I'm sitting in Paris and some butterflies are fluttering towards me. Loads of them, perfectly clearly. I could allow one to land on my hand, or catch one of the rose petals being blown towards me - except I can't, because they're not real. They're images on a TV in high definition - and in perfect 3D. They look life-sized and real, and I'm not wearing any silly spectacles other than the ones I wear all the time.
People have been working on convincing 3D without the glasses for a long time and the demo is breathtaking. It's on a prototype Philips TV, which won't be available for a while; it would cost US$20,500 at the moment, but that's expected to be vastly lower when it reaches the mass market. Philips isn't the only company investigating the possibilities; Luxembourg-based SeeReal has also made technological developments in the area with its Viewing Window Technology, aiming to reduce the amount of pixels you need before 3D works.
Orange has emerged as an unexpected early player in the market, and I'm watching the demo in its offices. It believes 3D TV will be key to the services it will be able to deliver to people's homes once its 100Mbps fiber-optic Internet service on trial in Paris takes off; hence its interest. The display moves to a beer advert that looks as though you could lift it off the screen, and then there's a demo of a computer game in genuine 3D with bullets flying at you. Four professionally cynical journalists are silenced for once. Later Orange takes a 3D photo of us and shows it to us on a handheld camera, with the hint that phones will do this, one day.
The technology works by throwing a different image to each eye and angling them so that one eye picks up one and the other picks up the other. There are in fact eight separate images, the technologists having added more after early users reported feelings of nausea and dizziness. "All of us have heard of 3D for games, for example, but it's not really 3D," says Philippe Delbary, head of 3D services for Orange. "It's just an attempt to represent depth."
The new technology shows actual 3D and it's impressive. It's not totally natural; if the camera has focused on the foreground, it's not possible to focus on the background as there is no clear image there for your eye to pick up. Once you're used to that it looks perfect. But how quickly will the market embrace it?
One key inhibitor Orange acknowledges is the availability of 3D material. Just two 3D-only films are in production - one by James Cameron and the other by Steven Spielberg - for release in 2009. And two movies, no matter how big, don't amount to a hill of beans when you're trying to establish a new standard.
Laurence Meyer, European Digital Home Analyst for Jupiter Research, regards this as a major drawback. "It will be a long process to have enough content," she says. Orange maintains that within 10 years we will all be watching 3D and demanding existing shows and films be upgraded to look the same. "When people have discovered 3D, they will no longer watch 2D," Delbary says.
But historically, things haven't moved so quickly. Jupiter's Meyer points out that high-definition TV is taking off at the moment, although sluggishly, and there is confusion in the market as to what sort of TV you need to buy: "HD was first demonstrated almost 20 years ago; that's how long it takes," she says. There is a lot for customers to understand about television at the moment, what with high definition, digital switchover and IP (Internet) TV all jostling for our attention. "Digital TV is more transparent to the viewer," she says. "They tend to buy a package rather than a technology. But [the example of] HD suggests take-up [of 3D] will be slower than 10 years."
Another precedent is the move a couple of decades ago to "colorize" everything. The vested interests in the late 1980s insisted that audiences would demand colored versions of old black and white films and wouldn't watch monochrome any more. This turned out to be wrong and it would be foolish not to acknowledge the possibility that the same will be true of 3D as applied to existing movies. (After all, 3D cinema has been tried more than once before, and is a long way from dominating the multiplexes.) Steve Knibbs, chief executive of Vue cinemas, says the declaration of the death of 2D is more than slightly premature. "Great films will continue to be made and enjoyed by millions of moviegoers in 2D," he says. "There is no evidence to suggest otherwise."
PHOTOS: NY TIMES NEWS SERVICE
Vue has, however, shown a number of films converted to 3D and enjoyed positive feedback. The company will let market forces decide how many more cinemas to equip. "I can't say how many we will have by the end of the decade, but if the films get produced in 3D then it will run into the hundreds most likely," says Knibbs. "The audiences we have had for Chicken Little, Monster House, Nightmare Before Christmas and Meet the Robinsons [all in 3D] have all been positive. People have really enjoyed something different."
Movie and video directors with existing work are understandably cautious. Oscar Wright has directed primarily pop videos, including Charlotte Hatherley's Believe and Cold Cut's ETUC. If he were to direct a short film or something else that would get more of a name check than a pop video he'd expect to be consulted before anyone did anything radical to it. "I haven't seen [3D TV] but I'm quite intrigued by it," he says. "As long as the old version is still available it's fine. George Lucas revamped his original Star Wars films and deleted the originals from the public domain; once people were over the 'wow' factor they wanted the originals back, so he was browbeaten into releasing them again. That's a perfect illustration of how this could go."
Orange's claim that 3D TV will take over in a decade is ambitious and, in advance of mass availability of receiving equipment or content, it's difficult to predict its accuracy. The quality is excellent and the TVs will cost only around 20 percent more than a high-def TV. The idea that everything's going to be replaced by 3D, however, flies in the face of history: radio didn't wipe out theater, television didn't wipe out radio and cinema and color didn't preclude watching old black and white movies. The 3D demos in Paris looked excellent; once the rest of the pieces are in place it will undoubtedly find its niche.
In late October of 1873 the government of Japan decided against sending a military expedition to Korea to force that nation to open trade relations. Across the government supporters of the expedition resigned immediately. The spectacle of revolt by disaffected samurai began to loom over Japanese politics. In January of 1874 disaffected samurai attacked a senior minister in Tokyo. A month later, a group of pro-Korea expedition and anti-foreign elements from Saga prefecture in Kyushu revolted, driven in part by high food prices stemming from poor harvests. Their leader, according to Edward Drea’s classic Japan’s Imperial Army, was a samurai
The following three paragraphs are just some of what the local Chinese-language press is reporting on breathlessly and following every twist and turn with the eagerness of a soap opera fan. For many English-language readers, it probably comes across as incomprehensibly opaque, so bear with me briefly dear reader: To the surprise of many, former pop singer and Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) ex-lawmaker Yu Tien (余天) of the Taiwan Normal Country Promotion Association (TNCPA) at the last minute dropped out of the running for committee chair of the DPP’s New Taipei City chapter, paving the way for DPP legislator Su
It’s hard to know where to begin with Mark Tovell’s Taiwan: Roads Above the Clouds. Having published a travelogue myself, as well as having contributed to several guidebooks, at first glance Tovell’s book appears to inhabit a middle ground — the kind of hard-to-sell nowheresville publishers detest. Leaf through the pages and you’ll find them suffuse with the purple prose best associated with travel literature: “When the sun is low on a warm, clear morning, and with the heat already rising, we stand at the riverside bike path leading south from Sanxia’s old cobble streets.” Hardly the stuff of your
Located down a sideroad in old Wanhua District (萬華區), Waley Art (水谷藝術) has an established reputation for curating some of the more provocative indie art exhibitions in Taipei. And this month is no exception. Beyond the innocuous facade of a shophouse, the full three stories of the gallery space (including the basement) have been taken over by photographs, installation videos and abstract images courtesy of two creatives who hail from the opposite ends of the earth, Taiwan’s Hsu Yi-ting (許懿婷) and Germany’s Benjamin Janzen. “In 2019, I had an art residency in Europe,” Hsu says. “I met Benjamin in the lobby