Nearly two weeks after US blockbuster Avatar was ordered out of some theaters to make way for homegrown epic Confucius (孔子), the Chinese film is not getting a warm welcome.
The movie about the ancient philosopher’s life starring Chow Yun-fat (周潤發) has been savaged by critics and reports suggest box office sales have been sluggish.
The film is being panned as a wooden and preachy biography that sells out by forcing in battle scenes and even a romantic love interest for the revered thinker.
On the popular movie site Mtime.com, it scored a 3.8 out of 10 in user-submitted reviews, compared to 9.4 for Avatar. The Global Times gave it a 4 out of 10, calling it “thoughtless and mind-numbing.”
Han Han (韓寒), one of China’s most popular writers who is widely viewed as a key voice of the country’s youth generation, gave it a two on his popular blog, calling it an entertainment, educational, and business failure.
“It is a film that could be completely done without,” he wrote.
In its first three weeks in China, Avatar topped US$100 million in revenue to become China’s all-time top-grossing film, or about US$4.7 million a day. Confucius averaged just US$1.8 million a day in its first three days, Xinhua reported. State film agencies refused to provide figures.
The previous box-office champ — the disaster epic 2012 — grossed nearly US$70 million dollars late last year, state media has said.
Reports that the 2D version of Avatar was to be pulled late last month sparked accusations the government wanted it pushed aside for Confucius, whose teachings on harmony and respect for authority enjoy official favor under the ruling Communist Party after decades of being suppressed as “feudal.”
The 3D version of Avatar is expected to continue showing through this month as planned, state press reports have said.
On Wednesday, Confucius’ producer denied that US blockbuster Avatar was ordered out of some theaters to make way for the homegrown film.
John Shum, head of the film company that produced Confucius, denied that Avatar was pulled for his film about social harmony and respect for authority — themes that enjoy official favor in China.
“This is not the fact. We shouldn’t complicate the matter. A movie is a movie and we are simply shooting a touching story about Confucius,” he told reporters in Taipei.
“If China wants to politicize things that’s their business ... It has nothing to do with us,” he said. “But I hope they didn’t do it because it would not help, but hurt Confucius instead.”
Meanwhile, theaters in Beijing and across China continue to show the 2D version of Avatar, according to theaters and movie listing Web sites.
Some Chinese have speculated authorities were nervous about the portrayal in Avatar of a tribe resisting humans chasing them from their land on a far-off planet, saying it too closely evoked a wave of unrest in China linked to land disputes that has made authorities nervous.
China allows only 20 foreign films to be shown in its theaters each year splitting revenue among producers, theaters and local distributors, which the US has criticized as unfairly protecting domestic films.
Part of the problem could be that although it is building theaters rapidly, China still has only a fraction of the number in the US. Moreover, perhaps one-third of its estimated 4,700 cinema screens are too antiquated to show foreign films, according to one industry worker.
Those few foreign films compete with a growing number of domestic films — more than 400 in 2008, including those co-produced with foreign companies. Overall, box-office revenue is soaring.
But China’s main studios are all state-owned and some producers complain that the government cannot decide whether movies should serve as market-driven entertainment or nationalistic propaganda.
Critics say Confucius belongs in the latter category. The movie, produced by Beijing Dadi Century Ltd, focuses on the later life of the philosopher, whose teachings are garnering renewed interest in China. The cast was billed as star-studded. It opened on 2,500 screens in China, a record number.
Chow, who plays Confucius, predicted it would challenge the box-office success of Avatar, produced by 20th Century Fox. But 13,039 Internet users gave Confucius ratings that averaged 4.4 on a scale of 1 to 10 on douban.com, a popular Chinese entertainment Web site. About 95,280 users gave Avatar a rating that averaged 9.1.
The arithmetic is straightforward and uncomfortable. By the end of 2025, Taiwan had committed itself to a 50-30-20 electricity mix — half natural gas, 30 per cent coal, 20 per cent renewables. The Ministry of Economic Affairs’s (MOEA) own monthly energy reports tell a different story. Natural gas reached 47.8 per cent of generation last year. Coal stood at 35.4 per cent, comfortably above its target ceiling. Renewables came in at 13.1 per cent, well short of the 20 per cent Taipei had pledged a decade earlier. Installed renewable capacity reached roughly half of the 12 gigawatts (GW) the government
There are shadowy cabals plotting to sell out Taiwan to be annexed by China, by invasion if necessary. Fortunately, they are buffoons. In 2019, former Bamboo Union gangster and founder of the China Unification Promotion Party (CUPP), Chang An-le (張安樂, colorfully known as “White Wolf”), led a protest at the Legislative Yuan against comments made by then-premier Su Tseng-chang (蘇貞昌) that in the event of an attack by China, he would never surrender, but would protect the nation by fighting to the end, even if he only had a broom. Chang had party members bring a wooden casket that they
Taiwan’s drone exports are taking off, fuelled by the war in Ukraine, as Taiwanese companies seek a stake in the fast-growing global market for unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV). Low-cost drones used for reconnaissance and strikes are in high demand as governments around the world boost defense spending in the face of intensifying conflicts. A relative new player in the increasingly competitive industry, Taiwan’s pitch is to be an “Asian hub” for the production of UAVs and components free of Chinese materials, or “non-red.” That means its UAVs can be up to three times more expensive than their Chinese competitors, like the world’s biggest
It seems every few days one bumps into one of those “real man” comments in which Taiwan is urged to “face reality” or similar, and “make a deal,” with the speaker implying that soon it will be too late. “Deal” advocates always present themselves as having a superior grip on reality, and the manly ability to make the “hard choice.” Their testosterone-laden language often echoes that of Taiwan sellout advocates. Note that such commentary always specifies a process (“make a deal, work with, make progress”), never the end state of what occupation by a violent authoritarian colonialist state will entail. In
RSS