Sun, Apr 08, 2007 News Editorials 525266764 visits
 Photo News
 More Features
 More IELTS
 Johnny Neihu
 
 Community Compass
 
  • Back Issue

  •   << >>   Full List

  • TaipeiTimes
  •   Subscribe
  •   Advertise
  •   Employment
  •   FAQ
  •   About Us
  •   Contact Us
  •   Copyright
  • Search Most Read Story Most Viewed Photo
     Print
     Mail
     wiki links

    Big brother gets a new voice

    Britain leads the world in CCTV surveillance. Now, cameras will be fitted with loudspeakers enabling controllers to castigate misbehaving citizens

    By Anna Tomforde
    DPA, LONDON
    Sunday, Apr 08, 2007, Page 19

    A police CCTV camera observes people walking in the Embankment area of central London.
    PHOTO: AFP
    When it comes to Big Brother surveillance, Britain is the champion of the world with the average citizen risking to be caught on CCTV cameras up to 300 times a day.

    Britain, where 4.2 million of the cameras have been installed, relies on the monitoring gadgets far more than any other country in the world.

    Despite accounting for just one percent of the global population, Britain operates 20 percent of all such technology used across the world.

    But despite warnings from experts of a rapid slide into a Big Brother society ¡X the term coming from the novel 1984 by George Orwell about totalitarianism, and not the current reality TV series ¡X the Labour government has embarked on an extension of the program.

    It is introducing so-called talking cameras that tell people off for dropping litter or committing anti-social behavior.

    Under a new pilot scheme, talking CCTV cameras are to be installed in 20 areas across England.

    They have already been used in the town of Middlesbrough, a crime hotspot in the north-east of the country, where anyone seen misbehaving can be told off via a loudspeaker.

    Home Secretary John Reid has earmarked nearly £500,000 to fund the expansion.

    Defending his scheme against critics, Reid said the cameras were aimed at "the small minority" who "litter our streets, vandalize our communities and damage our properties."

    He also announced that competitions would be held at schools in many of the areas for children to become the voice of the cameras.

    "By funding and supporting these local schemes, the government is encouraging children to send this clear message to grown ups ¡X act anti-socially and you will face the shame of being publicly embarrassed," Reid said.

    The talking cameras were "hugely popular" in Middlesbrough and the vast majority of the people there were backing the scheme, he insisted.

    "It helps counter things like litter through drunk or disorderly behavior, gangs congregating. They are the sorts of things that make people's lives a misery. Anything that tackles that is better."

    The fight against so-called anti-social behavior has been a main plank of Blair's law-and-order program, but statistics have shown that the measures taken by the government have failed to have the desired effect.

    The new talking cameras will be installed in 20 towns and cities all over the country, including three districts in London.

    In Middlesbrough, staff in a control center monitor pictures from 12 talking cameras and can communicate directly with people on the street.

    Local councilor Barry Coppinger says the scheme has prevented fights and criminal damage and cut litter levels.

    "Generally, I think it has raised awareness that the town center is a safe place to visit and also that we are keeping an eye open to make sure it is safe," he said.

    But opponent and campaigner Steve Hills said: "Apart from being absurd, I think it's rather sad that we should have faceless cameras barking at us on orders from who?"

    A recent study by the government's privacy watchdog, the Information Commissioner, warned that Britain was becoming a "surveillance society."

    Commissioner Richard Thomas said excessive use of CCTV and other information gathering was creating a climate of suspicion.

    Shami Chakrabati, director of human rights group Liberty, said the report was a clear warning to private and public sectors to curb their appetite for gathering personal information.

    "The desire for a little bit of privacy is part of being human and the nation's dignity should not be for sale," she said.
    This story has been viewed 1319 times.

  • Advertising