You may begin by picturing a spring day in Berlin, two months after the rise of Adolf Hitler. It is late March 1933, and a man has called upon an art transporter, Gustav Knauer, to hire him for a job.
His name is Paul von Mendelssohn-Bartholdy, a banker and scion of a wealthy Jewish family of philanthropists and financiers and patrons of the arts. At 58, and in failing health, Herr Mendelssohn-Bartholdy is known throughout Berlin - indeed throughout all Europe - for his luminous collection of Impressionist and early Modern paintings that hang at his town house in the Alsenstrasse and at the family villa outside town.
The matter at hand on this day, March 23, concerns five Picassos that Herr Mendelssohn-Bartholdy is sending to Switzerland. Knauer has arranged for them to be received by a Swiss dealer and placed in private storage. There they will remain for an entire year, safely stowed, until the banker in Berlin decides to sell them, a decision that sets in motion a lawsuit on another continent not to be filed for another 74 years.
That lawsuit, filed this month in Federal District Court in Manhattan, New York, now pits an heir of the Mendelssohn-Bartholdy family against the Solomon R. Guggenheim Foundation and the Museum of Modern Art. The heir, Julius Schoeps, a grandson of one of Paul von Mendelssohn-Bartholdy's sisters, has claimed that two of the Picassos - Le Moulin de la Galette, done in 1900, and Boy Leading a Horse, from 1906 - were sold under duress during the Nazi regime, and thus belong to him. The two museums, which have displayed the paintings for more than 40 years, claim they were never part of a forced sale and have asked a court to declare them the rightful owners.
The lawsuit is many things to many people: a footnote to the Picasso story, an historic art-world spat and the latest example of museums joining forces to win legal confirmation that they own disputed works. But because of the vast research performed by the museums to establish the provenance of the paintings, it is also a privileged and ornately detailed glimpse into the lives of an aristocratic Prussian-Jewish family at the moment of its demise.
Unlike much of European Jewry, the Mendelssohn-Bartholdys lived in luxury from as early as 1795 with the founding of Mendelssohn & Company, the family's private bank. There were thinkers and artists in the family - notably the philosopher Moses Mendelssohn and the composer known as Felix Mendelssohn. By the turn of the 20th century, they were better known for finance and philanthropy and for having been elevated to the aristocracy by Kaiser Wilhelm I.
Following tradition, Paul von Mendelssohn-Bartholdy became a co-owner of the bank in 1908 upon his father's death. An early marriage ended in divorce, and in 1927, he remarried - to the aristocratic and extravagantly named Elsa Lucy Emmy Lolo von Lavergue-Peguilhen, later the Countess Kesselstat.
In the way of wealthy men who marry younger second wives, he presented Elsa with a remarkable wedding gift: his art collection. In fact, he left it to her in a reconfigured will, making her master of all property in the marital homes, while providing income for his four sisters, one of them Schoeps' grandmother.
On May 10, 1935, Paul von Mendelssohn-Bartholdy died of a weak heart in a Berlin sanitarium. After the funeral, his widow and his sisters gathered in the country, with the family lawyer, whereupon the will was read and it was determined, to nobody's surprise, that the deceased had been a very wealthy man.
Beyond personal assets of US$684,000 today, there was the villa, Schloss Bornicke; the town house in Berlin; property on the grounds of a royal palace; and holdings in the Netherlands, Belgium and England. There was also the art, minus those Picassos, which at some point that year - no one knows precisely when - had been sold to a gallery in Munich. The gallery owner, Justin Thannhauser, displayed them briefly at a show in Buenos Aires, Argentina, then kept Le Moulin de la Galette for himself while selling Boy Leading a Horse to an American, William Paley, the founder of CBS.
The lawsuit does not say what either man paid for the paintings, though today it is likely that each would sell for millions of US dollars. A lawyer for Schoeps, who has laid claim to both, did not return a telephone call seeking comment.
By 1945, Thannhauser had fled Germany, taking Le Moulin de la Galette on an exile's tour. He went to Paris first, then Switzerland, then finally New York, where in 1963, he gave the painting to the Guggenheim. The very next year, Paley gave Boy Leading a Horse to the Museum of Modern Art.
According to the lawsuit, the family received nothing for the properties the Nazis stole, including Schloss Bornicke, which stands today in the countryside beyond Berlin, a concert hall and tourist site.
With around 10,000 descendants packing the ancestral shrine every Tomb Sweeping Day, the Yeh family’s grand affair made a bid for the Guiness Book of World Records in 2016. They won’t be coming even close on Saturday. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, less than 30 people will be attending and conducting the rituals. “We hope that our ancestors don’t take offense,” branch association head Yeh Lun-tsai (葉倫在) tells the Liberty Times (sister paper of the Taipei Times). Tomb Sweeping Day activities can potentially aggravate the spread of the virus as large groups congregate in cemeteries and columbariums at the same
In terms of life expectancy for its citizens, in recent decades Taiwan has caught up with and overtaken a number of Western countries. According to the most recent edition of the CIA’s World Factbook, Taiwanese now live longer than Americans, Czechs and Poles. Of course, the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic may shake up the rankings. Taiwan’s single-payer healthcare system, set up in 1995, is one reason why people here can stay healthy for a long time. Before the postwar Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) regime introduced the piecemeal health-insurance schemes (covering government employees, farmers, and others) that preceded the universal system, sick people
Nowhere are the effects of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) postwar Sinification campaign more visible than in the toponymic revisions that the regime undertook after assuming power. Taipei’s streets were renamed after Chinese cities or quintessentially Chinese values, and with the kind of self-aggrandizing flourish to which the party was partial, the process even referenced itself, Guangfu (光復) — which translates as “retrocession” — becoming a mainstay of urban nomenclature. Above all, the KMT’s top brass was memorialized: the given names of Sun Yat-sen (孫中山) and Chiang Kai-shek (蔣中正) — Zhongshan (中山) and Zhongzheng (中正) — were conferred on locations
April 6 to April 12 Han Chinese settlers from Zhangzhou and Quanzhou were such fierce rivals that simple activities such as buying supplies for festivals would often result in armed violence. It’s said that this was especially severe just before Tomb Sweeping Festival, and to prevent bloodshed Qing Dynasty officials ordered them to conduct their rituals on different days. This is not unlike the government urging people to visit their ancestors’ graves on days other than yesterday’s official Tomb Sweeping Day, also known as the Qingming Festival, to curb the spreading of the COVID-19 pandemic. While the Chinese Nationalist Party