The explosives had been set, the watchtower manned and the dirt battlefield cleared of rubble. Communist soldiers armed with rifles took up positions at the foot of the barren hills. Their foes, the Chinese Nationalists (KMT), loomed in the distance, advancing on the garrison town of Yanan.
Then someone yelled, “There’s no electricity!”
No electricity meant no show.
PHOTO: BLOOMBERG
Hundreds of Chinese tourists streamed toward the front gate demanding their money back. Other visitors stripped off their gray uniforms on the battlefield — they had paid US$2 to take part in the production.
So went a recent performance of “The Defense of Yanan,” an hourlong re-enactment of a crucial moment in the Chinese Civil War, when the KMT tried to overrun the Communists in 1947 in their mountain redoubt here. The show, complete with live explosions and a fighter jet that swoops down on a wire, takes place every morning on the outskirts of Yanan, a dingy city of 2 million in the northern province of Shaanxi.
Capitalism is thriving in China, but red is far from dead, at least in Yanan. “The Defense of Yanan” is a recent addition to tourist attractions that try to evoke the glory days of the Communist Party, after its leaders entered Yanan in 1936 following the Long March. Local officials and businesspeople are profiting handsomely from a boom in “red tourism,” in which Chinese, many of them young professionals, journey to famous revolutionary sites to rekindle their long-lost sense of class struggle and proletarian principles.
“Commercialization is not bad as long as we don’t vulgarize the traditions and as long as we keep the spirit without violating it,” said Tan Huwa, a historian at Yanan University. “It’s like the advertising slogan for Yanan Cigarettes: ‘There is Yanan, but there is also the spirit.”’
The Yanan area, with its distinctive cave homes and yellow loess hills, was used as the main revolutionary base until 1948, enduring bombing by the Japanese during World War II and assaults by KMT troops. It was here that the top Communist leaders — Mao Zedong (毛澤東), Zhou Enlai (周恩來), Zhu De (朱德), Liu Shaoqi (劉少奇) and others — forged the ragtag Red Army into a populist guerrilla force and hammered home socialist ideology.
“I’m here to be educated,” said Ma Tao, 32, a pudgy civil servant who was struggling into a Red Army costume at the entrance to Yangjialing, a narrow valley in Yanan where the Communist leaders had resided in caves for several years. A woman renting out the costumes handed Ma a leather holster.
“I feel proud wearing this uniform,” he said as a friend — or rather, a comrade — snapped photos of him.
Ma and his tour group, all sporting red Mao pins on their lapels, were among thousands of tourists, including real soldiers from the city of Xian, wandering through the revolutionary sites that day. The Yanan tourism bureau says on its Web site that visitors to the city surpassed 10 million last year, up 37 percent from the previous year.
Tourism got a big lift in 2008 when the local government decided to waive ticket prices to the main sites; the same year, the city invested almost US$15 million to build plazas, museums and other showpieces. Officials and investors even wanted to hire Zhang Yimou (張藝謀), a well-known Chinese filmmaker, to produce “The Defense of Yanan,” but they had to settle for one of his associates.
The tourism bureau’s Web site now boasts of the “Yanan Revolutionary Holy Dream.” But there are those familiar with the old Yanan who are not happy with the way renovations have gone.
“There was a stark beauty, this totally primitive cave city that was the brain for the whole war effort in China,” said Sidney Rittenberg Sr, a business consultant who was the first American to join the Chinese Communist Party and lived here in the 1940s.
Rittenberg took his wife to Yanan last year. He said he was stunned by the changes.
“They’ve virtually destroyed this museum to Chinese revolutionary history,” he said. “I think it’s a real travesty.”
“The local tour guides will not allow anyone to criticize Mao,” he added. “It’s the only place in China I know of like that. They know absolutely nothing of the history.”
In the Chairman Mao Exhibition Hall, no mention is made of the horrors of the Great Famine of the 1950s or the Cultural Revolution, nor does there even appear the standard party-endorsed assessment that Mao was 70 percent right and 30 percent wrong. Displays or photographs showing Mao’s compatriots give no indication that those people were later purged by Mao.
A young woman guiding a group of tourists, all middle-aged men, pointed to a photo on the wall. “This is Mao and Jiang Qing (江青) and their daughters,” she said.
One man peered closer. “Jiang Qing isn’t ugly here!” he yelled.
The Communist leaders lived in four different sites around Yanan, the most impressive being the valley at Yangjialing. It was here in the Central Great Auditorium that some of the most important meetings were held. In 1945, during the 50-day session of the 7th Party Congress, Mao secured his position as undisputed leader of the party and enshrined Maoist “thought” in the party constitution. The hall, which could seat 1,000 people on wooden benches, was damaged in a KMT air raid and has since been rebuilt.
The cave at Yangjialing where Mao lived for five years has been well maintained. Mosquito netting drapes over the bed. Fresh cigarettes lie scattered atop the sheets, tossed there by tourists as a sign of reverence. Along a walkway outside, pine trees and a sign mark the spot where Mao supposedly met in 1946 with Anna Louise Strong, an American journalist. In the interview, he uttered one of his iconic sayings: “All reactionaries are paper tigers.”
Elsewhere in Yanan, an old meeting hall for the Central Military Command reveals more anachronisms. Banners draped around a wooden stage remind visitors that Mao and his comrades once advocated for a multi-party democracy, in order to unseat the KMT. Those are distant days, indeed. One banner says: “Congratulations to the victory of the anti-Japanese war and achieving democracy as early as possible.”
May 6 to May 12 Those who follow the Chinese-language news may have noticed the usage of the term zhuge (豬哥, literally ‘pig brother,’ a male pig raised for breeding purposes) in reports concerning the ongoing #Metoo scandal in the entertainment industry. The term’s modern connotations can range from womanizer or lecher to sexual predator, but it once referred to an important rural trade. Until the 1970s, it was a common sight to see a breeder herding a single “zhuge” down a rustic path with a bamboo whip, often traveling large distances over rugged terrain to service local families. Not only
Ahead of incoming president William Lai’s (賴清德) inauguration on May 20 there appear to be signs that he is signaling to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and that the Chinese side is also signaling to the Taiwan side. This raises a lot of questions, including what is the CCP up to, who are they signaling to, what are they signaling, how with the various actors in Taiwan respond and where this could ultimately go. In the last column, published on May 2, we examined the curious case of Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) heavyweight Tseng Wen-tsan (鄭文燦) — currently vice premier
The last time Mrs Hsieh came to Cihu Park in Taoyuan was almost 50 years ago, on a school trip to the grave of Taiwan’s recently deceased dictator. Busloads of children were brought in to pay their respects to Chiang Kai-shek (蔣中正), known as Generalissimo, who had died at 87, after decades ruling Taiwan under brutal martial law. “There were a lot of buses, and there was a long queue,” Hsieh recalled. “It was a school rule. We had to bow, and then we went home.” Chiang’s body is still there, under guard in a mausoleum at the end of a path
Last week the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) released a set of very strange numbers on Taiwan’s wealth distribution. Duly quoted in the Taipei Times, the report said that “The Gini coefficient for Taiwanese households… was 0.606 at the end of 2021, lower than Australia’s 0.611, the UK’s 0.620, Japan’s 0.678, France’s 0.676 and Germany’s 0.727, the agency said in a report.” The Gini coefficient is a measure of relative inequality, usually of wealth or income, though it can be used to evaluate other forms of inequality. However, for most nations it is a number from .25 to .50