1885 Burger Store was taking a big risk locating its recently opened premises a stone’s throw away from Evans Burger (reviewed here on Feb. 27). Evans packs in the crowds not only because of its prices and snappy service, but also with its relaxing colonial-style space.
Burger Store clearly did its homework before opening. Its interior of soft lighting, brick walls, wood finishes and comfortable booths matches Evans’ laid-back vibe. Also like Evans, this joint offers cola refills for free and there is no service charge. Unlike Evans, Burger Store is mainly interested in one thing: burgers. And when it comes to its daily burger specials (served during the week from 11am to 6pm), Burger Store is good value.
Monday’s offering is the cheddar and Swiss cheese burger (NT$190); Tuesday’s is the cheese and mushroom burger (NT$180); Wednesday’s is a grilled steak burger (NT$220); Thursday’s is the BBQ bacon and cheese burger (NT$220); and the week rounds out with a BBQ pineapple and cheese burger (NT$220). All burger specials are served with French fries and a drink. As it was Tuesday, I went with the cheese and mushroom burger.
Generous slices of fresh mushrooms, lightly fried, rested on a piece of melted processed cheese and thick beef patty on an open bun. The sliced tomatoes, red onions and lettuce along with three slices of pickle come on the side for patrons to add them if they so choose.
To set itself apart from similar restaurants, Burger Store has added some novel flourishes such as substituting plates with wooden cutting boards and placing the fries in cute metal pails.
For the price, it was an impressive display. The fries were crispy while the burger was juicy and tasty.
Less impressive, however, was the grilled steak breakfast (NT$290). It came served with two thin slabs of beef, two eggs (any style), a choice of cheese potatoes or hash browns and salad, juice and bread.
We were surprised to find a whole-wheat hamburger bun accompanied the dish. Is Burger Store too specialized in making burgers to offer sliced bread?
The vegetables in the salad consisted of those that accompanied the burger. Hiding them underneath a mound of canned corn merely added insult to injury. Even the cheese sauce that came with the very oily and flavorless potatoes tasted suspiciously like the same variety used on the burger. All that was missing from this burger-disguised-as-a-breakfast was the pickles and mushrooms.
The dish began to make sense only when my dining companion piled the egg and slightly gristly steak on top of the bun — burger style. Some baked beans here or fried onion there would have done much for this “breakfast.”
Burger Store won’t win accolades for originality or superior taste. But what it does do — whip up a solid burger — it does well.
Oct. 27 to Nov. 2 Over a breakfast of soymilk and fried dough costing less than NT$400, seven officials and engineers agreed on a NT$400 million plan — unaware that it would mark the beginning of Taiwan’s semiconductor empire. It was a cold February morning in 1974. Gathered at the unassuming shop were Economics minister Sun Yun-hsuan (孫運璿), director-general of Transportation and Communications Kao Yu-shu (高玉樹), Industrial Technology Research Institute (ITRI) president Wang Chao-chen (王兆振), Telecommunications Laboratories director Kang Pao-huang (康寶煌), Executive Yuan secretary-general Fei Hua (費驊), director-general of Telecommunications Fang Hsien-chi (方賢齊) and Radio Corporation of America (RCA) Laboratories director Pan
The consensus on the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chair race is that Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) ran a populist, ideological back-to-basics campaign and soundly defeated former Taipei mayor Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌), the candidate backed by the big institutional players. Cheng tapped into a wave of popular enthusiasm within the KMT, while the institutional players’ get-out-the-vote abilities fell flat, suggesting their power has weakened significantly. Yet, a closer look at the race paints a more complicated picture, raising questions about some analysts’ conclusions, including my own. TURNOUT Here is a surprising statistic: Turnout was 130,678, or 39.46 percent of the 331,145 eligible party
The classic warmth of a good old-fashioned izakaya beckons you in, all cozy nooks and dark wood finishes, as tables order a third round and waiters sling tapas-sized bites and assorted — sometimes unidentifiable — skewered meats. But there’s a romantic hush about this Ximending (西門町) hotspot, with cocktails savored, plating elegant and never rushed and daters and diners lit by candlelight and chandelier. Each chair is mismatched and the assorted tables appear to be the fanciest picks from a nearby flea market. A naked sewing mannequin stands in a dimly lit corner, adorned with antique mirrors and draped foliage
President William Lai (賴清德) has championed Taiwan as an “AI Island” — an artificial intelligence (AI) hub powering the global tech economy. But without major shifts in talent, funding and strategic direction, this vision risks becoming a static fortress: indispensable, yet immobile and vulnerable. It’s time to reframe Taiwan’s ambition. Time to move from a resource-rich AI island to an AI Armada. Why change metaphors? Because choosing the right metaphor shapes both understanding and strategy. The “AI Island” frames our national ambition as a static fortress that, while valuable, is still vulnerable and reactive. Shifting our metaphor to an “AI Armada”
RSS