Richard Rogers may be one of the greatest living architects, but he is far less well known than the buildings he designs. The Pompidou Center, Millennium Dome and Lloyd’s of London are among the more iconic structures that testify to Rogers’ unique vision. A retrospective exhibit at the Taipei Fine Arts Museum, Richard Rogers + Architects: From the House to the City offers a comprehensive look at the architect’s career over the past 40 years.
“It’s nice to know that although we’ve toured the exhibition, this is the grandest space so far. The smallest space was London,” Ivan Harbour, a partner at Rogers’ architectural firm Rogers Stirk Harbour + Partners, quipped at a preview of the show.
Rogers, who missed the opening due to the death of a close friend, works and lives in London. Harbour and Graham Stirk were on hand to introduce the exhibit.
“We’ve been working in Taiwan for about 10 years now. We’ve built two modest buildings in Kaohsiung and been involved in many competitions — all of which we’ve lost,” Harbour said.
Harbour’s self-deprecating humor corresponds with Rogers’ approach to architecture, which is both playful and human-centered. Underlying the levity, however, is a concern “with the processes of construction and the way that people relate to the buildings around them.” It is an ethos that they’ve applied to this show.
Each of the nine thematic areas — Early Work, Transparent, Lightweight, Legible, Green, Public, Systems, Urban and Work in Progress — offer visitors a grounding in the ideas that inform Rogers’ approach to architecture. Together they include 78 new and archive models, 80 drawings, 160 photographs, 22 videos and a timeline illustrating the development of Rogers’ architectural practice. Arranged in easily digestible color-coded blocks, there are designs of airports, galleries, courts and government buildings, as well as housing projects, each accompanied with explanations of materials used and purpose of construction.
The two Kaohsiung-based buildings Harbour alluded to illustrate Rogers’ ideas of space and how buildings should suit the environment within which they are erected.
The Ching Fu Group Headquarters (慶富船運大樓) with its exposed columns and primary color finishings recalls the Pompidou Center, but here with the addition of external glass boxes that serve as meeting rooms and offer views of the harbor. Built between 2005 and 2007, the self-cooling structure is an example of the kind of energy-saving building ideally suited for Taiwan’s climate.
Whereas the Ching Fu building emphasizes environmental concerns, the R9 Central Park Station (捷運R9中央公園站) on the Kaohsiung MRT’s red line exemplifies Rogers’ belief that a building should fit fluidly within its surroundings.
The design merges the concourse with the surrounding landscape, enabling the station to seamlessly unite with the expansive greenery of the park. A 50m-by-50m aluminum canopy lets natural light in while reflecting the sun’s glare and protecting passengers from the rain.
Remarking candidly at the press conference on Rogers’ comprehensive approach to architecture, Christine Skinner, outgoing director of the British Council, said the Taipei City Government could learn a thing or two from the exhibit.
“There are parts of Taipei that have obviously been developed in a holistic way,” she said referring to Xinyi (信義) and Neihu (內湖) districts.
“But there are other parts of Taipei where that planning is not happening and buildings are conceived one by one ... [Y]ou do get a feeling that not a lot of urban planning has gone on and I think that is something that Taipei in particular needs to put right,” she said.
One of the biggest sore spots in Taiwan’s historical friendship with the US came in 1979 when US president Jimmy Carter broke off formal diplomatic relations with Taiwan’s Republic of China (ROC) government so that the US could establish relations with the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Taiwan’s derecognition came purely at China’s insistence, and the US took the deal. Retired American diplomat John Tkacik, who for almost decade surrounding that schism, from 1974 to 1982, worked in embassies in Taipei and Beijing and at the Taiwan Desk in Washington DC, recently argued in the Taipei Times that “President Carter’s derecognition
This year will go down in the history books. Taiwan faces enormous turmoil and uncertainty in the coming months. Which political parties are in a good position to handle big changes? All of the main parties are beset with challenges. Taking stock, this column examined the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) (“Huang Kuo-chang’s choking the life out of the TPP,” May 28, page 12), the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) (“Challenges amid choppy waters for the DPP,” June 14, page 12) and the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) (“KMT struggles to seize opportunities as ‘interesting times’ loom,” June 20, page 11). Times like these can
June 23 to June 29 After capturing the walled city of Hsinchu on June 22, 1895, the Japanese hoped to quickly push south and seize control of Taiwan’s entire west coast — but their advance was stalled for more than a month. Not only did local Hakka fighters continue to cause them headaches, resistance forces even attempted to retake the city three times. “We had planned to occupy Anping (Tainan) and Takao (Kaohsiung) as soon as possible, but ever since we took Hsinchu, nearby bandits proclaiming to be ‘righteous people’ (義民) have been destroying train tracks and electrical cables, and gathering in villages
Dr. Y. Tony Yang, Associate Dean of Health Policy and Population Science at George Washington University, argued last week in a piece for the Taipei Times about former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) leading a student delegation to the People’s Republic of China (PRC) that, “The real question is not whether Ma’s visit helps or hurts Taiwan — it is why Taiwan lacks a sophisticated, multi-track approach to one of the most complex geopolitical relationships in the world” (“Ma’s Visit, DPP’s Blind Spot,” June 18, page 8). Yang contends that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has a blind spot: “By treating any