Seen from the perspective of a window washer who is one of the main characters in Lost in Beijing (蘋果), the Chinese capital is an endless vista of glassy high-rises. Closer to the ground, in the lyrical documentary montages that frame Li Yu’s (李玉) modern urban melodrama, the city is a hive of human work and pleasure seeking. There are tango clubs and dive bars, car dealerships and open-air markets, nouveau riches in their Mercedes-Benzes and homeless people stretched out on benches.
There are, at last count, something like 17 million stories in this naked city, and Li, who wrote the screenplay for Lost in Beijing with Fang Li (方勵), relates a tale that is at once representative of the social and economic tensions afflicting 21st-century China and ripely, improbably melodramatic. The director and her cast work in a rough, naturalistic style, but the narrative offers both the pleasures and the limitations of old-fashioned class-conscious pulp. In spite of its raw, explicit moments, the film is at heart a sturdy morality tale about innocence and corruption, wealth and want, sex and power.
An-kun (played by Tong Da Wei, 佟大為), the window washer, is married to Ping-guo (Fan Bingbing, 范冰冰), who works at the Gold Basin Massage Palace rubbing the feet of tired businessmen and deflecting their roving hands. Her boss, Mr Lin (Tony Leung Ka Fai, 梁家輝), is a rough character as yet unpolished by money, an unapologetic gambler and womanizer. One afternoon he finds Ping-guo passed out in his office, and his attempt to take advantage of her turns from a clumsy pass into a rape. An-kun, who happens to be washing the window of Mr Lin’s office and witnesses the assault — this is what I mean by improbable — tries first to attack the older, more powerful man and then to blackmail him.
When Ping-guo discovers she’s pregnant, Lost in Beijing begins a curious, not entirely successful transition from melodrama to domestic comedy. Mrs Lin (Elaine Jin, 金燕玲), who is infertile, takes her revenge on her husband by sleeping with An-kun, even as Mr Lin starts to see his own possible paternity as a neat solution for everyone. The baby, he reasons, will save his marriage, and the more than 100,000 yuan he will pay Ping-guo and An-kun for their trouble will assuage his guilt and help the young couple toward a better and more prosperous life.
Though the film’s emotional tone is blurry — toward the end it swerves away from farce and back toward anguish — its social criticism could hardly be more clear. The metropolis it depicts is one in which money is the measure of all value, and in which every human relationship can be reduced to a transaction, a deal. Ping-guo and An-kun, industrious young people from a Northeastern province, are unsurprisingly overwhelmed by this way of life, but so, in their own way, are Mr and Mrs Lin. Jin, one of Taiwan’s finest actresses, and Leung, a durable star of the Hong Kong cinema, rescue their characters from easy caricature.
The other actors are also very good — Fan’s blend of toughness and delicacy places her in a rich tradition of Chinese screen heroines — and, along with the city itself, they help give Lost in Beijing a human complexity that cuts against the schematic artifice of its story.
Behind a car repair business on a nondescript Thai street are the cherished pets of a rising TikTok animal influencer: two lions and a 200-kilogram lion-tiger hybrid called “Big George.” Lion ownership is legal in Thailand, and Tharnuwarht Plengkemratch is an enthusiastic advocate, posting updates on his feline companions to nearly three million followers. “They’re playful and affectionate, just like dogs or cats,” he said from inside their cage complex at his home in the northern city of Chiang Mai. Thailand’s captive lion population has exploded in recent years, with nearly 500 registered in zoos, breeding farms, petting cafes and homes. Experts warn the
The unexpected collapse of the recall campaigns is being viewed through many lenses, most of them skewed and self-absorbed. The international media unsurprisingly focuses on what they perceive as the message that Taiwanese voters were sending in the failure of the mass recall, especially to China, the US and to friendly Western nations. This made some sense prior to early last month. One of the main arguments used by recall campaigners for recalling Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers was that they were too pro-China, and by extension not to be trusted with defending the nation. Also by extension, that argument could be
Aug. 4 to Aug. 10 When Coca-Cola finally pushed its way into Taiwan’s market in 1968, it allegedly vowed to wipe out its major domestic rival Hey Song within five years. But Hey Song, which began as a manual operation in a family cow shed in 1925, had proven its resilience, surviving numerous setbacks — including the loss of autonomy and nearly all its assets due to the Japanese colonial government’s wartime economic policy. By the 1960s, Hey Song had risen to the top of Taiwan’s beverage industry. This success was driven not only by president Chang Wen-chi’s
Last week, on the heels of the recall election that turned out so badly for Taiwan, came the news that US President Donald Trump had blocked the transit of President William Lai (賴清德) through the US on his way to Latin America. A few days later the international media reported that in June a scheduled visit by Minister of National Defense Wellington Koo (顧立雄) for high level meetings was canceled by the US after China’s President Xi Jinping (習近平) asked Trump to curb US engagement with Taiwan during a June phone call. The cancellation of Lai’s transit was a gaudy
RSS