It was an act of ravenous readership that summed up the public’s astonishing appetite on Tuesday for The Lost Symbol, Dan Brown’s long-awaited follow up to his best-selling The Da Vinci Code, which has been launched worldwide.
The world champion speed reader Anne Jones claimed to have devoured the 506-page adventure of “symbologist” Robert Langdon in just 41 minutes and 55 seconds in a feat that raised hopes that Brown, the 45-year old son of a maths professor and a musician from New Hampshire, has produced a book so easy to read that The Lost Symbol will become the best-read adult novel in publishing history.
Yesterday, the UK supermarket giant Tesco was selling 19 copies a minute from displays next to its fruit and vegetables while rival Asda, part of the Wal-Mart group, shifted 18,000 copies by 4pm. Brown’s publisher, Random House, is so convinced of The Lost Symbol’s success it has printed 6.5 million copies, the most in its history.
In a display of “event publishing” usually reserved for the biggest sellers including JK Rowling and Stephanie Meyer, crates of the book were sealed with legal agreements and could not be opened until midnight. Only four people in the country had read a copy before last night. It was all to safeguard a marketing campaign which some believe could come close to achieving sales on a par with Rowling’s last Harry Potter book, which sold 3.5 million copies in its first eight days.
The Lost Symbol charts similar territory to The Da Vinci Code, with the hero decoding puzzles and going on the run from shadowy forces, this time Freemasons. Some reviewers branded The Lost Symbol “moronic, derivative and clunky.”
Others applauded Brown’s ability to give his millions of fans what they want. For the publishing industry, the book’s strengths
and weaknesses were only being measured
in numbers.
Dan Brown has already sold books worth US$104 million in the UK since 2003 and The Da Vinci Code alone sold 5.2 million copies worth US$46 million, including illustrated editions, spin-off fictional journals and box sets.
“This is beyond books,” said Paul Baggaley, publisher at rival firm Picador. “It has become an event which is a phenomenon.”
But booksellers’ enthusiasm for Brown’s ability to draw in readers was tempered yesterday as a price war broke out. Asda and Tesco slashed the price of the US$31 hardcover to just US$8, Waterstones offered it for half price and Borders gave a 30 percent discount.
“It’s always good to see books making the news,” said Tim Godfray, chief executive of the Booksellers Association. “But with every mega-best-selling title comes a huge price war, often with the result that the trade as a whole makes very little money on its most valued assets.”
Baggaley said it remains questionable whether the soaring sales of Dan Brown books will have a beneficial effect for publishers of other books. “In Tesco this morning the book was on display, not in the book section, but as soon as you walked in, so it is not as if you are going to be drawn into buying other books as well,” he said.
Oct. 27 to Nov. 2 Over a breakfast of soymilk and fried dough costing less than NT$400, seven officials and engineers agreed on a NT$400 million plan — unaware that it would mark the beginning of Taiwan’s semiconductor empire. It was a cold February morning in 1974. Gathered at the unassuming shop were Economics minister Sun Yun-hsuan (孫運璿), director-general of Transportation and Communications Kao Yu-shu (高玉樹), Industrial Technology Research Institute (ITRI) president Wang Chao-chen (王兆振), Telecommunications Laboratories director Kang Pao-huang (康寶煌), Executive Yuan secretary-general Fei Hua (費驊), director-general of Telecommunications Fang Hsien-chi (方賢齊) and Radio Corporation of America (RCA) Laboratories director Pan
The consensus on the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chair race is that Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) ran a populist, ideological back-to-basics campaign and soundly defeated former Taipei mayor Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌), the candidate backed by the big institutional players. Cheng tapped into a wave of popular enthusiasm within the KMT, while the institutional players’ get-out-the-vote abilities fell flat, suggesting their power has weakened significantly. Yet, a closer look at the race paints a more complicated picture, raising questions about some analysts’ conclusions, including my own. TURNOUT Here is a surprising statistic: Turnout was 130,678, or 39.46 percent of the 331,145 eligible party
The classic warmth of a good old-fashioned izakaya beckons you in, all cozy nooks and dark wood finishes, as tables order a third round and waiters sling tapas-sized bites and assorted — sometimes unidentifiable — skewered meats. But there’s a romantic hush about this Ximending (西門町) hotspot, with cocktails savored, plating elegant and never rushed and daters and diners lit by candlelight and chandelier. Each chair is mismatched and the assorted tables appear to be the fanciest picks from a nearby flea market. A naked sewing mannequin stands in a dimly lit corner, adorned with antique mirrors and draped foliage
President William Lai (賴清德) has championed Taiwan as an “AI Island” — an artificial intelligence (AI) hub powering the global tech economy. But without major shifts in talent, funding and strategic direction, this vision risks becoming a static fortress: indispensable, yet immobile and vulnerable. It’s time to reframe Taiwan’s ambition. Time to move from a resource-rich AI island to an AI Armada. Why change metaphors? Because choosing the right metaphor shapes both understanding and strategy. The “AI Island” frames our national ambition as a static fortress that, while valuable, is still vulnerable and reactive. Shifting our metaphor to an “AI Armada”