After largely ignoring photography over the past decades, Taiwan’s galleries, museums and art fairs are duly making up for lost time.
The Museum of Contemporary Art, Taipei (MOCA, Taipei) steps into the picture with New Generation Photographers of Taiwan (台灣新世代攝影), a group show that presents the work of 13 “up-and-coming talents.” According to the exhibition introduction, the show attempts to reveal the “perspective of the new era, which goes beyond the traditional and conservative notion of photography held by past generations.”
Who are the old fuddy-duddy photographers that the museum’s blurb refers to? Perhaps Chang Tsai (張才), honored with a retrospective at the Taipei Fine Arts Museum last year? Or, closer to our “era,” Magnum photographer Chang Chien-chi (張乾琦)? It doesn’t say. In any event, this is MOCA’s first group show devoted purely to Taiwanese photographers (last year’s four-person exhibit at the Zhongshan MRT excluded), and it’s perhaps telling that it is shown in its Studio gallery rather than in the museum’s main exhibit space.
Photo courtesy of MOCA, Taipei
Still, curator Suan Hooi-wah (全會華), who runs the Taiwan International Visual Art Center, a gallery devoted to photography, has put together a fine exhibit — though the variety of work on display makes a coherent theme practically impossible. The show does, however, offer a panoramic perspective of what preoccupies this “new generation” of photographers: landscapes, people and art. Sound familiar? It should. And many of the photographers give explicit reference to what has come before.
Every section comes with an artist statement, succinct in style, as a guide for the viewer. Take Sim Chang (張哲榕): He uses “the power of pink to turn this world into an amusement park full of happiness and joy.” He’s not kidding. These cutesy photographs, many shot at theme parks, depict a doll-like woman dressed in a garish pink skirt and yellow rubber boots. Think waipai (outside photography, 外拍), popularized during the Japanese colonial era and revised over the past five years as amateur photographers and would-be models hit Taiwan’s most scenic locations.
Though Feng Chun-lan (馮君藍) whimsically dubs himself a “foolish sinner,” his monochrome portraits — a man holding an oil lamp or a pouting boy staring melancholically at the viewer — are anything but whimsical. Feng, a pastor at the Taiwan Chinese Rhenish Church (台灣中華基督教禮賢會), employs the precepts of Christian anthropology to create “spiritual portraits” that are, in this reviewer’s opinion, the show’s best because of their haunting psychological depictions of their subjects.
Photo courtesy of MOCA, Taipei
There are also some works evoking particular art styles, such as Deng Bo-ren’s (鄧博仁) delightfully amateurish collage works that comment on fashion and consumerism, and Chou Chih-lung’s (周志龍) surreal bedroom scenes. Elaine Lee’s (李宣儀) multiple-exposure color photographs, without digital manipulation, were inspired by the “atmospheric impressions” of 19th century paintings. For this reviewer, however, they are expressionist renderings at best, reminiscent of Zao Wou-ki’s (趙無極) late-1960s autumnal paintings.
But for the most part, Taiwan’s changing landscapes and cityscapes serve as the exhibit’s focal point. At first glance, Chung Shun-lung’s (鍾順龍) pictures of concrete columns (the kind used to construct freeways) look like drab photos taken by an engineer. Twenty minutes later, however, our party of three was still discussing the images’ techniques and topography.
Chung’s photos delineate the disjunction between past and present, the pillars disappearing into the horizon of some partially constructed future. The photos hint at the ongoing process of industrialization, its pristine white pillars rising up from the rice fields of Taiwan’s rapidly disappearing agricultural society.
Photo courtesy of MOCA, Taipei
Taiwan’s ongoing development is similarly addressed by Chang Hsiao-chen (張小成). His images capture the manner in which a torn down structure imprints itself on the facade of other buildings that remain standing: the muddy silhouette of a small shack or the exposed brick outline of a demolished building. For Chang Hsiao-chen, the walls of a standing building serve as a metaphor for a headstone, the imprint its epitaph.
There is much else to see here that is worthwhile and this reviewer looks forward to future photography exhibits by Taiwan’s artists at MOCA. And, dare I say, in its main gallery space. There are plenty of subjects to draw on: portraiture from World War II to the present, or buildings ranging from pre-Japanese colonial era hovels to the phallic Taipei 101. As this exhibit reveals — along with shows at many other venues over the past two years — Taiwan certainly isn’t lacking in photographers who can depict the present with an eye on the past.
Photo courtesy of MOCA, Taipei
Photo courtesy of MOCA, Taipei
June 2 to June 8 Taiwan’s woodcutters believe that if they see even one speck of red in their cooked rice, no matter how small, an accident is going to happen. Peng Chin-tian (彭錦田) swears that this has proven to be true at every stop during his decades-long career in the logging industry. Along with mining, timber harvesting was once considered the most dangerous profession in Taiwan. Not only were mishaps common during all stages of processing, it was difficult to transport the injured to get medical treatment. Many died during the arduous journey. Peng recounts some of his accidents in
“Why does Taiwan identity decline?”a group of researchers lead by University of Nevada political scientist Austin Wang (王宏恩) asked in a recent paper. After all, it is not difficult to explain the rise in Taiwanese identity after the early 1990s. But no model predicted its decline during the 2016-2018 period, they say. After testing various alternative explanations, Wang et al argue that the fall-off in Taiwanese identity during that period is related to voter hedging based on the performance of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP). Since the DPP is perceived as the guardian of Taiwan identity, when it performs well,
A short walk beneath the dense Amazon canopy, the forest abruptly opens up. Fallen logs are rotting, the trees grow sparser and the temperature rises in places sunlight hits the ground. This is what 24 years of severe drought looks like in the world’s largest rainforest. But this patch of degraded forest, about the size of a soccer field, is a scientific experiment. Launched in 2000 by Brazilian and British scientists, Esecaflor — short for “Forest Drought Study Project” in Portuguese — set out to simulate a future in which the changing climate could deplete the Amazon of rainfall. It is
The Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) on May 18 held a rally in Taichung to mark the anniversary of President William Lai’s (賴清德) inauguration on May 20. The title of the rally could be loosely translated to “May 18 recall fraudulent goods” (518退貨ㄌㄨㄚˋ！). Unlike in English, where the terms are the same, “recall” (退貨) in this context refers to product recalls due to damaged, defective or fraudulent merchandise, not the political recalls (罷免) currently dominating the headlines. I attended the rally to determine if the impression was correct that the TPP under party Chairman Huang Kuo-Chang (黃國昌) had little of a
RSS