who is also in regular contact with Taiwanese veterans who served under the Japanese.
Over the past decade, the Society has escorted POW survivors to the sites of their former imprisonment in Taiwan, but fewer are returning these days as many of the veterans are in their 90s, and are unable to travel.
Hurst has also established friendships with many POWs during his fifteen years of research and involvement with the Society.
“For me, the greatest honors or rewards that I have is having met these heroes, having met these men who overcame these horrific conditions of starvation and brutality, and illness and disease,” he said.
All are welcome to join the dedication ceremony for the Karenko POW Camp Memorial in Hualien on Monday. The ceremony, co-sponsored by the Ministry of Defense, takes place at 2pm at the Ministry of Defense Military Court East Coast Office (國防部北部地方軍事法院檢察署東部檢察官辦公室), located at 643 Jhongjheng Rd, Hualien City (花蓮市中正路643號).
Tomorrow’s Remembrance Day service at Jinguashih takes place at 11am. The event is open to the public, and visitors from Taipei can reach the site by taking the 1062 bus from the Zhongxiao Fuxing MRT Station (忠孝復興捷運站), Exit 1. Fare is NT$95 one-way and travel time is around 90 minutes.
More information on the events, as well as the history of Allied POWs in Taiwan, can be found at www.powtaiwan.org
Has the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) changed under the leadership of Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌)? In tone and messaging, it obviously has, but this is largely driven by events over the past year. How much is surface noise, and how much is substance? How differently party founder Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) would have handled these events is impossible to determine because the biggest event was Ko’s own arrest on multiple corruption charges and being jailed incommunicado. To understand the similarities and differences that may be evolving in the Huang era, we must first understand Ko’s TPP. ELECTORAL STRATEGY The party’s strategy under Ko was
Before the recall election drowned out other news, CNN last month became the latest in a long line of media organs to report on abuses of migrant workers in Taiwan’s fishing fleet. After a brief flare of interest, the news media moved on. The migrant worker issues, however, did not. CNN’s stinging title, “Taiwan is held up as a bastion of liberal values. But migrant workers report abuse, injury and death in its fishing industry,” was widely quoted, including by the Fisheries Agency in its response. It obviously hurt. The Fisheries Agency was not slow to convey a classic government
It’s Aug. 8, Father’s Day in Taiwan. I asked a Chinese chatbot a simple question: “How is Father’s Day celebrated in Taiwan and China?” The answer was as ideological as it was unexpected. The AI said Taiwan is “a region” (地區) and “a province of China” (中國的省份). It then adopted the collective pronoun “we” to praise the holiday in the voice of the “Chinese government,” saying Father’s Day aligns with “core socialist values” of the “Chinese nation.” The chatbot was DeepSeek, the fastest growing app ever to reach 100 million users (in seven days!) and one of the world’s most advanced and
It turns out many Americans aren’t great at identifying which personal decisions contribute most to climate change. A study recently published by the National Academy of Sciences found that when asked to rank actions, such as swapping a car that uses gasoline for an electric one, carpooling or reducing food waste, participants weren’t very accurate when assessing how much those actions contributed to climate change, which is caused mostly by the release of greenhouse gases that happen when fuels like gasoline, oil and coal are burned. “People over-assign impact to actually pretty low-impact actions such as recycling, and underestimate the actual carbon
RSS