Hong Kong’s beleaguered film industry was a global powerhouse just two decades ago, pumping out 300 movies a year and boasting a fan base that stretched across Asia.
Led by up-and-coming action stars Jackie Chan (成龍) and Chow Yun-fat
(周潤發) along with director John Woo (吳宇森), the city’s film sector was among the world’s most prolific by the late 1980s, trailing only Hollywood and Bollywood.
Woo — whose later directorial credits include Face/Off and Mission: Impossible II — won acclaim for his gritty 1992 cop thriller Hard Boiled, which became synonymous with the wildly popular Hong Kong action genre.
“That’s when Hong Kong film was in its golden age,” said director Mabel Cheung (張婉婷), who jointly produced the drama Echoes of the Rainbow (歲月神偷), which won the Berlin International Film Festival’s Crystal Bear Award in February.
“There was a big market for Hong Kong films with all of these big names back then who were just starting. It was a very exciting time.”
As the Hong Kong Film Awards drew to a close Sunday night, Cheung and others said they hoped the hard-hit sector would enjoy a revival by tapping the mainland Chinese market.
The industry’s swift and brutal fall from grace came as Hollywood lured away Woo and other film giants, moviegoers at home and abroad grew tired of the city’s formulaic action plots and illicit piracy hammered profits.
Some of Hong Kong’s traditional markets, including Taiwan, South Korea and Malaysia, also began developing their own cinema sectors, another blow to its once-mighty film industry, which splashed onto the international scene in the early 1970s with late kung fu legend Bruce Lee’s (李小龍) martial arts blockbusters.
By 2003, the sector was a shell of its former self with spiraling box office receipts and producing just 55 films a year.
“Audiences got tired of the same film over and over again,” Cheung said.
“They demanded new ideas. For a while, Hong Kong films lost direction.”
Now there are early signs Hong Kong’s film sector may claw back some of its former glory with a new generation of directors eager to make a name for themselves, experts said.
“There is new blood pumping into an old industry and there is a general trend worldwide that people want to see local films,” said Jacob Wong (王慶鏘), curator of the Hong Kong International Film Festival Society.
The number of Hong Kong productions — estimated to contribute about US$4.25 billion annually to the local economy — has been rising in recent years and the government is pouring money into a film development fund.
“That’s how Echoes of the Rainbow got made,” Cheung said, referring to the fund. “Otherwise, it might not have seen the light of day.”
Hong Kong’s stylistic filmmaking still holds wide appeal, Wong said, pointing to American director Martin Scorsese’s Oscar-winning 2006 film The Departed, which was a remake of the 2002-2003 Infernal Affairs (無間道) trilogy.
Another homegrown success story, Bodyguards and Assassins (十月圍城), was one of the best-selling movies on the Chinese mainland last year, he said.
“It’s not a watershed, although it marks a turning point,” Wong added.
Still, the industry’s future success depends largely on whether it can become a major player in the fast-growing mainland Chinese market, observers said.
“The [industry] is coming back because of the huge market in China,” said Brian Chung (鍾偉雄), chief executive of the Hong Kong Motion Picture Industry Association.
“There are maybe 5,000 movie screens in China right now. In five years, there will be 10,000. More screens means more money.”
Hong Kong directors, who are already accustomed to tailoring films to different markets, have an edge over mainland producers, who often have a less international outlook, and are familiar with Chinese audiences’ tastes, Chung said.
“The advantage Hong Kong directors have is that they can make a commercial film better than a director in China,” he said.
“The Chinese director treats the work as art, but the Hong Kong director will think of the film as a product suitable for the market.”
There is also room for the Hong Kong and mainland film sectors to join forces with co-productions such as 2008 historical war epic Red Cliff (赤壁), which smashed Chinese box-office records, observers said.
Wong, from the film festival society, agreed that Hong Kong directors should focus on places “where people use chopsticks,” but said producing a film in censorship-heavy mainland China can limit what sort of films get made.
“I’m cautiously optimistic about the industry,” he said. “But I’m pessimistic about quality.”
Perry Lam (林沛理), editor of Hong Kong arts and culture magazine Muse, is not convinced the mainland market will be enough to ensure the industry can turn itself around.
“One can easily find cogent reasons for arguing that the future of Hong Kong cinema lies in embracing the Chinese market,” Lam said.
“Nevertheless, I smell more desperation than inspiration in the latest race to make the Hong Kong cinema mainland-friendly.”
April 28 to May 4 During the Japanese colonial era, a city’s “first” high school typically served Japanese students, while Taiwanese attended the “second” high school. Only in Taichung was this reversed. That’s because when Taichung First High School opened its doors on May 1, 1915 to serve Taiwanese students who were previously barred from secondary education, it was the only high school in town. Former principal Hideo Azukisawa threatened to quit when the government in 1922 attempted to transfer the “first” designation to a new local high school for Japanese students, leading to this unusual situation. Prior to the Taichung First
The Ministry of Education last month proposed a nationwide ban on mobile devices in schools, aiming to curb concerns over student phone addiction. Under the revised regulation, which will take effect in August, teachers and schools will be required to collect mobile devices — including phones, laptops and wearables devices — for safekeeping during school hours, unless they are being used for educational purposes. For Chang Fong-ching (張鳳琴), the ban will have a positive impact. “It’s a good move,” says the professor in the department of
On April 17, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) launched a bold campaign to revive and revitalize the KMT base by calling for an impromptu rally at the Taipei prosecutor’s offices to protest recent arrests of KMT recall campaigners over allegations of forgery and fraud involving signatures of dead voters. The protest had no time to apply for permits and was illegal, but that played into the sense of opposition grievance at alleged weaponization of the judiciary by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) to “annihilate” the opposition parties. Blamed for faltering recall campaigns and faced with a KMT chair
Article 2 of the Additional Articles of the Constitution of the Republic of China (中華民國憲法增修條文) stipulates that upon a vote of no confidence in the premier, the president can dissolve the legislature within 10 days. If the legislature is dissolved, a new legislative election must be held within 60 days, and the legislators’ terms will then be reckoned from that election. Two weeks ago Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) proposed that the legislature hold a vote of no confidence in the premier and dare the president to dissolve the legislature. The legislature is currently controlled
RSS