Fri, Jul 06, 2007 - Page 16 News List

Harry Potter's magic turns dark

Inquisition, punishment, abuse of power and the lack of political will to recognize an enemy are all contemporary issues that find an echo in the latest Harry Potter film

By Ian Bartholomew  /  STAFF REPORTER

Harry Potter's growing pains begin to show in the latest installment of the hugely successful franchise.


The big question about the new Harry Potter movie, that gained only marginally less attention than the subject of Harry's first on-screen kiss, was: Who is David Yates? Apart from being the director of Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix, he had managed to remain so low profile as to be almost invisible. The choice of the English television director turns out to be inspired, retrieving the Harry Potter franchise from the abysmal depths, in quality, if not actually in box office takings, into which it seemed to have been heading.

Ever since Alfonso Cuaron took over from Chris Columbus in the third installment, Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban (2004), there has been a good deal of talk about the treatment of the Harry Potter novels becoming darker and deeper. This tended to manifest itself as increasing narrative incoherence, with the moral issues that are supposed to make this fantasy so compelling generally lost in a superabundance of dark CGI gimmickry. A low point was reached with the Tri-Wizard Tournament that ended Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire (2005), directed by Mike Newell, who found himself swamped and thrashing amid the rich pickings of big-budget movie-making. And Newell had at least made movies that people had heard of and had experience of working with Hollywood stars: Four Weddings and a Funeral (1994), Donnie Brasco (1997) and Pushing Tin (1999) were all respectable works in their respective genres, but the Harry Potter industry had become a merchandizing juggernaut out of control, and Newell seemed unable or unwilling to steer his own course in its insistent demand for on-screen splendor.

The few people who took the trouble to watch Yates' 2004 mini-series Sex Traffic (2004) are unlikely to be big fans of the boy wizard, and Yates himself said in an interview with The Guardian newspaper (published in Taipei Times yesterday), that he had thought long and hard before giving in to the huge temptations that the project offered.


Directed By: David Yates

Starring: Daniel Radcliffe (Harry Potter), Emma Watson (Hermione Granger), Rupert Grint (Ron Weasley), Ralph Fiennes (Lord Voldemort), Gary Oldman (Sirius Black), Maggie Smith (Minerva Mcgonagall), Jason Isaacs (Lucius Malfoy), Michael Gambon (Albus Dumbledore), Imelda Staunton (Dolores Umbridge), Katie Leung (Cho Chang)

Running Time: 138 Minutes

Taiwan Release: Wednesday

Yates proved himself a masterful handler of his actors in Sex Traffic, eliciting a soul-shattering performance from novice actors Amamaria Marinca and Maria Popistasu. Marinca, for whom this was the first time in front of the camera, has since gone on to star in 4 Months, 3 Weeks and 2 Days (2007), a drama by Cristian Mungiu about getting an abortion in Communist Romania, which won the Golden Palm and FIPRESCI Prize this year at Cannes. But his resume is relentlessly independent and small time, with no suggestion of any ambition to tackle such a megabuck extravaganza.

Yates' focus on human drama is instantly recognizable from the first couple of scenes of the new Potter movie, the grittiness of his vision seen in the washed out colors and hard edges of his composition, as Harry faces off with his chavish cousin Dudley Dursley in a deserted playground. The cartoonish qualities of Little Whingeing, the home of Harry's uncle Vernon Dursley, have been bleached, leaving the grimy desolation of suburban England with its deserted, dilapidated playgrounds, its concrete underpasses with flickering lights and slimy walls, and the isolation created by thick drawing room windows and firmly closed front doors. There is an infinity of mundane horror behind this ordinary dilapidation against which the "big issue" of the return of Voldemort is thrown into high relief, a device which emphasizes the allegory of contemporary political and moral issues that Order of the Phoenix seeks to establish. The magic is in the feather-light touch.

This story has been viewed 5880 times.

Comments will be moderated. Remarks containing abusive and obscene language, personal attacks of any kind or promotion will be removed and the user banned.

TOP top