Michael Moore, the most successful documentary filmmaker of all time, is thinking of getting out of the business of making documentaries.
Not right away. He’s got the sure-to-be-controversial Capitalism: A Love Story due in US theaters Oct. 2. But after that?
“While I’ve been making this film I’ve been thinking that maybe this will be my last documentary,” says the Flint native, who filmed and starred in such hits as Sicko, Bowling for Columbine and Fahrenheit 9/11. “Or maybe for a while.”
Those three films make up half of the top six documentaries ever made, according to boxofficemojo.com. Fahrenheit 9/11 is the highest earning documentary ever, with a domestic take of US$119 million.
But now he’s looking to branch out as a director.
“I have been working on two screenplays over the last couple of years,” he says. “One’s a comedy, one’s a mystery, and I really want to do this.”
Moore, 55, is sitting in the driver’s seat of a dark green van, parked behind the Old Opera House here on a Friday afternoon. He’s both frazzled and buzzed.
He’s just come from a public panel discussion with the Michigan Film Office Advisory Council, a cheerleading affair for the Michigan Film Incentives law and for the growth of the local film industry.
The discussion was part of the Traverse City Film Festival, celebrating its fifth year, which Moore created and which seems to grow exponentially each summer.
His wife, Kathy, is on the phone. He has to meet her for lunch and arrange some movie tickets for her folks.
Oh, and he has to deliver his first cut of Capitalism: A Love Story to the studio later that night.
If the movie does turn out to be his last documentary, some fans are sure to be disappointed.
“It would leave us with a big loss if he stopped making documentary films,” says Ruth Daniels, vice president for marketing for Detroit-area Emagine theaters, who remembers showing Moore’s films dating back to 1989’s Roger & Me.
“His documentaries do make quite a bit of money and he’s paved the way for documentary movies to become mainstream,” she says. “It will leave a void.”
For now, though, Moore is caught up in the enthusiasm of the festival, which ends today.
“This has been the best festival yet, certainly the smoothest run, the largest crowds,” Moore says.
At the panel discussion, Moore said the festival had 37 percent more sponsors this year and advance ticket sales were up 25 percent, despite Michigan’s economic woes.
Over the past five years, Moore said, the festival has sold a 250,000 movie tickets, and while he’s happy the crowds keep coming, he’s intent on keeping commercialism to a minimum.
Sponsorships are kept low-key, no commercials run before films, and industry wheeler-dealers — agents, buyers, distributors — don’t make their way to Traverse City, although many of the filmmakers do.
“My goal is to keep it as a festival for movie lovers. The fact that you can park your car and walk to all the venues, it has a real communal feel here,” Moore says. “You don’t want this to be Park City (home to Utah’s far more crowded and industry-oriented Sundance Film Festival).”
Unlike many cultural events, the festival seems to be wholly embraced by the town it’s in. Many of the moviegoers are local and more than 1,000 people volunteer at the festival.
Moore is working full time in northern Michigan now, although his perspective certainly hasn’t mellowed. In Capitalism, the director — who has explored America’s health care system, its propensity for gun violence and its journey to war in Iraq — is taking on nothing less than the American economic system.
“I thought, why don’t I just go for it and go right to the source of the problem — an economic system that is unfair, it’s unjust and it’s not democratic. And now we’ve learned it doesn’t work,” he says.
“This issue informs all my other movies. I started thinking if I can only make one more movie — I started thinking this of course during the Bush years — what would that movie be? And this is the movie.”
From his first film, Roger & Me, in which Moore roasted General Motors, his sense of humor and strong point of view have outraged many critics while drawing in huge audiences.
Moore says “objectivity is a nonsensical concept that’s really been misused” and that his approach to documentaries is to make sure they’re good, informative, entertaining movies first.
“The term documentary got pigeonholed a long time ago, and 20 years ago when I made Roger & Me, I guess my hope was to bust loose through that strict structure and perception of what a documentary should be and allow it to be everything any other work of nonfiction can be,” he says. “A nonfiction book can be a book of both fact and opinion, it can be just fact, it can be just opinion.”
“Humor is OK in a documentary. Before me, I was told it had to be castor oil. No, you’re making a movie; you’re making a piece of entertainment. You’re asking someone to leave the house on a Friday night to go to a movie.”
But time’s a-wasting and Moore has to dash off into his busy day. To pick up his wife. Pick up his in-laws. Grab some lunch. And then go finish what may be the last documentary he ever makes.
May 6 to May 12 Those who follow the Chinese-language news may have noticed the usage of the term zhuge (豬哥, literally ‘pig brother,’ a male pig raised for breeding purposes) in reports concerning the ongoing #Metoo scandal in the entertainment industry. The term’s modern connotations can range from womanizer or lecher to sexual predator, but it once referred to an important rural trade. Until the 1970s, it was a common sight to see a breeder herding a single “zhuge” down a rustic path with a bamboo whip, often traveling large distances over rugged terrain to service local families. Not only
Ahead of incoming president William Lai’s (賴清德) inauguration on May 20 there appear to be signs that he is signaling to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and that the Chinese side is also signaling to the Taiwan side. This raises a lot of questions, including what is the CCP up to, who are they signaling to, what are they signaling, how with the various actors in Taiwan respond and where this could ultimately go. In the last column, published on May 2, we examined the curious case of Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) heavyweight Tseng Wen-tsan (鄭文燦) — currently vice premier
The last time Mrs Hsieh came to Cihu Park in Taoyuan was almost 50 years ago, on a school trip to the grave of Taiwan’s recently deceased dictator. Busloads of children were brought in to pay their respects to Chiang Kai-shek (蔣中正), known as Generalissimo, who had died at 87, after decades ruling Taiwan under brutal martial law. “There were a lot of buses, and there was a long queue,” Hsieh recalled. “It was a school rule. We had to bow, and then we went home.” Chiang’s body is still there, under guard in a mausoleum at the end of a path
Last week the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) released a set of very strange numbers on Taiwan’s wealth distribution. Duly quoted in the Taipei Times, the report said that “The Gini coefficient for Taiwanese households… was 0.606 at the end of 2021, lower than Australia’s 0.611, the UK’s 0.620, Japan’s 0.678, France’s 0.676 and Germany’s 0.727, the agency said in a report.” The Gini coefficient is a measure of relative inequality, usually of wealth or income, though it can be used to evaluate other forms of inequality. However, for most nations it is a number from .25 to .50